food 101 keras
1.0.0
from IPython . display import HTML , Image
url = 'http://stratospark.com/demos/food-101/'
el = '<' + 'iframe src="{}"' . format ( url ) + ' width="100%" height=600></iframe>' # prevent notebook render bug
HTML ( el )Si está leyendo esto en GitHub, la demostración se ve así. Siga el enlace a continuación para ver la demostración en vivo en mi blog.
Image ( 'demo.jpg' )
Demostración disponible @ http://blog.stratospark.com/deep-letarning-applied-food-classification-deep-letarning-kinas.html
Código disponible en https://github.com/stratospark/food-101-kinas
Actualizaciones
Las redes neuronales convolucionales (CNN), una técnica dentro del campo de aprendizaje profundo más amplio, han sido una fuerza revolucionaria en aplicaciones de visión por computadora, especialmente en la última media década más o menos. Un caso de uso principal es el de la clasificación de imágenes, por ejemplo, determinar si una imagen es la de un perro o gato.
No tienes que limitarte a un clasificador binario, por supuesto; Los CNN pueden escalar fácilmente a miles de clases diferentes, como se ve en el conocido conjunto de datos ImageNet de 1000 clases, utilizados para comparar el rendimiento del algoritmo de visión por computadora.
En los últimos años, estas técnicas de vanguardia han comenzado a estar disponibles para la comunidad de desarrollo de software más amplia. Los paquetes de resistencia industrial, como TensorFlow, nos han dado los mismos bloques de construcción que Google usa para escribir aplicaciones de aprendizaje profundo para dispositivos integrados/móviles a grupos escalables en la nube, sin tener que codificar las operaciones de la matriz de GPU, gradientes de derivación parcial y optimizadores estocásticos que hacen posibles aplicaciones eficientes.
Además de todo esto, se encuentran las API fáciles de usar, como Keras, que resumen algunos de los detalles de nivel inferior y nos permiten centrarnos en la creación de prototipos rápidamente de un gráfico de cálculo de aprendizaje profundo. Al igual que mezclaríamos y combinaríamos con Legos para obtener el resultado deseado.
Como proyecto introductorio para mí, elegí usar un clasificador de imagen previamente capacitado que viene con Keras y vuelva a entrenarlo en un conjunto de datos que me parece interesante. Me gustan mucho la buena comida y la cocina casera, por lo que algo así fue apetitoso.
En el documento, Food-101-Componentes discriminativos mineros con bosques aleatorios, introducen el conjunto de datos Food-101. Hay 101 clases diferentes de alimentos, con 1000 imágenes etiquetadas por clase disponibles para capacitación supervisada.
Me inspiré en esta publicación de blog de Keras: construyendo potentes modelos de clasificación de imágenes con muy pocos datos y un script relacionado que encontré en GitHub: Keras-Finetuning.
Recientemente construí un sistema con el fin de experimentar con el aprendizaje profundo. Los componentes clave son un Nvidia Titan X Pascal con 12 GB de memoria, 96 GB de RAM del sistema, así como un Intel Core i7 de 12 núcleos. Está ejecutando Ubuntu 16.04 de 64 bits y usando la distribución de Anaconda Python. Desafortunadamente, no podrá seguir este cuaderno en su propio sistema a menos que tenga suficiente RAM. En el futuro, me gustaría aprender cómo manejar los conjuntos de datos más grandes que RAM de manera performadora. ¡Póngase en contacto si tiene alguna idea!
He pasado aproximadamente 1 mes construyendo este proyecto, tratando de capacitar a docenas de modelos y explorando diversas áreas, como el multiprocesamiento para un aumento de imagen más rápido. Esta es una versión limpia del cuaderno que contiene mi modelo de mejor rendimiento a partir del 22 de enero de 2017.
Después de ajustar un modelo de Google InceptionV3 previamente capacitado, pude lograr aproximadamente 82.03% de precisión Top-1 en el conjunto de pruebas utilizando un solo cultivo por elemento. Usando 10 cultivos por ejemplo y tomando las clases predichas más frecuentes, pude lograr un 86.97% de precisión top-1 y 97.42% de precisión de los 5 mejores
Otros han podido lograr resultados más precisos:
¡Implementado! Echa un vistazo: http://blog.stratospark.com/creating-a-deep-letarning-ios-app-with-kinas-and-tensorflow.html
Importemos todos los paquetes necesarios para el resto del cuaderno:
import matplotlib . pyplot as plt
import matplotlib . image as img
import numpy as np
from scipy . misc import imresize
% matplotlib inline
import os
from os import listdir
from os . path import isfile , join
import shutil
import stat
import collections
from collections import defaultdict
from ipywidgets import interact , interactive , fixed
import ipywidgets as widgets
import h5py
from sklearn . model_selection import train_test_split
from keras . utils . np_utils import to_categorical
from keras . applications . inception_v3 import preprocess_input
from keras . models import load_model Using TensorFlow backend.
Descargue el conjunto de datos y extraiga en la carpeta del cuaderno. Puede ser más fácil hacer esto en una ventana terminal separada.
# !wget http://data.vision.ee.ethz.ch/cvl/food-101.tar.gz # !tar xzvf food-101.tar.gzVeamos qué tipo de alimentos están representados aquí:
!l s food - 101 / images apple_pie eggs_benedict onion_rings
baby_back_ribs escargots oysters
baklava falafel pad_thai
beef_carpaccio filet_mignon paella
beef_tartare fish_and_chips pancakes
beet_salad foie_gras panna_cotta
beignets french_fries peking_duck
bibimbap french_onion_soup pho
bread_pudding french_toast pizza
breakfast_burrito fried_calamari pork_chop
bruschetta fried_rice poutine
caesar_salad frozen_yogurt prime_rib
cannoli garlic_bread pulled_pork_sandwich
caprese_salad gnocchi ramen
carrot_cake greek_salad ravioli
ceviche grilled_cheese_sandwich red_velvet_cake
cheesecake grilled_salmon risotto
cheese_plate guacamole samosa
chicken_curry gyoza sashimi
chicken_quesadilla hamburger scallops
chicken_wings hot_and_sour_soup seaweed_salad
chocolate_cake hot_dog shrimp_and_grits
chocolate_mousse huevos_rancheros spaghetti_bolognese
churros hummus spaghetti_carbonara
clam_chowder ice_cream spring_rolls
club_sandwich lasagna steak
crab_cakes lobster_bisque strawberry_shortcake
creme_brulee lobster_roll_sandwich sushi
croque_madame macaroni_and_cheese tacos
cup_cakes macarons takoyaki
deviled_eggs miso_soup tiramisu
donuts mussels tuna_tartare
dumplings nachos waffles
edamame omelette
!l s food - 101 / images / apple_pie / | head - 10 1005649.jpg
1011328.jpg
101251.jpg
1014775.jpg
1026328.jpg
1028787.jpg
1034399.jpg
103801.jpg
1038694.jpg
1043283.jpg
ls: write error: Broken pipe
Veamos algunas imágenes aleatorias de cada clase de comida. Puede hacer clic derecho y abrir la imagen en una nueva ventana o guardarla para verla a una resolución más alta.
root_dir = 'food-101/images/'
rows = 17
cols = 6
fig , ax = plt . subplots ( rows , cols , frameon = False , figsize = ( 15 , 25 ))
fig . suptitle ( 'Random Image from Each Food Class' , fontsize = 20 )
sorted_food_dirs = sorted ( os . listdir ( root_dir ))
for i in range ( rows ):
for j in range ( cols ):
try :
food_dir = sorted_food_dirs [ i * cols + j ]
except :
break
all_files = os . listdir ( os . path . join ( root_dir , food_dir ))
rand_img = np . random . choice ( all_files )
img = plt . imread ( os . path . join ( root_dir , food_dir , rand_img ))
ax [ i ][ j ]. imshow ( img )
ec = ( 0 , .6 , .1 )
fc = ( 0 , .7 , .2 )
ax [ i ][ j ]. text ( 0 , - 20 , food_dir , size = 10 , rotation = 0 ,
ha = "left" , va = "top" ,
bbox = dict ( boxstyle = "round" , ec = ec , fc = fc ))
plt . setp ( ax , xticks = [], yticks = [])
plt . tight_layout ( rect = [ 0 , 0.03 , 1 , 0.95 ])
Un multiprocessing.Pool Se utilizará el pool para acelerar el aumento de imágenes durante el entrenamiento.
# Setup multiprocessing pool
# Do this early, as once images are loaded into memory there will be Errno 12
# http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14749897/python-multiprocessing-memory-usage
import multiprocessing as mp
num_processes = 6
pool = mp . Pool ( processes = num_processes )Necesitamos mapas de clase a índice y viceversa, para una codificación de etiqueta adecuada e impresión bonita.
class_to_ix = {}
ix_to_class = {}
with open ( 'food-101/meta/classes.txt' , 'r' ) as txt :
classes = [ l . strip () for l in txt . readlines ()]
class_to_ix = dict ( zip ( classes , range ( len ( classes ))))
ix_to_class = dict ( zip ( range ( len ( classes )), classes ))
class_to_ix = { v : k for k , v in ix_to_class . items ()}
sorted_class_to_ix = collections . OrderedDict ( sorted ( class_to_ix . items ()))El conjunto de datos Food-101 tiene una división de tren/prueba proporcionada. Queremos usar esto para comparar nuestro rendimiento de classifcation con otras implementaciones.
# Only split files if haven't already
if not os . path . isdir ( './food-101/test' ) and not os . path . isdir ( './food-101/train' ):
def copytree ( src , dst , symlinks = False , ignore = None ):
if not os . path . exists ( dst ):
os . makedirs ( dst )
shutil . copystat ( src , dst )
lst = os . listdir ( src )
if ignore :
excl = ignore ( src , lst )
lst = [ x for x in lst if x not in excl ]
for item in lst :
s = os . path . join ( src , item )
d = os . path . join ( dst , item )
if symlinks and os . path . islink ( s ):
if os . path . lexists ( d ):
os . remove ( d )
os . symlink ( os . readlink ( s ), d )
try :
st = os . lstat ( s )
mode = stat . S_IMODE ( st . st_mode )
os . lchmod ( d , mode )
except :
pass # lchmod not available
elif os . path . isdir ( s ):
copytree ( s , d , symlinks , ignore )
else :
shutil . copy2 ( s , d )
def generate_dir_file_map ( path ):
dir_files = defaultdict ( list )
with open ( path , 'r' ) as txt :
files = [ l . strip () for l in txt . readlines ()]
for f in files :
dir_name , id = f . split ( '/' )
dir_files [ dir_name ]. append ( id + '.jpg' )
return dir_files
train_dir_files = generate_dir_file_map ( 'food-101/meta/train.txt' )
test_dir_files = generate_dir_file_map ( 'food-101/meta/test.txt' )
def ignore_train ( d , filenames ):
print ( d )
subdir = d . split ( '/' )[ - 1 ]
to_ignore = train_dir_files [ subdir ]
return to_ignore
def ignore_test ( d , filenames ):
print ( d )
subdir = d . split ( '/' )[ - 1 ]
to_ignore = test_dir_files [ subdir ]
return to_ignore
copytree ( 'food-101/images' , 'food-101/test' , ignore = ignore_train )
copytree ( 'food-101/images' , 'food-101/train' , ignore = ignore_test )
else :
print ( 'Train/Test files already copied into separate folders.' ) Train/Test files already copied into separate folders.
Ahora estamos listos para cargar las imágenes de entrenamiento y probar en la memoria. Después de cargar todo, se asignarán unos 80 GB de memoria.
Cualquier imagen que tenga un ancho o una longitud más pequeño que min_size se redimensionará. Esto es para que podamos tomar cultivos de tamaño adecuado durante el aumento de imágenes.
% % time
# Load dataset images and resize to meet minimum width and height pixel size
def load_images ( root , min_side = 299 ):
all_imgs = []
all_classes = []
resize_count = 0
invalid_count = 0
for i , subdir in enumerate ( listdir ( root )):
imgs = listdir ( join ( root , subdir ))
class_ix = class_to_ix [ subdir ]
print ( i , class_ix , subdir )
for img_name in imgs :
img_arr = img . imread ( join ( root , subdir , img_name ))
img_arr_rs = img_arr
try :
w , h , _ = img_arr . shape
if w < min_side :
wpercent = ( min_side / float ( w ))
hsize = int (( float ( h ) * float ( wpercent )))
#print('new dims:', min_side, hsize)
img_arr_rs = imresize ( img_arr , ( min_side , hsize ))
resize_count += 1
elif h < min_side :
hpercent = ( min_side / float ( h ))
wsize = int (( float ( w ) * float ( hpercent )))
#print('new dims:', wsize, min_side)
img_arr_rs = imresize ( img_arr , ( wsize , min_side ))
resize_count += 1
all_imgs . append ( img_arr_rs )
all_classes . append ( class_ix )
except :
print ( 'Skipping bad image: ' , subdir , img_name )
invalid_count += 1
print ( len ( all_imgs ), 'images loaded' )
print ( resize_count , 'images resized' )
print ( invalid_count , 'images skipped' )
return np . array ( all_imgs ), np . array ( all_classes )
X_test , y_test = load_images ( 'food-101/test' , min_side = 299 ) 0 41 french_onion_soup
1 99 tuna_tartare
2 2 baklava
3 12 cannoli
4 8 bread_pudding
5 58 ice_cream
6 63 macarons
7 38 fish_and_chips
8 3 beef_carpaccio
9 59 lasagna
10 84 risotto
11 53 hamburger
12 7 bibimbap
13 15 ceviche
14 92 spring_rolls
15 78 poutine
16 76 pizza
17 19 chicken_quesadilla
18 71 paella
19 11 caesar_salad
20 30 deviled_eggs
21 40 french_fries
22 25 club_sandwich
23 77 pork_chop
24 31 donuts
25 93 steak
26 43 fried_calamari
27 52 gyoza
28 20 chicken_wings
29 47 gnocchi
30 46 garlic_bread
31 81 ramen
32 86 sashimi
33 100 waffles
34 60 lobster_bisque
35 23 churros
36 1 baby_back_ribs
37 0 apple_pie
38 27 creme_brulee
39 79 prime_rib
40 54 hot_and_sour_soup
41 55 hot_dog
42 82 ravioli
43 66 nachos
44 85 samosa
45 95 sushi
46 70 pad_thai
47 87 scallops
48 42 french_toast
49 13 caprese_salad
50 21 chocolate_cake
51 83 red_velvet_cake
52 88 seaweed_salad
53 96 tacos
54 16 cheesecake
55 90 spaghetti_bolognese
56 94 strawberry_shortcake
57 64 miso_soup
58 98 tiramisu
59 74 peking_duck
60 17 cheese_plate
61 69 oysters
62 14 carrot_cake
63 6 beignets
64 61 lobster_roll_sandwich
65 45 frozen_yogurt
66 24 clam_chowder
67 9 breakfast_burrito
68 72 pancakes
69 32 dumplings
70 57 hummus
71 10 bruschetta
72 44 fried_rice
73 97 takoyaki
74 50 grilled_salmon
75 4 beef_tartare
76 89 shrimp_and_grits
77 28 croque_madame
78 49 grilled_cheese_sandwich
79 80 pulled_pork_sandwich
80 56 huevos_rancheros
81 35 escargots
82 91 spaghetti_carbonara
83 34 eggs_benedict
84 33 edamame
85 22 chocolate_mousse
86 18 chicken_curry
87 65 mussels
88 36 falafel
89 37 filet_mignon
90 26 crab_cakes
91 48 greek_salad
92 5 beet_salad
93 51 guacamole
94 29 cup_cakes
95 68 onion_rings
96 39 foie_gras
97 67 omelette
98 73 panna_cotta
99 75 pho
100 62 macaroni_and_cheese
25250 images loaded
693 images resized
0 images skipped
CPU times: user 1min 18s, sys: 4.82 s, total: 1min 23s
Wall time: 1min 23s
% % time
X_train , y_train = load_images ( 'food-101/train' , min_side = 299 ) 0 41 french_onion_soup
1 99 tuna_tartare
2 2 baklava
3 12 cannoli
4 8 bread_pudding
Skipping bad image: bread_pudding 1375816.jpg
5 58 ice_cream
6 63 macarons
7 38 fish_and_chips
8 3 beef_carpaccio
9 59 lasagna
Skipping bad image: lasagna 3787908.jpg
10 84 risotto
11 53 hamburger
12 7 bibimbap
13 15 ceviche
14 92 spring_rolls
15 78 poutine
16 76 pizza
17 19 chicken_quesadilla
18 71 paella
19 11 caesar_salad
20 30 deviled_eggs
21 40 french_fries
22 25 club_sandwich
23 77 pork_chop
24 31 donuts
25 93 steak
Skipping bad image: steak 1340977.jpg
26 43 fried_calamari
27 52 gyoza
28 20 chicken_wings
29 47 gnocchi
30 46 garlic_bread
31 81 ramen
32 86 sashimi
33 100 waffles
34 60 lobster_bisque
35 23 churros
36 1 baby_back_ribs
37 0 apple_pie
38 27 creme_brulee
39 79 prime_rib
40 54 hot_and_sour_soup
41 55 hot_dog
42 82 ravioli
43 66 nachos
44 85 samosa
45 95 sushi
46 70 pad_thai
47 87 scallops
48 42 french_toast
49 13 caprese_salad
50 21 chocolate_cake
51 83 red_velvet_cake
52 88 seaweed_salad
53 96 tacos
54 16 cheesecake
55 90 spaghetti_bolognese
56 94 strawberry_shortcake
57 64 miso_soup
58 98 tiramisu
59 74 peking_duck
60 17 cheese_plate
61 69 oysters
62 14 carrot_cake
63 6 beignets
64 61 lobster_roll_sandwich
65 45 frozen_yogurt
66 24 clam_chowder
67 9 breakfast_burrito
68 72 pancakes
69 32 dumplings
70 57 hummus
71 10 bruschetta
72 44 fried_rice
73 97 takoyaki
74 50 grilled_salmon
75 4 beef_tartare
76 89 shrimp_and_grits
77 28 croque_madame
78 49 grilled_cheese_sandwich
79 80 pulled_pork_sandwich
80 56 huevos_rancheros
81 35 escargots
82 91 spaghetti_carbonara
83 34 eggs_benedict
84 33 edamame
85 22 chocolate_mousse
86 18 chicken_curry
87 65 mussels
88 36 falafel
89 37 filet_mignon
90 26 crab_cakes
91 48 greek_salad
92 5 beet_salad
93 51 guacamole
94 29 cup_cakes
95 68 onion_rings
96 39 foie_gras
97 67 omelette
98 73 panna_cotta
99 75 pho
100 62 macaroni_and_cheese
75747 images loaded
2091 images resized
3 images skipped
CPU times: user 3min 51s, sys: 13.9 s, total: 4min 5s
Wall time: 4min 5s
print ( 'X_train shape' , X_train . shape )
print ( 'y_train shape' , y_train . shape )
print ( 'X_test shape' , X_test . shape )
print ( 'y_test shape' , y_test . shape ) X_train shape (75747,)
y_train shape (75747,)
X_test shape (25250,)
y_test shape (25250,)
@ interact ( n = ( 0 , len ( X_train )))
def show_pic ( n ):
plt . imshow ( X_train [ n ])
print ( 'class:' , y_train [ n ], ix_to_class [ y_train [ n ]]) class: 21 chocolate_cake
@ interact ( n = ( 0 , len ( X_test )))
def show_pic ( n ):
plt . imshow ( X_test [ n ])
print ( 'class:' , y_test [ n ], ix_to_class [ y_test [ n ]]) class: 21 chocolate_cake
@ interact ( n_class = sorted_class_to_ix )
def show_random_images_of_class ( n_class = 0 ):
print ( n_class )
nrows = 4
ncols = 8
fig , axes = plt . subplots ( nrows = nrows , ncols = ncols )
fig . set_size_inches ( 12 , 8 )
#fig.tight_layout()
imgs = np . random . choice (( y_train == n_class ). nonzero ()[ 0 ], nrows * ncols )
for i , ax in enumerate ( axes . flat ):
im = ax . imshow ( X_train [ imgs [ i ]])
ax . set_axis_off ()
ax . title . set_visible ( False )
ax . xaxis . set_ticks ([])
ax . yaxis . set_ticks ([])
for spine in ax . spines . values ():
spine . set_visible ( False )
plt . subplots_adjust ( left = 0 , wspace = 0 , hspace = 0 )
plt . show () 0
@ interact ( n_class = sorted_class_to_ix )
def show_random_images_of_class ( n_class = 0 ):
print ( n_class )
nrows = 4
ncols = 8
fig , axes = plt . subplots ( nrows = nrows , ncols = ncols )
fig . set_size_inches ( 12 , 8 )
#fig.tight_layout()
imgs = np . random . choice (( y_test == n_class ). nonzero ()[ 0 ], nrows * ncols )
for i , ax in enumerate ( axes . flat ):
im = ax . imshow ( X_test [ imgs [ i ]])
ax . set_axis_off ()
ax . title . set_visible ( False )
ax . xaxis . set_ticks ([])
ax . yaxis . set_ticks ([])
for spine in ax . spines . values ():
spine . set_visible ( False )
plt . subplots_adjust ( left = 0 , wspace = 0 , hspace = 0 )
plt . show () 0
Necesitamos codificar un valor de la etiqueta para crear un vector de características binarias en lugar de una característica que pueda tomar los valores n_classes .
from keras . utils . np_utils import to_categorical
n_classes = 101
y_train_cat = to_categorical ( y_train , nb_classes = n_classes )
y_test_cat = to_categorical ( y_test , nb_classes = n_classes ) from keras . applications . inception_v3 import InceptionV3
from keras . applications . inception_v3 import preprocess_input , decode_predictions
from keras . preprocessing import image
from keras . layers import Input
import tools . image_gen_extended as T
# Useful for checking the output of the generators after code change
#from importlib import reload
#reload(T)Necesitaba tener una tubería de aumento de imagen más potente que la que se envía con Keras. Afortunadamente, pude encontrar esta versión modificada para usar como mi base.
El autor había agregado una tubería extensible, que permitió especificar modificaciones adicionales, como funciones de cultivo personalizadas y poder usar el preprocesador de imágenes de inicio. Poder aplicar el preprocesamiento dinámicamente era necesario, ya que no tenía suficiente memoria para mantener todo el conjunto de entrenamiento como float32s . Pude cargar todo el set de entrenamiento como uint8s .
Además, no estaba utilizando completamente mi GPU ni mi CPU multinúcleo. Por defecto, Python solo puede usar un solo núcleo, lo que limita la cantidad de imágenes procesadas/aumentadas que podría enviar a la GPU para su entrenamiento. Según un monitoreo de rendimiento, solo estaba usando un pequeño porcentaje de la GPU en promedio. Al incorporar un multiprocessing Pool de Python, pude obtener una utilización de CPU de aproximadamente 50% y 90% de utilización de GPU.
¡El resultado final es que cada época de entrenamiento pasó de 45 minutos a 22 minutos! Puede ejecutar los gráficos de GPU mientras entrenan en este cuaderno. La inspiración para tratar de mejorar el aumento de datos y el rendimiento de la GPU provino de Jimmie Goode: Generadores de Python Buffered para el aumento de datos
Por el momento, el código es bastante erróneo y requiere reiniciar el núcleo de Python cada vez que el entrenamiento se interrumpe manualmente. El código está bastante pirateado y ciertas características, como las que implican el ajuste, están deshabilitadas. Espero mejorar este iMagedAtagenerator y liberarlo a la comunidad en el futuro.
display ( Image ( './gpu.png' ))
% % time
# this is the augmentation configuration we will use for training
train_datagen = T . ImageDataGenerator (
featurewise_center = False , # set input mean to 0 over the dataset
samplewise_center = False , # set each sample mean to 0
featurewise_std_normalization = False , # divide inputs by std of the dataset
samplewise_std_normalization = False , # divide each input by its std
zca_whitening = False , # apply ZCA whitening
rotation_range = 0 , # randomly rotate images in the range (degrees, 0 to 180)
width_shift_range = 0.2 , # randomly shift images horizontally (fraction of total width)
height_shift_range = 0.2 , # randomly shift images vertically (fraction of total height)
horizontal_flip = True , # randomly flip images
vertical_flip = False , # randomly flip images
zoom_range = [ .8 , 1 ],
channel_shift_range = 30 ,
fill_mode = 'reflect' )
train_datagen . config [ 'random_crop_size' ] = ( 299 , 299 )
train_datagen . set_pipeline ([ T . random_transform , T . random_crop , T . preprocess_input ])
train_generator = train_datagen . flow ( X_train , y_train_cat , batch_size = 64 , seed = 11 , pool = pool ) test_datagen = T . ImageDataGenerator ()
test_datagen . config [ 'random_crop_size' ] = ( 299 , 299 )
test_datagen . set_pipeline ([ T . random_transform , T . random_crop , T . preprocess_input ])
test_generator = test_datagen . flow ( X_test , y_test_cat , batch_size = 64 , seed = 11 , pool = pool )Podemos ver qué tipo de imágenes están saliendo de estos imagedatageneradores:
def reverse_preprocess_input ( x0 ):
x = x0 / 2.0
x += 0.5
x *= 255.
return x % % time
@ interact ()
def show_images ( unprocess = True ):
for x in test_generator :
fig , axes = plt . subplots ( nrows = 8 , ncols = 4 )
fig . set_size_inches ( 8 , 8 )
page = 0
page_size = 32
start_i = page * page_size
for i , ax in enumerate ( axes . flat ):
img = x [ 0 ][ i + start_i ]
if unprocess :
im = ax . imshow ( reverse_preprocess_input ( img ). astype ( 'uint8' ) )
else :
im = ax . imshow ( img )
ax . set_axis_off ()
ax . title . set_visible ( False )
ax . xaxis . set_ticks ([])
ax . yaxis . set_ticks ([])
for spine in ax . spines . values ():
spine . set_visible ( False )
plt . subplots_adjust ( left = 0 , wspace = 0 , hspace = 0 )
plt . show ()
break 
CPU times: user 1.54 s, sys: 524 ms, total: 2.06 s
Wall time: 2.24 s
% % time
show_images ( unprocess = False )
CPU times: user 1.58 s, sys: 300 ms, total: 1.88 s
Wall time: 2.11 s
Volveremos a capacitar un modelo de Google InceptionV3, antes de ImageNet. La arquitectura de la red neuronal se muestra a continuación.
% % time
from keras . models import Sequential , Model
from keras . layers import Dense , Dropout , Activation , Flatten
from keras . layers import Convolution2D , MaxPooling2D , ZeroPadding2D , GlobalAveragePooling2D , AveragePooling2D
from keras . layers . normalization import BatchNormalization
from keras . preprocessing . image import ImageDataGenerator
from keras . callbacks import ModelCheckpoint , CSVLogger , LearningRateScheduler , ReduceLROnPlateau
from keras . optimizers import SGD
from keras . regularizers import l2
import keras . backend as K
import math
K . clear_session ()
base_model = InceptionV3 ( weights = 'imagenet' , include_top = False , input_tensor = Input ( shape = ( 299 , 299 , 3 )))
x = base_model . output
x = AveragePooling2D ( pool_size = ( 8 , 8 ))( x )
x = Dropout ( .4 )( x )
x = Flatten ()( x )
predictions = Dense ( n_classes , init = 'glorot_uniform' , W_regularizer = l2 ( .0005 ), activation = 'softmax' )( x )
model = Model ( input = base_model . input , output = predictions )
opt = SGD ( lr = .01 , momentum = .9 )
model . compile ( optimizer = opt , loss = 'categorical_crossentropy' , metrics = [ 'accuracy' ])
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint ( filepath = 'model4.{epoch:02d}-{val_loss:.2f}.hdf5' , verbose = 1 , save_best_only = True )
csv_logger = CSVLogger ( 'model4.log' )
def schedule ( epoch ):
if epoch < 15 :
return .01
elif epoch < 28 :
return .002
else :
return .0004
lr_scheduler = LearningRateScheduler ( schedule )
model . fit_generator ( train_generator ,
validation_data = test_generator ,
nb_val_samples = X_test . shape [ 0 ],
samples_per_epoch = X_train . shape [ 0 ],
nb_epoch = 32 ,
verbose = 2 ,
callbacks = [ lr_scheduler , csv_logger , checkpointer ]) Epoch 1/32
Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 3.37355, saving model to model4.00-3.37.hdf5
1342s - loss: 4.2541 - acc: 0.0810 - val_loss: 3.3736 - val_acc: 0.2010
Epoch 2/32
Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 3.37355 to 2.36625, saving model to model4.01-2.37.hdf5
1329s - loss: 2.9745 - acc: 0.3075 - val_loss: 2.3662 - val_acc: 0.4071
Epoch 3/32
Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 2.36625 to 1.79355, saving model to model4.02-1.79.hdf5
1329s - loss: 2.3080 - acc: 0.4539 - val_loss: 1.7935 - val_acc: 0.5338
Epoch 4/32
Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 1.79355 to 1.48898, saving model to model4.03-1.49.hdf5
1356s - loss: 2.0102 - acc: 0.5216 - val_loss: 1.4890 - val_acc: 0.6068
Epoch 5/32
Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 1.48898 to 1.34121, saving model to model4.04-1.34.hdf5
1330s - loss: 1.8436 - acc: 0.5577 - val_loss: 1.3412 - val_acc: 0.6431
Epoch 6/32
Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 1.34121 to 1.22485, saving model to model4.05-1.22.hdf5
1329s - loss: 1.7057 - acc: 0.5909 - val_loss: 1.2248 - val_acc: 0.6740
Epoch 7/32
Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve
1328s - loss: 1.5996 - acc: 0.6126 - val_loss: 1.2310 - val_acc: 0.6716
Epoch 8/32
Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 1.22485 to 1.11248, saving model to model4.07-1.11.hdf5
1331s - loss: 1.5148 - acc: 0.6314 - val_loss: 1.1125 - val_acc: 0.7022
Epoch 9/32
Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 1.11248 to 1.07145, saving model to model4.08-1.07.hdf5
1331s - loss: 1.4395 - acc: 0.6506 - val_loss: 1.0714 - val_acc: 0.7095
Epoch 10/32
Epoch 00009: val_loss improved from 1.07145 to 1.05129, saving model to model4.09-1.05.hdf5
1333s - loss: 1.3900 - acc: 0.6637 - val_loss: 1.0513 - val_acc: 0.7181
Epoch 11/32
Epoch 00010: val_loss improved from 1.05129 to 1.03356, saving model to model4.10-1.03.hdf5
1331s - loss: 1.3316 - acc: 0.6780 - val_loss: 1.0336 - val_acc: 0.7250
Epoch 12/32
Epoch 00011: val_loss improved from 1.03356 to 1.00622, saving model to model4.11-1.01.hdf5
1331s - loss: 1.2850 - acc: 0.6893 - val_loss: 1.0062 - val_acc: 0.7275
Epoch 13/32
Epoch 00012: val_loss improved from 1.00622 to 0.94016, saving model to model4.12-0.94.hdf5
1330s - loss: 1.2325 - acc: 0.7003 - val_loss: 0.9402 - val_acc: 0.7461
Epoch 14/32
Epoch 00013: val_loss did not improve
1330s - loss: 1.1970 - acc: 0.7086 - val_loss: 0.9461 - val_acc: 0.7453
Epoch 15/32
Epoch 00014: val_loss did not improve
1329s - loss: 1.1683 - acc: 0.7154 - val_loss: 0.9691 - val_acc: 0.7396
Epoch 16/32
Epoch 00015: val_loss improved from 0.94016 to 0.71776, saving model to model4.15-0.72.hdf5
1329s - loss: 0.9398 - acc: 0.7724 - val_loss: 0.7178 - val_acc: 0.8055
Epoch 17/32
Epoch 00016: val_loss improved from 0.71776 to 0.70245, saving model to model4.16-0.70.hdf5
1329s - loss: 0.8591 - acc: 0.7916 - val_loss: 0.7025 - val_acc: 0.8069
Epoch 18/32
Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
1327s - loss: 0.8238 - acc: 0.8023 - val_loss: 0.7093 - val_acc: 0.8053
Epoch 19/32
Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
1327s - loss: 0.7947 - acc: 0.8093 - val_loss: 0.7048 - val_acc: 0.8059
Epoch 20/32
Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve
1327s - loss: 0.7713 - acc: 0.8143 - val_loss: 0.7097 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 21/32
Epoch 00020: val_loss improved from 0.70245 to 0.69545, saving model to model4.20-0.70.hdf5
1329s - loss: 0.7458 - acc: 0.8195 - val_loss: 0.6955 - val_acc: 0.8104
Epoch 22/32
Epoch 00021: val_loss did not improve
1328s - loss: 0.7282 - acc: 0.8232 - val_loss: 0.6977 - val_acc: 0.8119
Epoch 23/32
Epoch 00022: val_loss improved from 0.69545 to 0.69190, saving model to model4.22-0.69.hdf5
1328s - loss: 0.7114 - acc: 0.8284 - val_loss: 0.6919 - val_acc: 0.8150
Epoch 24/32
Epoch 00023: val_loss did not improve
1325s - loss: 0.6983 - acc: 0.8311 - val_loss: 0.7002 - val_acc: 0.8116
Epoch 25/32
Epoch 00024: val_loss did not improve
1330s - loss: 0.6719 - acc: 0.8381 - val_loss: 0.7031 - val_acc: 0.8112
Epoch 26/32
Epoch 00025: val_loss did not improve
1382s - loss: 0.6607 - acc: 0.8407 - val_loss: 0.7115 - val_acc: 0.8083
Epoch 27/32
Epoch 00026: val_loss did not improve
1330s - loss: 0.6479 - acc: 0.8439 - val_loss: 0.7037 - val_acc: 0.8126
Epoch 28/32
Epoch 00027: val_loss did not improve
1328s - loss: 0.6292 - acc: 0.8478 - val_loss: 0.7122 - val_acc: 0.8086
Epoch 29/32
Epoch 00028: val_loss improved from 0.69190 to 0.68908, saving model to model4.28-0.69.hdf5
1330s - loss: 0.5983 - acc: 0.8580 - val_loss: 0.6891 - val_acc: 0.8165
Epoch 30/32
Epoch 00029: val_loss improved from 0.68908 to 0.68740, saving model to model4.29-0.69.hdf5
1330s - loss: 0.5817 - acc: 0.8612 - val_loss: 0.6874 - val_acc: 0.8149
Epoch 31/32
Epoch 00030: val_loss did not improve
1328s - loss: 0.5729 - acc: 0.8642 - val_loss: 0.6912 - val_acc: 0.8143
Epoch 32/32
Epoch 00031: val_loss did not improve
1329s - loss: 0.5638 - acc: 0.8663 - val_loss: 0.6895 - val_acc: 0.8159
CPU times: user 8h 49min 20s, sys: 1h 55min 54s, total: 10h 45min 14s
Wall time: 11h 51min 18s
En este punto, estamos viendo hasta 81.65 precisión de un solo costo-1 en el conjunto de pruebas. Podemos continuar entrenando al modelo a una tasa de aprendizaje aún más lenta para ver si mejora más.
Mis experimentos iniciales utilizaron optimizadores más modernos como Adam y Adadelta, junto con tasas de aprendizaje superiores. Estuve atascado durante un tiempo por debajo del 80% de precisión antes de decidirse a seguir la literatura más de cerca y usar descenso de gradiente estocástico (SGD) con un horario de aprendizaje rápidamente disminuyendo. Cuando buscamos a través de la superficie multidimensional, a veces ir más lento es muy útil.
Debido a cierta inestabilidad con mi código de multiprocesamiento, a veces necesito reiniciar el cuaderno, cargar el último modelo y luego continuar entrenando.
% % time
from keras . models import Sequential , Model , load_model
from keras . layers import Dense , Dropout , Activation , Flatten
from keras . layers import Convolution2D , MaxPooling2D , ZeroPadding2D , GlobalAveragePooling2D , AveragePooling2D
from keras . layers . normalization import BatchNormalization
from keras . preprocessing . image import ImageDataGenerator
from keras . callbacks import ModelCheckpoint , CSVLogger , LearningRateScheduler , ReduceLROnPlateau
from keras . optimizers import SGD
from keras . regularizers import l2
import keras . backend as K
import math
model = load_model ( filepath = './model4.29-0.69.hdf5' )
opt = SGD ( lr = .01 , momentum = .9 )
model . compile ( optimizer = opt , loss = 'categorical_crossentropy' , metrics = [ 'accuracy' ])
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint ( filepath = 'model4b.{epoch:02d}-{val_loss:.2f}.hdf5' , verbose = 1 , save_best_only = True )
csv_logger = CSVLogger ( 'model4b.log' )
def schedule ( epoch ):
if epoch < 10 :
return .00008
elif epoch < 20 :
return .000016
else :
return .0000032
lr_scheduler = LearningRateScheduler ( schedule )
model . fit_generator ( train_generator ,
validation_data = test_generator ,
nb_val_samples = X_test . shape [ 0 ],
samples_per_epoch = X_train . shape [ 0 ],
nb_epoch = 32 ,
verbose = 2 ,
callbacks = [ lr_scheduler , csv_logger , checkpointer ]) En este punto, deberíamos tener múltiples modelos capacitados guardados en el disco. Podemos revisarlos y usar la función load_model para cargar el modelo con la pérdida más baja / mayor precisión.
% % time
#model = load_model(filepath='./model4.29-0.69.hdf5') # 86.8039 10-crop Top-1 test accuracy
model = load_model ( filepath = './model4b.10-0.68.hdf5' ) # 86.9703 CPU times: user 36.4 s, sys: 1.11 s, total: 37.5 s
Wall time: 36.5 s
También queremos evaluar el conjunto de pruebas utilizando múltiples cultivos. Esto puede generar un aumento de precisión del 5% en comparación con la evaluación de cultivos únicos. Es común usar los siguientes cultivos: arriba a la izquierda, superior a la derecha, abajo a la izquierda, abajo a la derecha, centro. También tomamos los mismos cultivos en la imagen volteados de izquierda a derecha, creando un total de 10 cultivos.
Además, queremos devolver las predicciones TOP-N para cada cultivo para calcular la precisión de las 5 mejores, por ejemplo.
def center_crop ( x , center_crop_size , ** kwargs ):
centerw , centerh = x . shape [ 0 ] // 2 , x . shape [ 1 ] // 2
halfw , halfh = center_crop_size [ 0 ] // 2 , center_crop_size [ 1 ] // 2
return x [ centerw - halfw : centerw + halfw + 1 , centerh - halfh : centerh + halfh + 1 , :] def predict_10_crop ( img , ix , top_n = 5 , plot = False , preprocess = True , debug = False ):
flipped_X = np . fliplr ( img )
crops = [
img [: 299 ,: 299 , :], # Upper Left
img [: 299 , img . shape [ 1 ] - 299 :, :], # Upper Right
img [ img . shape [ 0 ] - 299 :, : 299 , :], # Lower Left
img [ img . shape [ 0 ] - 299 :, img . shape [ 1 ] - 299 :, :], # Lower Right
center_crop ( img , ( 299 , 299 )),
flipped_X [: 299 ,: 299 , :],
flipped_X [: 299 , flipped_X . shape [ 1 ] - 299 :, :],
flipped_X [ flipped_X . shape [ 0 ] - 299 :, : 299 , :],
flipped_X [ flipped_X . shape [ 0 ] - 299 :, flipped_X . shape [ 1 ] - 299 :, :],
center_crop ( flipped_X , ( 299 , 299 ))
]
if preprocess :
crops = [ preprocess_input ( x . astype ( 'float32' )) for x in crops ]
if plot :
fig , ax = plt . subplots ( 2 , 5 , figsize = ( 10 , 4 ))
ax [ 0 ][ 0 ]. imshow ( crops [ 0 ])
ax [ 0 ][ 1 ]. imshow ( crops [ 1 ])
ax [ 0 ][ 2 ]. imshow ( crops [ 2 ])
ax [ 0 ][ 3 ]. imshow ( crops [ 3 ])
ax [ 0 ][ 4 ]. imshow ( crops [ 4 ])
ax [ 1 ][ 0 ]. imshow ( crops [ 5 ])
ax [ 1 ][ 1 ]. imshow ( crops [ 6 ])
ax [ 1 ][ 2 ]. imshow ( crops [ 7 ])
ax [ 1 ][ 3 ]. imshow ( crops [ 8 ])
ax [ 1 ][ 4 ]. imshow ( crops [ 9 ])
y_pred = model . predict ( np . array ( crops ))
preds = np . argmax ( y_pred , axis = 1 )
top_n_preds = np . argpartition ( y_pred , - top_n )[:, - top_n :]
if debug :
print ( 'Top-1 Predicted:' , preds )
print ( 'Top-5 Predicted:' , top_n_preds )
print ( 'True Label:' , y_test [ ix ])
return preds , top_n_preds
ix = 13001
predict_10_crop ( X_test [ ix ], ix , top_n = 5 , plot = True , preprocess = False , debug = True ) Top-1 Predicted: [74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74]
Top-5 Predicted: [[33 97 37 39 74]
[28 52 37 39 74]
[73 39 52 37 74]
[35 33 37 39 74]
[35 33 37 39 74]
[35 33 37 39 74]
[35 33 37 39 74]
[97 37 73 39 74]
[73 52 37 39 74]
[34 35 33 39 74]]
True Label: 88
(array([74, 74, 74, 74, 74, 74, 74, 74, 74, 74]), array([[33, 97, 37, 39, 74],
[28, 52, 37, 39, 74],
[73, 39, 52, 37, 74],
[35, 33, 37, 39, 74],
[35, 33, 37, 39, 74],
[35, 33, 37, 39, 74],
[35, 33, 37, 39, 74],
[97, 37, 73, 39, 74],
[73, 52, 37, 39, 74],
[34, 35, 33, 39, 74]]))
También necesitamos preprocesar las imágenes para el modelo de inicio:
ix = 13001
predict_10_crop ( X_test [ ix ], ix , top_n = 5 , plot = True , preprocess = True , debug = True ) Top-1 Predicted: [51 51 88 88 88 51 51 88 88 88]
Top-5 Predicted: [[18 79 51 13 48]
[48 79 11 55 51]
[79 93 81 37 88]
[51 86 93 81 88]
[11 79 51 81 88]
[19 79 51 56 13]
[11 88 48 51 13]
[37 93 86 88 81]
[37 79 93 88 81]
[84 81 11 79 88]]
True Label: 88
(array([51, 51, 88, 88, 88, 51, 51, 88, 88, 88]), array([[18, 79, 51, 13, 48],
[48, 79, 11, 55, 51],
[79, 93, 81, 37, 88],
[51, 86, 93, 81, 88],
[11, 79, 51, 81, 88],
[19, 79, 51, 56, 13],
[11, 88, 48, 51, 13],
[37, 93, 86, 88, 81],
[37, 79, 93, 88, 81],
[84, 81, 11, 79, 88]]))
Ahora creamos cultivos para cada elemento en el conjunto de pruebas y obtenemos las predicciones. Este es un proceso lento en este momento, ya que no estoy aprovechando el multiprocesamiento u otros tipos de paralelismo.
% % time
preds_10_crop = {}
for ix in range ( len ( X_test )):
if ix % 1000 == 0 :
print ( ix )
preds_10_crop [ ix ] = predict_10_crop ( X_test [ ix ], ix ) 0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
16000
17000
18000
19000
20000
21000
22000
23000
24000
25000
CPU times: user 50min 3s, sys: 5min 13s, total: 55min 16s
Wall time: 31min 28s
Ahora tenemos un conjunto de 10 predicciones para cada imagen. Usando un histograma, puedo ver cómo se distribuye el # de predicciones únicas para cada imagen.
preds_uniq = { k : np . unique ( v [ 0 ]) for k , v in preds_10_crop . items ()}
preds_hist = np . array ([ len ( x ) for x in preds_uniq . values ()])
plt . hist ( preds_hist , bins = 11 )
plt . title ( 'Number of unique predictions per image' ) <matplotlib.text.Text at 0x7fe30c3daa20>
Creemos un diccionario para mapear el índice de elementos de prueba en sus predicciones Top-1 / Top-5.
preds_top_1 = { k : collections . Counter ( v [ 0 ]). most_common ( 1 ) for k , v in preds_10_crop . items ()}
top_5_per_ix = { k : collections . Counter ( preds_10_crop [ k ][ 1 ]. reshape ( - 1 )). most_common ( 5 )
for k , v in preds_10_crop . items ()}
preds_top_5 = { k : [ y [ 0 ] for y in v ] for k , v in top_5_per_ix . items ()} % % time
right_counter = 0
for i in range ( len ( y_test )):
guess , actual = preds_top_1 [ i ][ 0 ][ 0 ], y_test [ i ]
if guess == actual :
right_counter += 1
print ( 'Top-1 Accuracy, 10-Crop: {0:.2f}%' . format ( right_counter / len ( y_test ) * 100 )) Top-1 Accuracy, 10-Crop: 86.97%
CPU times: user 28 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 28 ms
Wall time: 27.3 ms
% % time
top_5_counter = 0
for i in range ( len ( y_test )):
guesses , actual = preds_top_5 [ i ], y_test [ i ]
if actual in guesses :
top_5_counter += 1
print ( 'Top-5 Accuracy, 10-Crop: {0:.2f}%' . format ( top_5_counter / len ( y_test ) * 100 )) Top-5 Accuracy, 10-Crop: 97.42%
CPU times: user 28 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 28 ms
Wall time: 27 ms
y_pred = [ x [ 0 ][ 0 ] for x in preds_top_1 . values ()] @ interact ( page = [ 0 , int ( len ( X_test ) / 20 )])
def show_images_prediction ( page = 0 ):
page_size = 20
nrows = 4
ncols = 5
fig , axes = plt . subplots ( nrows = nrows , ncols = ncols , figsize = ( 12 , 12 ))
fig . set_size_inches ( 12 , 8 )
#fig.tight_layout()
#imgs = np.random.choice((y_all == n_class).nonzero()[0], nrows * ncols)
start_i = page * page_size
for i , ax in enumerate ( axes . flat ):
im = ax . imshow ( X_test [ i + start_i ])
ax . set_axis_off ()
ax . title . set_visible ( False )
ax . xaxis . set_ticks ([])
ax . yaxis . set_ticks ([])
for spine in ax . spines . values ():
spine . set_visible ( False )
predicted = ix_to_class [ y_pred [ i + start_i ]]
match = predicted == ix_to_class [ y_test [ start_i + i ]]
ec = ( 1 , .5 , .5 )
fc = ( 1 , .8 , .8 )
if match :
ec = ( 0 , .6 , .1 )
fc = ( 0 , .7 , .2 )
# predicted label
ax . text ( 0 , 400 , 'P: ' + predicted , size = 10 , rotation = 0 ,
ha = "left" , va = "top" ,
bbox = dict ( boxstyle = "round" ,
ec = ec ,
fc = fc ,
)
)
if not match :
# true label
ax . text ( 0 , 480 , 'A: ' + ix_to_class [ y_test [ start_i + i ]], size = 10 , rotation = 0 ,
ha = "left" , va = "top" ,
bbox = dict ( boxstyle = "round" ,
ec = ec ,
fc = fc ,
)
)
plt . subplots_adjust ( left = 0 , wspace = 1 , hspace = 0 )
plt . show ()
Una matriz de confusión trazará cada etiqueta de clase y cuántas veces fue etiquetada correctamente frente a las otras veces fue etiquetada incorrectamente como una clase diferente.
% % time
from sklearn . metrics import confusion_matrix
import itertools
def plot_confusion_matrix ( cm , classes ,
normalize = False ,
title = 'Confusion matrix' ,
cmap = plt . cm . Blues ):
"""
This function prints and plots the confusion matrix.
Normalization can be applied by setting `normalize=True`.
"""
plt . imshow ( cm , interpolation = 'nearest' , cmap = cmap )
plt . title ( title )
plt . colorbar ()
tick_marks = np . arange ( len ( classes ))
plt . xticks ( tick_marks , classes , rotation = 90 )
plt . yticks ( tick_marks , classes )
if normalize :
cm = cm . astype ( 'float' ) / cm . sum ( axis = 1 )[:, np . newaxis ]
print ( "Normalized confusion matrix" )
else :
print ( 'Confusion matrix, without normalization' )
print ( cm )
thresh = cm . max () / 2.
for i , j in itertools . product ( range ( cm . shape [ 0 ]), range ( cm . shape [ 1 ])):
plt . text ( j , i , cm [ i , j ],
horizontalalignment = "center" ,
color = "white" if cm [ i , j ] > thresh else "black" )
plt . tight_layout ()
plt . ylabel ( 'True label' )
plt . xlabel ( 'Predicted label' )
# Compute confusion matrix
cnf_matrix = confusion_matrix ( y_test , y_pred )
np . set_printoptions ( precision = 2 )
class_names = [ ix_to_class [ i ] for i in range ( 101 )]
plt . figure ()
fig = plt . gcf ()
fig . set_size_inches ( 32 , 32 )
plot_confusion_matrix ( cnf_matrix , classes = class_names ,
title = 'Confusion matrix, without normalization' ,
cmap = plt . cm . cool )
plt . show () Confusion matrix, without normalization
[[179 0 4 ..., 2 0 5]
[ 0 218 0 ..., 0 0 0]
[ 4 0 228 ..., 1 0 0]
...,
[ 0 0 0 ..., 212 0 1]
[ 0 0 0 ..., 0 208 0]
[ 0 0 0 ..., 0 0 224]]
CPU times: user 16.4 s, sys: 1.22 s, total: 17.6 s
Wall time: 16.4 s
Queremos ver si la precisión era consistente en todas las clases, o si algunas clases eran mucho más fáciles / más difíciles de etiquetar que otras. Según nuestra trama, algunas clases fueron atípicas en términos de ser mucho más difícil de etiquetar correctamente.
corrects = collections . defaultdict ( int )
incorrects = collections . defaultdict ( int )
for ( pred , actual ) in zip ( y_pred , y_test ):
if pred == actual :
corrects [ actual ] += 1
else :
incorrects [ actual ] += 1
class_accuracies = {}
for ix in range ( 101 ):
class_accuracies [ ix ] = corrects [ ix ] / 250
plt . hist ( list ( class_accuracies . values ()), bins = 20 )
plt . title ( 'Accuracy by Class histogram' ) <matplotlib.text.Text at 0x7fe2d5d4f860>
sorted_class_accuracies = sorted ( class_accuracies . items (), key = lambda x : - x [ 1 ])
[( ix_to_class [ c [ 0 ]], c [ 1 ]) for c in sorted_class_accuracies ] [('edamame', 0.996),
('hot_and_sour_soup', 0.964),
('oysters', 0.964),
('seaweed_salad', 0.96),
('macarons', 0.956),
('pad_thai', 0.956),
('spaghetti_bolognese', 0.956),
('french_fries', 0.952),
('frozen_yogurt', 0.952),
('takoyaki', 0.952),
('spaghetti_carbonara', 0.948),
('clam_chowder', 0.944),
('deviled_eggs', 0.944),
('churros', 0.94),
('miso_soup', 0.94),
('creme_brulee', 0.936),
('pho', 0.936),
('cannoli', 0.932),
('guacamole', 0.932),
('mussels', 0.932),
('sashimi', 0.932),
('caesar_salad', 0.928),
('lobster_roll_sandwich', 0.928),
('bibimbap', 0.924),
('cup_cakes', 0.924),
('dumplings', 0.924),
('ramen', 0.924),
('beef_carpaccio', 0.92),
('eggs_benedict', 0.92),
('pancakes', 0.92),
('red_velvet_cake', 0.92),
('beignets', 0.916),
('club_sandwich', 0.916),
('escargots', 0.916),
('french_onion_soup', 0.916),
('onion_rings', 0.916),
('baklava', 0.912),
('croque_madame', 0.912),
('fish_and_chips', 0.908),
('poutine', 0.908),
('cheese_plate', 0.904),
('chicken_wings', 0.904),
('fried_rice', 0.904),
('sushi', 0.904),
('fried_calamari', 0.9),
('pulled_pork_sandwich', 0.896),
('waffles', 0.896),
('crab_cakes', 0.892),
('gyoza', 0.892),
('paella', 0.892),
('caprese_salad', 0.888),
('lobster_bisque', 0.888),
('peking_duck', 0.888),
('pizza', 0.888),
('greek_salad', 0.88),
('hot_dog', 0.88),
('samosa', 0.88),
('donuts', 0.876),
('spring_rolls', 0.876),
('baby_back_ribs', 0.872),
('strawberry_shortcake', 0.872),
('shrimp_and_grits', 0.868),
('tacos', 0.86),
('beef_tartare', 0.856),
('prime_rib', 0.856),
('chicken_quesadilla', 0.852),
('hummus', 0.852),
('grilled_salmon', 0.848),
('tiramisu', 0.848),
('macaroni_and_cheese', 0.844),
('carrot_cake', 0.836),
('nachos', 0.836),
('falafel', 0.832),
('tuna_tartare', 0.832),
('panna_cotta', 0.828),
('bruschetta', 0.824),
('grilled_cheese_sandwich', 0.824),
('risotto', 0.812),
('french_toast', 0.808),
('gnocchi', 0.808),
('garlic_bread', 0.804),
('breakfast_burrito', 0.8),
('beet_salad', 0.796),
('hamburger', 0.796),
('cheesecake', 0.792),
('lasagna', 0.792),
('ceviche', 0.784),
('chicken_curry', 0.784),
('omelette', 0.784),
('scallops', 0.784),
('chocolate_cake', 0.78),
('huevos_rancheros', 0.78),
('ravioli', 0.776),
('ice_cream', 0.764),
('bread_pudding', 0.748),
('foie_gras', 0.72),
('apple_pie', 0.716),
('filet_mignon', 0.716),
('chocolate_mousse', 0.7),
('pork_chop', 0.676),
('steak', 0.576)]
Predicción de un archivo local
pic_path = '/home/stratospark/Downloads/soup.jpg'
pic = img . imread ( pic_path )
preds = predict_10_crop ( np . array ( pic ), 0 )[ 0 ]
best_pred = collections . Counter ( preds ). most_common ( 1 )[ 0 ][ 0 ]
print ( ix_to_class [ best_pred ])
plt . imshow ( pic ) french_onion_soup
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fe2d59eb5c0>
Predecir a partir de una imagen en Internet
import urllib . request
@ interact
def predict_remote_image ( url = 'http://themodelhouse.tv/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/hummus.jpg' ):
with urllib . request . urlopen ( url ) as f :
pic = plt . imread ( f , format = 'jpg' )
preds = predict_10_crop ( np . array ( pic ), 0 )[ 0 ]
best_pred = collections . Counter ( preds ). most_common ( 1 )[ 0 ][ 0 ]
print ( ix_to_class [ best_pred ])
plt . imshow ( pic ) hummus
with open ( 'model.json' , 'w' ) as f :
f . write ( model . to_json ()) import json
json . dumps ( ix_to_class ) '{"0": "apple_pie", "1": "baby_back_ribs", "2": "baklava", "3": "beef_carpaccio", "4": "beef_tartare", "5": "beet_salad", "6": "beignets", "7": "bibimbap", "8": "bread_pudding", "9": "breakfast_burrito", "10": "bruschetta", "11": "caesar_salad", "12": "cannoli", "13": "caprese_salad", "14": "carrot_cake", "15": "ceviche", "16": "cheesecake", "17": "cheese_plate", "18": "chicken_curry", "19": "chicken_quesadilla", "20": "chicken_wings", "21": "chocolate_cake", "22": "chocolate_mousse", "23": "churros", "24": "clam_chowder", "25": "club_sandwich", "26": "crab_cakes", "27": "creme_brulee", "28": "croque_madame", "29": "cup_cakes", "30": "deviled_eggs", "31": "donuts", "32": "dumplings", "33": "edamame", "34": "eggs_benedict", "35": "escargots", "36": "falafel", "37": "filet_mignon", "38": "fish_and_chips", "39": "foie_gras", "40": "french_fries", "41": "french_onion_soup", "42": "french_toast", "43": "fried_calamari", "44": "fried_rice", "45": "frozen_yogurt", "46": "garlic_bread", "47": "gnocchi", "48": "greek_salad", "49": "grilled_cheese_sandwich", "50": "grilled_salmon", "51": "guacamole", "52": "gyoza", "53": "hamburger", "54": "hot_and_sour_soup", "55": "hot_dog", "56": "huevos_rancheros", "57": "hummus", "58": "ice_cream", "59": "lasagna", "60": "lobster_bisque", "61": "lobster_roll_sandwich", "62": "macaroni_and_cheese", "63": "macarons", "64": "miso_soup", "65": "mussels", "66": "nachos", "67": "omelette", "68": "onion_rings", "69": "oysters", "70": "pad_thai", "71": "paella", "72": "pancakes", "73": "panna_cotta", "74": "peking_duck", "75": "pho", "76": "pizza", "77": "pork_chop", "78": "poutine", "79": "prime_rib", "80": "pulled_pork_sandwich", "81": "ramen", "82": "ravioli", "83": "red_velvet_cake", "84": "risotto", "85": "samosa", "86": "sashimi", "87": "scallops", "88": "seaweed_salad", "89": "shrimp_and_grits", "90": "spaghetti_bolognese", "91": "spaghetti_carbonara", "92": "spring_rolls", "93": "steak", "94": "strawberry_shortcake", "95": "sushi", "96": "tacos", "97": "takoyaki", "98": "tiramisu", "99": "tuna_tartare", "100": "waffles"}'
