GPT 4 ChatGPT Project Euler

GPT-4 & ChatGPT – Project Euler

Exploration of the performance of GPT-4 and ChatGPT (both OpenAI) on Project Euler, a set of problems blending mathematical reasoning and programming.

Results

Here, I provided the text and equations (where necessary using LaTeX formatting, which GPT-4 and ChatGPT are able to parse) to represent Project Euler problems 1-30 as a prompt. For consistency, in all instances, I added a sentence requesting the solution in the form of a Python script. After evaluating this script against known, ground-truth baselines, I then prompted either GPT-4 or ChatGPT to try again, or moved onto the next problem.

I then modified the problems such that the concept and structure of the problem remained the same, but the particularities were changed (such as this example); this yielded some more interesting results (see Comments).

Here, green denotes ChatGPT finding the correct solution at first ask; orange at second ask; red means it did not find the solution. Grey means I couldn't find a good way of representing the problem, usually because it required understanding an image.

Prompting both GPT-4 and ChatGPT with the original problems also enables a direct comparison of their performance.

GPT-4 outperforms ChatGPT across matched problems.

Problem #	Ground-truth solution	ChatGPT solutions	GPT-4 solutions
Problem 1	problem 1 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 2	problem 2 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 3	problem 3 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 4	problem 4 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 5	problem 5 solution	first attempt - second attempt	first attempt
Problem 6	problem 6 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 7	problem 7 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 8	problem 8 solution	first attempt - second attempt	first attempt
Problem 9	problem 9 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 10	problem 10 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 11	problem 11 solution	first attempt - second attempt	first attempt - second attempt
Problem 12	problem 12 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 13	problem 13 solution	first attempt - second attempt	first attempt - second attempt
Problem 14	problem 14 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 15	problem 15 solution	n/a	n/a
Problem 16	problem 16 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 17	problem 17 solution	first attempt - second attempt	first attempt
Problem 18	problem 18 solution	n/a	first attempt
Problem 19	problem 19 solution	first attempt - second attempt	first attempt
Problem 20	problem 20 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 21	problem 21 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 22	problem 22 solution	n/a	n/a
Problem 23	problem 23 solution	first attempt - second attempt	first attempt
Problem 24	problem 24 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 25	problem 25 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 26	problem 26 solution	first attempt - second attempt	first attempt
Problem 27	problem 27 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 28	problem 28 solution	n/a	first attempt
Problem 29	problem 29 solution	first attempt	first attempt
Problem 30	problem 30 solution	first attempt	first attempt

Comments

GPT-4

The performance was undeniably impressive given the challenge of these problems (and significantly better than the performance of ChatGPT on matched promtps). The two problems for which GPT-4 failed to produce a working solution both involved parsing very long numbers (400 and 5000 digits, respectively), perhaps suggesting a failure of tokenisation rather than reasoning itself.

GPT-4 outperforms ChatGPT in terms of one-shot accuracy across a range of mathematical and programming problems.

ChatGPT

Performance was, in my opinion, quite impressive. ChatGPT did not (obviously) regurgitate code samples from its training dataset (none of the Python scripts generated matched any on Github or Gitlab), and sometimes made attempts to optimise the solution (e.g. using divide-and-conquer approaches in problem 19, or in problem 6 where it uses: $$sum_{k=1}^n k=frac{1}{2} n(n+1)$$ the expression for triangular numbers, without prompting).

As noted by others, the model struggles with very large numbers, even when they do not appreciably increase the conceptual difficulty of the problem (c.f. problem 13).

Finally, the modified problems yielded some insights. In a number of cases, the model generated a Python script that generated the correct answer (for the modified problem), but ChatGPT wrote the numerical answer from the original question. In other cases, it ignored the modified wording entirely, and provided me with a working solution to the original framing of the problem.