At first, no one had the habit of adding titles to links, but later, because of the popularization of W3C standards, they collectively added titles. From one extreme to another, many strange phenomena have occurred. In both aspects, the title in the first tag is not necessary, and the second title can be used on all tags except base, basefont, head, html, meta, param, script and title.
Put aside factors such as tag semantics and search engine friendliness, find several scenarios to analyze from a pure user perspective.
After the list content is truncated, it will be displayed in full through title. If there is no intercepted link at this time, it will be displayed again. Just imagine that the information that has been clearly seen will be triggered and prompted again to convey whether it feels very mother-in-law. If the link without intercepting control does not output the title, the effect may be much more reasonable. Or should the title not be at all at this time? I remember that good English websites seem to rarely do list interceptors.
The most typical auxiliary description of the icon illustration can maximize the balanced interface complexity and operability. In addition, for some operations with high awareness of the masses, if the graphics are transmitted to the position, you can use icon instead. For more interactive scenarios, please refer to the summary of whether the text or icon is completed in 2006.
Among the various entries of the navigation system, the main function of title is to make additional explanations. At the same time, it also corresponds to the principle of accessibility, requiring navigation to convey clear and concise suggestions. The operation is triggered after the user is interested, and the title prompts are given more details, emphasizing information guidance rather than pushing.
There are also cases of purpose guidance, which clearly informs users what this link is used for? Where to go? It is better to have some places that are prone to misunderstandings or are not very clear. In addition, title is not in the a tag, and is also widely used, such as forms. It can provide users with more accurate and appropriate operating guidance, and I think it can replace plain text prompts to a certain extent.
I put what I learned into practice and added a sentence to the comment template. I wanted to write it out when I modified it last time, but I felt it was redundant, and now it's much better. Users who are preparing to comment will naturally see that there is no compatibility problem with such rustic statements.
The corresponding bad applications are no longer shown and examples. There are countless examples on the Internet. In-depth analysis of semantics and usage can not only correct mistakes and explore ideas, but also penetrate many theoretical confusions. To sum up, title is not as simple as SEO practitioners advocate. From the user's perspective, it has three main uses: