papersnap
1.0.0
PapersNap 저장소에 오신 것을 환영합니다! 우리의 주요 목표는 연구 논문에서 중요한 정보를 추출하고 포괄적 인 마인드 맵으로 구성하는 것입니다. 이를 달성하기 위해 Claude라는 강력한 언어 모델을 활용하여 최대 100,000 개의 토큰으로 문서를 처리 할 수 있습니다.
계정 만들기 : 시작하려면 POE에 대한 계정이 있어야합니다.
PapersNap 봇 : https://poe.com/papersnap을 사용하십시오
논문 업로드 : 정보를 추출하려는 연구 논문을 준비하십시오. 용지를 PDF로 업로드하거나 복사하여 텍스트를 POE의 인터페이스에 직접 붙여 넣을 수 있습니다.
마인드 맵 생성 : 필요한 입력을 제공 한 후 PapersNap 봇이 마법을 작동시킵니다! 종이를 처리하고 Markdown에서 가장 중요한 정보가 포함 된 마인드 맵을 생성합니다.
결과보기 : PaperSNAP BOT가 분석을 완료하면 MarkDown에 마인드 맵이 제공됩니다. 이 마인드 맵을 사용자 친화적 인 형식으로 시각화하고 탐색하려면 MarkMap을 사용하는 것이 좋습니다.
계정 만들기 : 시작하려면 Claude에 대한 계정이 있어야합니다. 이미 가지고 있지 않은 경우 가입하십시오. 무료이며 쉽습니다 (미국, 영국)!
논문 업로드 : 정보를 추출하려는 연구 논문을 준비하십시오. 용지를 PDF로 업로드하거나 복사하여 텍스트를 Claude의 인터페이스에 직접 붙여 넣을 수 있습니다.
PapersNap 프롬프트 설정 : Claude 내에서 PaperSNAP 프롬프트를 붙여 넣습니다. 이 프롬프트는 주요 정보를 효과적으로 추출하는 데 Claude를 안내하도록 최적화되었습니다.
마인드 맵 생성 : 필요한 입력을 제공 한 후 Claude가 마법을 작동시킵니다! 종이를 처리하고 Markdown에서 가장 중요한 정보가 포함 된 마인드 맵을 생성합니다.
결과보기 : Claude가 분석을 완료하면 Markdown에 마인드 맵이 제공됩니다. 이 마인드 맵을 사용자 친화적 인 형식으로 시각화하고 탐색하려면 MarkMap을 사용하는 것이 좋습니다.
효율성 : 연구 논문에서 필수 세부 사항을 추출하는 데 시간이 많이 걸릴 수 있습니다. PapersNap 은이 프로세스를 자동화하여 소중한 시간과 노력을 절약 할 수 있습니다.
종합성 : PapersNap에서 생성 된 마인드 맵은 연구 논문의 주요 개념, 결과 및 통찰력에 대한 포괄적 인 개요를 제공합니다.
단순성 : PapersNap 및 Claude를 활용하면 복잡한 연구 논문을 신속하게 이해하기 쉬운 시각적 표현으로 신속하게 증류 할 수 있습니다.
우리는 Claude와 함께 PapersNap이 연구 논문 분석을 향상시키기위한 혁신적인 접근법을 제공한다고 생각합니다. 저장소를 탐색하고 위에서 설명한 단계를 따르고 PaperSNAP가 연구 과정을 간소화 할 수있는 방법을 알아보십시오.
문의, 피드백 또는 지원을 위해서는 주저하지 말고 저희에게 연락하십시오.
행복한 종이 분석 및 마인드 매핑!
Extract the following information from the paper :
# PAPERSNAPv1: {Exact title of the research paper}
## ? Citation Information:
- Author(s): Name all authors in sequence.
- Title: Exact title of the research paper.
- Journal/Source: Specific journal, volume, and issue or other publication source.
- Publication Year: Year the paper was published.
- Pages: Range of pages or article number.
- DOI/URL: Direct link or unique identifier.
- Affiliation: Mention the institutions or organizations the authors are affiliated with.
## ? Contextual Insight:
* In a Sentence: Condense the abstract into a single, easily understandable sentence.
* Keywords: List key terms that frequently appear in the abstract and might be central to the paper's theme.
- Gap/Need: Define the existing gap or need that the paper addresses. Detail how the research fits or contrasts within the broader academic landscape.
- Novelty: How does this research stand out from existing works? What's new or innovative about the methods, results, or conclusions?
- Target Audience: Who would benefit most from this research? Academics, industry professionals, policymakers, or the general public?
- Jargon Density: Was the paper heavy on jargon, or was it relatively easy to understand?
- Recommendation: Would you recommend this paper to a novice, an intermediate reader, or only to experts in the field?
## ? Purpose/Objective:
- Goal: Explicitly state the paper's primary aim or objective.
- Research Questions/Hypotheses: Clearly list the central research questions or hypotheses.
- Significance: Why did the authors feel this research was necessary? What larger issues does it hope to address or solve?
## ? Background Knowledge:
- Core Concepts: List foundational concepts that the paper frequently references or assumes the reader knows. Define them succinctly.
- Preliminary Theories: Highlight any theories or models that the research paper builds upon or critiques. Provide a brief description of each.
* Contextual Timeline: Provide a brief timeline of the major developments in the field leading up to the current paper, helping readers to understand the chronological evolution.
- Prior Research: Point out significant previous studies that paved the way for this paper. Mention their primary findings and relevance.
- Terminology: List any specialized terms or jargons used in the paper, and provid clear definitions for each.
- Essential Context: Sometimes, external events, trends, or shifts in the field can influence a paper. Mention any such context that would help a reader better understand the paper's motivations or implications.
## Methodology:
- Research Design & Rationale: Outlines step by step type, implications, and the reasoning behind design choices.
- Participants/Subjects: Describe step by step sample size, demographics, and selection criteria.
- Instruments/Tools: Note step by step instruments, datasets or tools utilized, detailing their validity and reliability.
- Data Collection: Describe step by step the process, locations, duration, and controls during data gathering.
- Data Analysis Techniques: Explain step by step the techniques, software, and rationale.
- Ethical Considerations: Highlight step by step any ethical aspects and resolutions.
- Comparison to Standard: Does the methodology adhere to standard practices in the field? If it deviates, how and why?
- Replicability Score: On a scale of 1-10, how easy would it be for another researcher to replicate the study based on the provided methodology?
## Main Results/Findings:
- List of metrics: list for each metric: definition, importance, implications, and contextual relevance.
- Graphs/Tables: Highlight any key graphs, figures, or tables that provide a significant understanding of the results. Provide a brief description of each.
- Outcomes: List primary outcomes or findings figures and tables.
- Data & Code Availability: Indicate whether the paper provides access to the data and code, which is essential for reproducibility and further research.
- Statistical Significance: Highlight if the findings were statistically significant and any p-values associated.
- Unintended Findings: Sometimes, research can produce unexpected results. Mention these serendipitous discoveries.
## Discussion & Interpretation:
- Authors' Views: Examine the authors' interpretations and implications.
- Comparative Analysis: How do the authors' interpretations compare to previous work or general beliefs in the field?
- Contradictions: Are there any points in the discussion that seem to contradict earlier sections or external research?
## Limitations:
- List: Mention any study weaknesses, constraints, and biases.
- Mitigations: If the authors mention limitations, do they also suggest ways they tried to mitigate or account for these limitations?
## ?️ Conclusions:
- Takeaways: Extract core conclusions and emergent themes.
- Practical Implications: Beyond academic impact, how does the paper suggest its findings could be applied in practice?
* Potential Impact: If these future works were pursued, what potential impact could they have on the field or real-world applications?
## Future Work:
- Authors' Proposals: Highlight the avenues for further research or follow-up studies as suggested specifically by the authors.
## References:
- Notable Citations: Highlight crucial references related to the paper's content or the reader's interest.
## Relevance:
- Significance: Describe how the paper relates to current trends or personal trajectories.
- Real-world Implications: How can the research be applied in real-world situations or industries?
## Textual Mind Map:
List all sections from the research paper. This will serve as the main branches of your mind map. In each section extract:
- Central Ideas: Under each section, pinpoint the predominant ideas. These will form the sub-branches connected to the main branches.
- Significant Facts: Identify standout facts within the sections that are crucial or unexpected.
- Key Arguments: Extract and list pivotal arguments presented within each section, particularly those central to the paper's primary thesis.
- Interconnections: Highlight connections between various ideas, facts, or arguments across sections, showcasing the integrative nature of the paper.
## ? Key Quotes:
- list significant statements or sentences that encapsulate crucial points or findings of the paper.
## ? Personal Insights/Comments:
- Opinions: Critique, praise, raise questions, or cross-reference with other known papers or information.
Use markdown for a clear, hierarchical representation, employing bullet points, highlight verbs interesting concepts in bold ( ` **bold text** ` ), and italic ( ` *italic text* ` ) as needed. keep icons and sections as defined.
