papersnap
1.0.0
¡Bienvenido al repositorio de Papersnap ! Nuestro objetivo principal es facilitar la extracción de información crucial de los trabajos de investigación y organizarla en un mapa mental integral. Para lograr esto, aprovechamos un poderoso modelo de idioma llamado Claude, que tiene la capacidad de manejar documentos con hasta 100,000 tokens.
Cree una cuenta: para comenzar, deberá tener una cuenta en POE.
Use Papersnap Bot: https://poe.com/papersnap
Cargue su artículo: prepare el trabajo de investigación del que desea extraer información. Puede cargar el papel como PDF o copiar y pegar su texto directamente en la interfaz de Poe.
Genere el mapa mental: después de proporcionar la entrada necesaria, ¡deje que Papersnap Bot funcione su magia! Procesará el documento y generará un mapa mental que contenga la información más importante en Markdown.
Ver el resultado: una vez que Papersnap Bot haya completado su análisis, se le presentará el mapa mental en Markdown. Para visualizar y explorar este mapa mental en un formato fácil de usar, recomendamos usar MarkMap.
Cree una cuenta: para comenzar, deberá tener una cuenta en Claude. Si aún no tiene uno, regístrese, ¡es gratis y fácil (EE. UU., Reino Unido)!
Cargue su artículo: prepare el trabajo de investigación del que desea extraer información. Puede cargar el papel como PDF o copiar y pegar su texto directamente en la interfaz de Claude.
Configure el mensaje de Papersnap: dentro de Claude, pegue el indicador de Papersnap. Este aviso ha sido optimizado para guiar a Claude en la extracción de información clave de manera efectiva.
Genere el mapa mental: después de proporcionar la entrada necesaria, ¡deje que Claude trabaje en su magia! Procesará el documento y generará un mapa mental que contenga la información más importante en Markdown.
Ver el resultado: una vez que Claude haya completado su análisis, se le presentará el mapa mental en Markdown. Para visualizar y explorar este mapa mental en un formato fácil de usar, recomendamos usar MarkMap.
Eficiencia: la extracción de detalles esenciales de los trabajos de investigación puede llevar mucho tiempo. Papersnap automatiza este proceso, ahorrándole tiempo y esfuerzo valiosos.
Exlave: el mapa mental generado por Papersnap proporciona una visión general integral de los conceptos, hallazgos y ideas clave del documento de investigación.
Simplicidad: al utilizar Papersnap y Claude, puede destilar rápidamente documentos de investigación complejos en representaciones visuales fáciles de entender.
Creemos que PapersNAP junto con Claude ofrece un enfoque innovador para mejorar el análisis de documentos de investigación. Siéntase libre de explorar nuestro repositorio, siga los pasos descritos anteriormente y descubra cómo PapersNAP puede optimizar su proceso de investigación.
Para cualquier consulta, comentarios o apoyo, no dude en comunicarse con nosotros.
¡Feliz análisis en papel y mapeo mental!
Extract the following information from the paper :
# PAPERSNAPv1: {Exact title of the research paper}
## ? Citation Information:
- Author(s): Name all authors in sequence.
- Title: Exact title of the research paper.
- Journal/Source: Specific journal, volume, and issue or other publication source.
- Publication Year: Year the paper was published.
- Pages: Range of pages or article number.
- DOI/URL: Direct link or unique identifier.
- Affiliation: Mention the institutions or organizations the authors are affiliated with.
## ? Contextual Insight:
* In a Sentence: Condense the abstract into a single, easily understandable sentence.
* Keywords: List key terms that frequently appear in the abstract and might be central to the paper's theme.
- Gap/Need: Define the existing gap or need that the paper addresses. Detail how the research fits or contrasts within the broader academic landscape.
- Novelty: How does this research stand out from existing works? What's new or innovative about the methods, results, or conclusions?
- Target Audience: Who would benefit most from this research? Academics, industry professionals, policymakers, or the general public?
- Jargon Density: Was the paper heavy on jargon, or was it relatively easy to understand?
- Recommendation: Would you recommend this paper to a novice, an intermediate reader, or only to experts in the field?
## ? Purpose/Objective:
- Goal: Explicitly state the paper's primary aim or objective.
- Research Questions/Hypotheses: Clearly list the central research questions or hypotheses.
- Significance: Why did the authors feel this research was necessary? What larger issues does it hope to address or solve?
## ? Background Knowledge:
- Core Concepts: List foundational concepts that the paper frequently references or assumes the reader knows. Define them succinctly.
- Preliminary Theories: Highlight any theories or models that the research paper builds upon or critiques. Provide a brief description of each.
* Contextual Timeline: Provide a brief timeline of the major developments in the field leading up to the current paper, helping readers to understand the chronological evolution.
- Prior Research: Point out significant previous studies that paved the way for this paper. Mention their primary findings and relevance.
- Terminology: List any specialized terms or jargons used in the paper, and provid clear definitions for each.
- Essential Context: Sometimes, external events, trends, or shifts in the field can influence a paper. Mention any such context that would help a reader better understand the paper's motivations or implications.
## Methodology:
- Research Design & Rationale: Outlines step by step type, implications, and the reasoning behind design choices.
- Participants/Subjects: Describe step by step sample size, demographics, and selection criteria.
- Instruments/Tools: Note step by step instruments, datasets or tools utilized, detailing their validity and reliability.
- Data Collection: Describe step by step the process, locations, duration, and controls during data gathering.
- Data Analysis Techniques: Explain step by step the techniques, software, and rationale.
- Ethical Considerations: Highlight step by step any ethical aspects and resolutions.
- Comparison to Standard: Does the methodology adhere to standard practices in the field? If it deviates, how and why?
- Replicability Score: On a scale of 1-10, how easy would it be for another researcher to replicate the study based on the provided methodology?
## Main Results/Findings:
- List of metrics: list for each metric: definition, importance, implications, and contextual relevance.
- Graphs/Tables: Highlight any key graphs, figures, or tables that provide a significant understanding of the results. Provide a brief description of each.
- Outcomes: List primary outcomes or findings figures and tables.
- Data & Code Availability: Indicate whether the paper provides access to the data and code, which is essential for reproducibility and further research.
- Statistical Significance: Highlight if the findings were statistically significant and any p-values associated.
- Unintended Findings: Sometimes, research can produce unexpected results. Mention these serendipitous discoveries.
## Discussion & Interpretation:
- Authors' Views: Examine the authors' interpretations and implications.
- Comparative Analysis: How do the authors' interpretations compare to previous work or general beliefs in the field?
- Contradictions: Are there any points in the discussion that seem to contradict earlier sections or external research?
## Limitations:
- List: Mention any study weaknesses, constraints, and biases.
- Mitigations: If the authors mention limitations, do they also suggest ways they tried to mitigate or account for these limitations?
## ?️ Conclusions:
- Takeaways: Extract core conclusions and emergent themes.
- Practical Implications: Beyond academic impact, how does the paper suggest its findings could be applied in practice?
* Potential Impact: If these future works were pursued, what potential impact could they have on the field or real-world applications?
## Future Work:
- Authors' Proposals: Highlight the avenues for further research or follow-up studies as suggested specifically by the authors.
## References:
- Notable Citations: Highlight crucial references related to the paper's content or the reader's interest.
## Relevance:
- Significance: Describe how the paper relates to current trends or personal trajectories.
- Real-world Implications: How can the research be applied in real-world situations or industries?
## Textual Mind Map:
List all sections from the research paper. This will serve as the main branches of your mind map. In each section extract:
- Central Ideas: Under each section, pinpoint the predominant ideas. These will form the sub-branches connected to the main branches.
- Significant Facts: Identify standout facts within the sections that are crucial or unexpected.
- Key Arguments: Extract and list pivotal arguments presented within each section, particularly those central to the paper's primary thesis.
- Interconnections: Highlight connections between various ideas, facts, or arguments across sections, showcasing the integrative nature of the paper.
## ? Key Quotes:
- list significant statements or sentences that encapsulate crucial points or findings of the paper.
## ? Personal Insights/Comments:
- Opinions: Critique, praise, raise questions, or cross-reference with other known papers or information.
Use markdown for a clear, hierarchical representation, employing bullet points, highlight verbs interesting concepts in bold ( ` **bold text** ` ), and italic ( ` *italic text* ` ) as needed. keep icons and sections as defined.
