papersnap
1.0.0
Selamat datang di repositori PapersNap ! Tujuan utama kami adalah untuk memfasilitasi ekstraksi informasi penting dari makalah penelitian dan mengaturnya menjadi peta pikiran yang komprehensif. Untuk mencapai hal ini, kami memanfaatkan model bahasa yang kuat bernama Claude, yang memiliki kemampuan untuk menangani dokumen dengan hingga 100.000 token.
Buat akun: Untuk memulai, Anda harus memiliki akun di Poe.
Gunakan bot papersnap: https://poe.com/papersnap
Unggah makalah Anda: Siapkan makalah penelitian yang ingin Anda ekstrak. Anda dapat mengunggah kertas sebagai PDF atau menyalin dan menempelkan teksnya langsung ke antarmuka Poe.
Hasilkan Peta Pikiran: Setelah memberikan input yang diperlukan, biarkan Bot Papersnap bekerja keajaibannya! Ini akan memproses kertas dan menghasilkan peta pikiran yang berisi informasi terpenting dalam penurunan harga.
Lihat hasilnya: Setelah Bot PapersNap telah menyelesaikan analisisnya, Anda akan disajikan dengan Peta Pikiran dalam Markdown. Untuk memvisualisasikan dan menjelajahi peta pikiran ini dalam format yang ramah pengguna, kami sarankan menggunakan MarkMap.
Buat akun: Untuk memulai, Anda harus memiliki akun di Claude. Jika Anda belum memilikinya, daftarlah - gratis dan mudah (AS, Inggris)!
Unggah makalah Anda: Siapkan makalah penelitian yang ingin Anda ekstrak. Anda dapat mengunggah kertas sebagai PDF atau menyalin dan menempelkan teksnya langsung ke antarmuka Claude.
Mengatur PapersNap Prompt: Di dalam Claude, Tempel Papersnap Prompt. Prompt ini telah dioptimalkan untuk memandu Claude dalam mengekstraksi informasi kunci secara efektif.
Hasilkan Peta Pikiran: Setelah memberikan input yang diperlukan, biarkan Claude mengerjakan keajaibannya! Ini akan memproses kertas dan menghasilkan peta pikiran yang berisi informasi terpenting dalam penurunan harga.
Lihat hasilnya: Setelah Claude menyelesaikan analisisnya, Anda akan disajikan dengan Peta Pikiran dalam Markdown. Untuk memvisualisasikan dan menjelajahi peta pikiran ini dalam format yang ramah pengguna, kami sarankan menggunakan MarkMap.
Efisiensi: Mengekstraksi detail penting dari makalah penelitian dapat memakan waktu. PapersNap mengotomatiskan proses ini, menghemat waktu dan usaha yang berharga.
Komprehensif: Peta pikiran yang dihasilkan oleh PapersNap memberikan tinjauan komprehensif tentang konsep, temuan, dan wawasan makalah penelitian.
Kesederhanaan: Dengan memanfaatkan Papersnap dan Claude, Anda dapat dengan cepat menyaring makalah penelitian yang kompleks menjadi representasi visual yang mudah dipahami.
Kami percaya bahwa Papersnap ditambah dengan Claude menawarkan pendekatan inovatif untuk meningkatkan analisis makalah penelitian. Jangan ragu untuk menjelajahi repositori kami, ikuti langkah -langkah yang diuraikan di atas, dan temukan bagaimana PapersNap dapat merampingkan proses penelitian Anda.
Untuk pertanyaan, umpan balik, atau dukungan apa pun, jangan ragu untuk menghubungi kami.
Analisis kertas yang bahagia dan pemetaan pikiran!
Extract the following information from the paper :
# PAPERSNAPv1: {Exact title of the research paper}
## ? Citation Information:
- Author(s): Name all authors in sequence.
- Title: Exact title of the research paper.
- Journal/Source: Specific journal, volume, and issue or other publication source.
- Publication Year: Year the paper was published.
- Pages: Range of pages or article number.
- DOI/URL: Direct link or unique identifier.
- Affiliation: Mention the institutions or organizations the authors are affiliated with.
## ? Contextual Insight:
* In a Sentence: Condense the abstract into a single, easily understandable sentence.
* Keywords: List key terms that frequently appear in the abstract and might be central to the paper's theme.
- Gap/Need: Define the existing gap or need that the paper addresses. Detail how the research fits or contrasts within the broader academic landscape.
- Novelty: How does this research stand out from existing works? What's new or innovative about the methods, results, or conclusions?
- Target Audience: Who would benefit most from this research? Academics, industry professionals, policymakers, or the general public?
- Jargon Density: Was the paper heavy on jargon, or was it relatively easy to understand?
- Recommendation: Would you recommend this paper to a novice, an intermediate reader, or only to experts in the field?
## ? Purpose/Objective:
- Goal: Explicitly state the paper's primary aim or objective.
- Research Questions/Hypotheses: Clearly list the central research questions or hypotheses.
- Significance: Why did the authors feel this research was necessary? What larger issues does it hope to address or solve?
## ? Background Knowledge:
- Core Concepts: List foundational concepts that the paper frequently references or assumes the reader knows. Define them succinctly.
- Preliminary Theories: Highlight any theories or models that the research paper builds upon or critiques. Provide a brief description of each.
* Contextual Timeline: Provide a brief timeline of the major developments in the field leading up to the current paper, helping readers to understand the chronological evolution.
- Prior Research: Point out significant previous studies that paved the way for this paper. Mention their primary findings and relevance.
- Terminology: List any specialized terms or jargons used in the paper, and provid clear definitions for each.
- Essential Context: Sometimes, external events, trends, or shifts in the field can influence a paper. Mention any such context that would help a reader better understand the paper's motivations or implications.
## Methodology:
- Research Design & Rationale: Outlines step by step type, implications, and the reasoning behind design choices.
- Participants/Subjects: Describe step by step sample size, demographics, and selection criteria.
- Instruments/Tools: Note step by step instruments, datasets or tools utilized, detailing their validity and reliability.
- Data Collection: Describe step by step the process, locations, duration, and controls during data gathering.
- Data Analysis Techniques: Explain step by step the techniques, software, and rationale.
- Ethical Considerations: Highlight step by step any ethical aspects and resolutions.
- Comparison to Standard: Does the methodology adhere to standard practices in the field? If it deviates, how and why?
- Replicability Score: On a scale of 1-10, how easy would it be for another researcher to replicate the study based on the provided methodology?
## Main Results/Findings:
- List of metrics: list for each metric: definition, importance, implications, and contextual relevance.
- Graphs/Tables: Highlight any key graphs, figures, or tables that provide a significant understanding of the results. Provide a brief description of each.
- Outcomes: List primary outcomes or findings figures and tables.
- Data & Code Availability: Indicate whether the paper provides access to the data and code, which is essential for reproducibility and further research.
- Statistical Significance: Highlight if the findings were statistically significant and any p-values associated.
- Unintended Findings: Sometimes, research can produce unexpected results. Mention these serendipitous discoveries.
## Discussion & Interpretation:
- Authors' Views: Examine the authors' interpretations and implications.
- Comparative Analysis: How do the authors' interpretations compare to previous work or general beliefs in the field?
- Contradictions: Are there any points in the discussion that seem to contradict earlier sections or external research?
## Limitations:
- List: Mention any study weaknesses, constraints, and biases.
- Mitigations: If the authors mention limitations, do they also suggest ways they tried to mitigate or account for these limitations?
## ?️ Conclusions:
- Takeaways: Extract core conclusions and emergent themes.
- Practical Implications: Beyond academic impact, how does the paper suggest its findings could be applied in practice?
* Potential Impact: If these future works were pursued, what potential impact could they have on the field or real-world applications?
## Future Work:
- Authors' Proposals: Highlight the avenues for further research or follow-up studies as suggested specifically by the authors.
## References:
- Notable Citations: Highlight crucial references related to the paper's content or the reader's interest.
## Relevance:
- Significance: Describe how the paper relates to current trends or personal trajectories.
- Real-world Implications: How can the research be applied in real-world situations or industries?
## Textual Mind Map:
List all sections from the research paper. This will serve as the main branches of your mind map. In each section extract:
- Central Ideas: Under each section, pinpoint the predominant ideas. These will form the sub-branches connected to the main branches.
- Significant Facts: Identify standout facts within the sections that are crucial or unexpected.
- Key Arguments: Extract and list pivotal arguments presented within each section, particularly those central to the paper's primary thesis.
- Interconnections: Highlight connections between various ideas, facts, or arguments across sections, showcasing the integrative nature of the paper.
## ? Key Quotes:
- list significant statements or sentences that encapsulate crucial points or findings of the paper.
## ? Personal Insights/Comments:
- Opinions: Critique, praise, raise questions, or cross-reference with other known papers or information.
Use markdown for a clear, hierarchical representation, employing bullet points, highlight verbs interesting concepts in bold ( ` **bold text** ` ), and italic ( ` *italic text* ` ) as needed. keep icons and sections as defined.
