Recently, OpenAI has continued to face a wave of executive resignations, which has attracted widespread attention in the industry. Following the departure of the head of the Super Alignment team, security policy consultant and AGI readiness team leader Mil Brundage also announced his departure from OpenAI and revealed that the team he led would be disbanded. This series of personnel changes not only impacts OpenAI's internal structure, but also raises many questions about its future development direction and internal cultural mechanisms. The editor of Downcodes will provide an in-depth explanation of this and analyze its potential impact.
Recently, OpenAI has reported another resignation. Miles Brundage, security policy consultant and leader of the AGI preparation team, announced that he will leave the company and revealed that the team he leads will also be disbanded and members will be reassigned to other departments. .
Brundage explained his decision in detail in a post on social media platform X. He said that the main reason for leaving OpenAI was to have more independence and the freedom to publish research.
It’s worth noting that Brundage is not the only security researcher to leave the company at a high level. As early as May this year, OpenAI disbanded its Super Alignment team, which was mainly responsible for risk assessment of artificial super intelligence. Since then, the two leaders of the team, Jan Leike and Ilya Sutsver, have also left.
In addition, the company’s chief technology officer Mira Murati, chief research officer Bob McGrew and vice president of research Barret Zoph and other senior executives They have also left recently.
For the past six years, Brundage has been advising management and the board of directors at OpenAI to help the company prepare for the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence. His contributions to security research cannot be underestimated, including the introduction of an external red teaming mechanism, which allows external experts to participate in detecting potential problems in OpenAI products.
Brundage mentioned that he and OpenAI disagreed over the limitations of the research release, and felt that these limitations were increasingly difficult to accept. He believes that his work within OpenAI has affected his research objectivity, making it difficult for him to remain impartial on the future of AI policy. He also mentioned on social media that there is a common view within OpenAI that "the price of speaking out is high, and only some people can do it."
The departure of this series of senior executives has not only drawn more attention to OpenAI's future direction, but also raised more questions about its internal culture and decision-making mechanism.
Highlight:
Brundage announced his departure from OpenAI, and the AGI preparation team will also be disbanded.
He wants more freedom to publish research, reflecting disagreements with companies over research restrictions.
Recently, many senior executives have resigned, and the outside world has paid attention to OpenAI's future development and internal culture.
OpenAI’s continued departures of senior executives have raised deep concerns about the company’s future, its internal culture, and the direction of its AI safety research. Does this herald the beginning of a new round of reshuffle in the AI industry? Subsequent developments deserve continued attention.