scattertext
0.0.2.4.4
Una herramienta para encontrar términos distintivos en corpus y mostrarlos en una trama de dispersión HTML interactiva. Los puntos correspondientes a los términos se etiquetan selectivamente para que no se superpongan con otras etiquetas o puntos.
Cite AS: Jason S. Kessler. ScatterText: una herramienta basada en el navegador para visualizar cómo difieren los corpus. Demostraciones del sistema de ACL. 2017.
A continuación se muestra un ejemplo del uso de scatterText para crear los términos visualizados utilizados en las convenciones políticas estadounidenses de 2012. Los 2,000 uni gramos más asociados a la fiesta se muestran como puntos en la trama de dispersión. Sus ejes X e Y son las densas filas de su uso por los oradores republicanos y democráticos, respectivamente.
import scattertext as st
df = st.SampleCorpora.ConventionData2012.get_data().assign(
parse=lambda df: df.text.apply(st.whitespace_nlp_with_sentences)
)
corpus = st.CorpusFromParsedDocuments(
df, category_col='party', parsed_col='parse'
).build().get_unigram_corpus().compact(st.AssociationCompactor(2000))
html = st.produce_scattertext_explorer(
corpus,
category='democrat',
category_name='Democratic',
not_category_name='Republican',
minimum_term_frequency=0,
pmi_threshold_coefficient=0,
width_in_pixels=1000,
metadata=corpus.get_df()['speaker'],
transform=st.Scalers.dense_rank,
include_gradient=True,
left_gradient_term='More Republican',
middle_gradient_term='Metric: Dense Rank Difference',
right_gradient_term='More Democratic',
)
open('./demo_compact.html', 'w').write(html)
El archivo HTML escrito se vería como la imagen a continuación. Haga clic en él para la visualización interactiva real.
Jason S. Kessler. ScatterText: una herramienta basada en el navegador para visualizar cómo difieren los corpus. Demostraciones del sistema de ACL. 2017. Enlace al documento: arxiv.org/abs/1703.00565
@article{kessler2017scattertext,
author = {Kessler, Jason S.},
title = {Scattertext: a Browser-Based Tool for Visualizing how Corpora Differ},
booktitle = {Proceedings of ACL-2017 System Demonstrations},
year = {2017},
address = {Vancouver, Canada},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
}
Tabla de contenido
Instalación
Descripción general
Personalizar la visualización y trazar la dispersión
Tutorial
Comprensión de la puntuación F escalada
Métodos de puntuación de términos alternativos
El proceso de parcela de posición-selección
Usos avanzados
Ejemplos
Una nota sobre el diseño del gráfico
Qué hay de nuevo
Fuentes
Instale Python 3.11 o superior y ejecute:
$ pip install scattertext
Si no puede (o no quiere) instalar Spacy, sustituya las líneas nlp = spacy.load('en') con nlp = scattertext.WhitespaceNLP.whitespace_nlp . Tenga en cuenta que esto no es compatible con word_similarity_explorer , y las capacidades de detección de límites de tokenización y oración serán expresiones regulares de bajo rendimiento. Consulte demo_without_spacy.py para un ejemplo.
Se recomienda que instale jieba , spacy , empath , astropy , flashtext , gensim y umap-learn para aprovechar al máximo el spattertext.
Scattertext debería funcionar principalmente con Python 2.7, pero puede que no.
Las salidas HTML se ven mejor en Chrome y Safari.
El nombre de este proyecto es ScatterText. "ScatterText" está escrito como una sola palabra y debe capitalizarse. Cuando se usa en Python, el paquete scattertext debe definirse al nombre st , es decir, import scattertext as st .
Esta es una herramienta destinada a visualizar qué palabras y frases son más características de una categoría que otras.
Considere el ejemplo en la parte superior de la página.
Mirar esto parece abrumador. De hecho, es una visualización relativamente simple del uso de palabras durante la Convención Política de 2012. Cada punto corresponde a una palabra o frase mencionada por republicanos o demócratas durante sus convenciones. Cuanto más cercano sea un punto en la parte superior de la trama, más frecuentemente fue utilizado por los demócratas. Cuanto más bien un punto, más los republicanos usaron la palabra o frase. Las palabras utilizadas con frecuencia por ambas partes, como "de" e "el" e incluso "mitt" tienden a ocurrir en la esquina superior derecha. Aunque se han ocultado palabras de muy baja frecuencia para preservar los recursos informáticos, una palabra que ninguna de las partes usó, como "jirafa" estaría en la esquina inferior izquierda.
Las cosas interesantes suceden cerca de las esquinas de la parte superior izquierda y la parte inferior de la derecha. En la esquina superior izquierda, las palabras como "Auto" (como en el rescate automotriz) y "millonarios" son utilizadas con frecuencia por los demócratas pero con poca frecuencia o nunca utilizados por los republicanos. Del mismo modo, los términos frecuentemente utilizados por los republicanos y con poca frecuencia por los demócratas ocupan la esquina inferior derecha. Estos incluyen "gran gobierno" y "Juegos Olímpicos", que se refieren a los Juegos Olímpicos de Salt Lake City en los que estaba involucrado el gobernador Romney.
Los términos son coloreados por su asociación. Los que están más asociados con los demócratas son azules y los más asociados con los republicanos rojos.
Los términos más característicos de los dos conjuntos de documentos se muestran en la extrema derecha de la visualización.
La inspiración para esta visualización provino de Dataclysm (Rudder, 2014).
ScatterText está diseñado para ayudarlo a construir estos gráficos y etiquetarlos de manera eficiente en ellos.
La documentación (incluido este readme) es un trabajo en progreso. Consulte el tutorial a continuación, así como el tutorial PyData 2017.
Empacarse en el código y las pruebas debería darle una buena idea de cómo funcionan las cosas.
La biblioteca cubre algunas fórmulas novedosas y efectivas de importancia de términos, incluida la puntuación F escalada .
Nuevo en ScatterText 0.1.0, se puede usar un marco de datos para posiciones de término/metadatos y otros datos específicos del término. También podemos usarlo para determinar la información específica del término que se muestra después de hacer clic un término.
Tenga en cuenta que es posible deshabilitar el uso de categorías de documentos en ScatterText, como veremos en este ejemplo.
Este ejemplo cubre la dispersión del término contra la frecuencia de las palabras e identificando los términos que se dispersan más y menos dadas sus frecuencias. Usando la medida de dispersión de Rosengren (Gries 2021), los términos tienden a aumentar en sus puntajes de dispersión a medida que se vuelven más frecuentes. Veremos cómo podemos trazar este efecto y factorizar el efecto de la frecuencia.
Esto, junto con una serie de otras métricas de dispersión presentadas en Gries (2021), están disponibles y se documentan en la clase Dispersion , que usaremos más adelante en la sección.
Comencemos creando un corpus de convenciones, pero utilizaremos el CorpusWithoutCategoriesFromParsedDocuments de fábrica de Documentos de Parparsed para garantizar que no se incluyan categorías en el corpus. Si intentamos encontrar categorías de documentos, veremos que todos los documentos tienen la categoría '_'.
import scattertext as st
df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data (). assign (
parse = lambda df : df . text . apply ( st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences ))
corpus = st . CorpusWithoutCategoriesFromParsedDocuments (
df , parsed_col = 'parse'
). build (). get_unigram_corpus (). remove_infrequent_words ( minimum_term_count = 6 )
corpus . get_categories ()
# Returns ['_']A continuación, crearemos un marco de datos para todos los términos que trazaremos. Comenzaremos creando un marco de datos donde capturamos la frecuencia de cada término y varias métricas de dispersión. Estos se mostrarán después de que se active un término en la gráfica.
dispersion = st . Dispersion ( corpus )
dispersion_df = dispersion . get_df ()
dispersion_df . head ( 3 )Que devuelve
Frequency Range SD VC Juilland's D Rosengren's S DP DP norm KL-divergence Dissemination
thank 363 134 3.108113 1.618274 0.707416 0.694898 0.391548 0.391560 0.748808 0.972954
you 1630 177 12.383708 1.435902 0.888596 0.898805 0.233627 0.233635 0.263337 0.963905
so 549 155 3.523380 1.212967 0.774299 0.822244 0.283151 0.283160 0.411750 0.986423```
These are discussed in detail in [Gries 2021](http://www.stgries.info/research/ToApp_STG_Dispersion_PHCL.pdf).
Dissementation is presented in Altmann et al. (2011).
We'll use Rosengren's S to find the dispersion of each term. It's which a metric designed for corpus parts
(convention speeches in our case) of varying length. Where n is the number of documents in the corpus, s_i is the
percentage of tokens in the corpus found in document i, v_i is term count in document i, and f is the total number
of tokens in the corpus of type term type.
Rosengren's
S: [^2}{f})](https://render.githubusercontent.com/render/math?math=frac{Sum_{i=1}^{n}sqrt{s_i%20cdot%20v_i})
^2}{f})
In order to start plotting, we'll need to add coordinates for each term to the data frame.
To use the `dataframe_scattertext` function, you need, at a minimum a dataframe with 'X' and 'Y' columns.
The `Xpos` and `Ypos` columns indicate the positions of the original `X` and `Y` values on the scatterplot, and
need to be between 0 and 1. Functions in `st.Scalers` perform this scaling. Absent `Xpos` or `Ypos`,
`st.Scalers.scale` would be used.
Here is a sample of values:
* `st.Scalers.scale(vec)` Rescales the vector to where the minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 1.
* `st.Scalers.log_scale(vec)` Rescales the lgo of the vector
* `st.Scalers.dense_ranke(vec)` Rescales the dense rank of the vector
* `st.Scalers.scale_center_zero_abs(vec)` Rescales a vector with both positive and negative values such that the 0 value
in the original vector is plotted at 0.5, negative values are projected from [-argmax(abs(vec)), 0] to [0, 0.5] and
positive values projected from [0, argmax(abs(vec))] to [0.5, 1].
```python
dispersion_df = dispersion_df.assign(
X=lambda df: df.Frequency,
Xpos=lambda df: st.Scalers.log_scale(df.X),
Y=lambda df: df["Rosengren's S"],
Ypos=lambda df: st.Scalers.scale(df.Y),
)
Tenga en cuenta que la columna Ypos aquí no es necesaria ya que Y se escalará automáticamente.
Finalmente, dado que no estamos distinguiendo entre categorías, podemos establecer ignore_categories=True .
Ahora podemos trazar este gráfico usando la función dataframe_scattertext :
html = st . dataframe_scattertext (
corpus ,
plot_df = dispersion_df ,
metadata = corpus . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ] + ' (' + corpus . get_df ()[ 'party' ]. str . upper () + ')' ,
ignore_categories = True ,
x_label = 'Log Frequency' ,
y_label = "Rosengren's S" ,
y_axis_labels = [ 'Less Dispersion' , 'Medium' , 'More Dispersion' ],
)Lo que produce (haga clic para obtener una versión interactiva):
Tenga en cuenta que podemos ver varias estadísticas de dispersión bajo el nombre de un término, además de las estadísticas de uso estándar. Para personalizar las estadísticas que se muestran, establezca el parámetro term_description_column=[...] con una lista de nombres de columnas que se mostrarán.
Un problema en este gráfico de dispersión, que tiende a ser común a las métricas de dispersión en general, es que la dispersión y la frecuencia tienden a tener una alta correlación, pero con una curva compleja no lineal. Dependiendo de la métrica, esta curva de correlación podría ser potencia, lineal, sigmoidal o típicamente, otra cosa.
Para tener en cuenta esta correlación, podemos predecir la dispersión de la frecuencia utilizando un regresor no paramétrico, y ver qué términos tienen los residuos más altos y más bajos con respecto a sus dispersiones esperadas en función de sus frecuencias.
En este caso, usaremos un regresor KNN con 10 vecinos para predecir las frecuencias de los términos de Rosengren ( dispersion_df.X y .Y respectivamente), y calcular el residual.
Los puntos de color residuales a color, con un color neutro para residuos alrededor de 0 y otros colores para valores positivos y negativos. Agregaremos una columna en el marco de datos para colores de puntos y lo llamaremos Colorscore. Está poblado con valores entre 0 y 1, con 0.5 como color de neturos en la escala de color d3 interpolateWarm . Utilizamos st.Scalers.scale_center_zero_abs , discutido anteriormente, para hacer esta transformación.
from sklearn . neighbors import KNeighborsRegressor
dispersion_df = dispersion_df . assign (
Expected = lambda df : KNeighborsRegressor ( n_neighbors = 10 ). fit (
df . X . values . reshape ( - 1 , 1 ), df . Y
). predict ( df . X . values . reshape ( - 1 , 1 )),
Residual = lambda df : df . Y - df . Expected ,
ColorScore = lambda df : st . Scalers . scale_center_zero_abs ( df . Residual )
) Ahora estamos listos para trazar nuestra tabla de dispersión de colores. Asignamos el nombre de la columna ColorScore al parámetro color_score_column en dataframe_scattertext .
Además, nos gustaría poblar las dos listas de términos a la izquierda con términos que tienen valores residuales altos y bajos, lo que indica términos que tienen la mayor dispersión en relación con su nivel esperado y el más bajo. Podemos hacer esto por el parámetro left_list_column . Podemos especificar los nombres de la lista de términos superior e inferior utilizando el parámetro header_names . Finalmente, podemos escapar de la trama agregando un color de fondo atractivo.
html = st . dataframe_scattertext (
corpus ,
plot_df = dispersion_df ,
metadata = corpus . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ] + ' (' + corpus . get_df ()[ 'party' ]. str . upper () + ')' ,
ignore_categories = True ,
x_label = 'Log Frequency' ,
y_label = "Rosengren's S" ,
y_axis_labels = [ 'Less Dispersion' , 'Medium' , 'More Dispersion' ],
color_score_column = 'ColorScore' ,
header_names = { 'upper' : 'Lower than Expected' , 'lower' : 'More than Expected' },
left_list_column = 'Residual' ,
background_color = '#e5e5e3'
)Lo que produce (haga clic para obtener una versión interactiva):
Si bien debe aprender Python Usar SCATTERTEXT, he puesto parte de la funcionalidad básica en una herramienta de línea de comandos. La herramienta se instala cuando sigue el procedimiento establecido anteriormente.
Ejecutar $ scattertext --help desde la línea de comandos para ver la información de uso completo. Aquí hay un ejemplo rápido de cómo usar Vanilla ScatterText en un archivo CSV. El archivo debe tener al menos dos columnas, una que contenga el texto para analizar y otro que contenga la categoría. En el ejemplo de CSV a continuación, las columnas son texto y fiesta, respectivamente.
El siguiente ejemplo procesa el archivo CSV y la visualización HTML resultante en cli_demo.html.
Tenga en cuenta que el parámetro --minimum_term_frequency=8 omitir los términos que ocurren menos de 8 veces, y --regex_parser indica que se debe usar un analizador de expresión regular simple en lugar de Spacy. El indicador --one_use_per_doc indica que la frecuencia del término debe calcularse solo contando no más de un ocurrencia de un término en un documento.
Si desea analizar el texto que no es inglés, puede usar el argumento --spacy_language_model para configurar qué modelo de lenguaje espacial utilizará la herramienta. El valor predeterminado es 'EN' y puede ver los otros disponibles en https://spacy.io/docs/api/language-models.
$ curl -s https://cdn.rawgit.com/JasonKessler/scattertext/master/scattertext/data/political_data.csv | head -2
party,speaker,text
democrat,BARACK OBAMA, " Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much.Thank you.Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you.
$
$ scattertext --datafile=https://cdn.rawgit.com/JasonKessler/scattertext/master/scattertext/data/political_data.csv
> --text_column=text --category_column=party --metadata_column=speaker --positive_category=democrat
> --category_display_name=Democratic --not_category_display_name=Republican --minimum_term_frequency=8
> --one_use_per_doc --regex_parser --outputfile=cli_demo.htmlEl siguiente código crea un archivo HTML independiente que analiza las palabras utilizadas por demócratas y republicanos en las convenciones del Partido de 2012, y genera algunas asociaciones de términos notables.
Primero, importe ScatterText y Spacy.
>>> import scattertext as st
>>> import spacy
>>> from pprint import pprint
A continuación, ensamble los datos que desea analizar en un marco de datos de Pandas. Debe tener al menos dos columnas, el texto que le gustaría analizar y la categoría que le gustaría estudiar. Aquí, la columna text contiene discursos de la convención, mientras que la columna party contiene la fiesta del orador. Eventualmente usaremos la columna speaker para etiquetar los fragmentos en la visualización.
>>> convention_df = st.SampleCorpora.ConventionData2012.get_data()
>>> convention_df.iloc[0]
party democrat
speaker BARACK OBAMA
text Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so ...
Name: 0, dtype: object
Convierta el marco de datos en un corpus de scattertext para comenzar a analizarlo. Para buscar diferencias en las partes, establezca el parámetro category_col en 'party' y use los discursos, presentes en la columna text , como los textos para analizar estableciendo el parámetro text col. Finalmente, pase un modelo de Spacy al argumento nlp y llame build() para construir el corpus.
# Turn it into a Scattertext Corpus
>>> nlp = spacy.load('en')
>>> corpus = st.CorpusFromPandas(convention_df,
... category_col='party',
... text_col='text',
... nlp=nlp).build()
Veamos términos característicos en el corpus, y términos que son la mayoría de los demócratas y republicanos asociados. Vea las diapositivas 52 a 59 del contenido no estructurado de los núcleos de ideas que hablan para obtener más detalles sobre estos enfoques.
Estos son los términos que diferencian el corpus de un corpus general en inglés.
>>> print(list(corpus.get_scaled_f_scores_vs_background().index[:10]))
['obama',
'romney',
'barack',
'mitt',
'obamacare',
'biden',
'romneys',
'hardworking',
'bailouts',
'autoworkers']
Estos son los términos que están más asociados con los demócratas:
>>> term_freq_df = corpus.get_term_freq_df()
>>> term_freq_df['Democratic Score'] = corpus.get_scaled_f_scores('democrat')
>>> pprint(list(term_freq_df.sort_values(by='Democratic Score', ascending=False).index[:10]))
['auto',
'america forward',
'auto industry',
'insurance companies',
'pell',
'last week',
'pell grants',
"women 's",
'platform',
'millionaires']
Y republicanos:
>>> term_freq_df['Republican Score'] = corpus.get_scaled_f_scores('republican')
>>> pprint(list(term_freq_df.sort_values(by='Republican Score', ascending=False).index[:10]))
['big government',
"n't build",
'mitt was',
'the constitution',
'he wanted',
'hands that',
'of mitt',
'16 trillion',
'turned around',
'in florida']
Ahora, escribamos el trazado de dispersión un archivo HTML independiente. Haremos la categoría de eje Y "demócrata" y nombraremos la categoría "demócrata" con una capital "D" para fines de presentación. Nombraremos la otra categoría "republicana" con una capital "r". Todos los documentos en el corpus sin la categoría "demócrata" se considerarán republicanos. Establecemos el ancho de la visualización en píxeles y etiquetamos cada extracto con el altavoz utilizando el parámetro metadata . Finalmente, escribimos la visualización en un archivo HTML.
>>> html = st.produce_scattertext_explorer(corpus,
... category='democrat',
... category_name='Democratic',
... not_category_name='Republican',
... width_in_pixels=1000,
... metadata=convention_df['speaker'])
>>> open("Convention-Visualization.html", 'wb').write(html.encode('utf-8'))
A continuación se muestra la página web. Haga clic y espere unos minutos para ver la versión interactiva.
ScatterText también se puede utilizar para visualizar la asociación de categorías de una variedad de diferentes tipos de frases. La palabra "frase" denota cualquier colocación única o de múltiples palabras.
Pytextrank, creado por Paco Nathan, es una implementación de una versión modificada del algoritmo TexTrank (Mihalcea y Tarau 2004). Implica un algoritmo de centralidad gráfica para extraer una lista puntuada de las frases más destacadas en un documento. Aquí, entidades nombradas reconocidas por Spacy. A partir de la versión 2.2 de Spacy, estos son de un sistema NER capacitado en Ontonotes 5.
Instale pytextrank $ pip3 install pytextrank antes de continuar con este tutorial.
Para usar, construya un corpus como normal, pero asegúrese de usar Spacy para analizar cada documento en lugar de un tokenizador de tipo whitespace_nlp incorporado. Tenga en cuenta que no se necesita agregar PytexTrank a la tubería de Spacy, ya que el objeto PyTextRankPhrases se ejecutará por separado. Reduciremos la cantidad de frases que se muestran en la tabla a 2000 utilizando el AssociationCompactor . Las frases generadas se tratarán como características no textuales, ya que sus puntajes de documentos no corresponderán a los recuentos de palabras.
import pytextrank, spacy
import scattertext as st
nlp = spacy.load('en')
nlp.add_pipe("textrank", last=True)
convention_df = st.SampleCorpora.ConventionData2012.get_data().assign(
parse=lambda df: df.text.apply(nlp),
party=lambda df: df.party.apply({'democrat': 'Democratic', 'republican': 'Republican'}.get)
)
corpus = st.CorpusFromParsedDocuments(
convention_df,
category_col='party',
parsed_col='parse',
feats_from_spacy_doc=st.PyTextRankPhrases()
).build(
).compact(
AssociationCompactor(2000, use_non_text_features=True)
)
Tenga en cuenta que los términos presentes en el corpus son entidades nombradas y, en oposición a los recuentos de frecuencia, sus puntajes son las puntuaciones propias que les asignan el algoritmo de TexTrank. Ejecutar corpus.get_metadata_freq_df('') devolverá, para cada categoría, las suma de los términos 'TEXTRANK Puntores. Los rangos densos de estos puntajes se utilizarán para construir la gráfica de dispersión.
term_category_scores = corpus.get_metadata_freq_df('')
print(term_category_scores)
'''
Democratic Republican
term
our future 1.113434 0.699103
your country 0.314057 0.000000
their home 0.385925 0.000000
our government 0.185483 0.462122
our workers 0.199704 0.210989
her family 0.540887 0.405552
our time 0.510930 0.410058
...
'''
Antes de construir la gráfica, vamos a algunas variables auxiliares ya que las puntuaciones agregadas de Textrank no son particularmente interpretables, mostraremos el rango por categoría de cada puntaje en el campo metadata_description . Estos se mostrarán después de hacer clic en un término.
term_ranks = pd.DataFrame(
np.argsort(np.argsort(-term_category_scores, axis=0), axis=0) + 1,
columns=term_category_scores.columns,
index=term_category_scores.index)
metadata_descriptions = {
term: '<br/>' + '<br/>'.join(
'<b>%s</b> TextRank score rank: %s/%s' % (cat, term_ranks.loc[term, cat], corpus.get_num_metadata())
for cat in corpus.get_categories())
for term in corpus.get_metadata()
}
Podemos construir puntajes de términos de un par de maneras. Una es una diferencia estándar de rango denso, una puntuación que se usa en la mayoría de las gráficas de contrastes de dos categorías aquí, lo que nos dará las frases más asociadas a la categoría. Otro es utilizar la puntuación máxima específica de la categoría, esto nos dará las frases más prominentes en cada categoría, independientemente de la prominencia en la otra categoría. Tomaremos ambos enfoques en este tutorial, calculemos el segundo tipo de puntaje, la prominencia específica de la categoría a continuación.
category_specific_prominence = term_category_scores.apply(
lambda r: r.Democratic if r.Democratic > r.Republican else -r.Republican,
axis=1
)
Ahora estamos listos para salir este gráfico. Tenga en cuenta que usamos una transformación dense_rank , que coloca frases idénticamente clandestres una sobre la otra. Usamos category_specific_prominence como puntajes, y establecemos sort_by_dist como False para garantizar que las frases que se muestran en el lado derecho de la tabla se clasifican por las puntuaciones y no la distancia a las esquinas de la parte superior izquierda o la derecha inferior. Dado que las frases coincidentes se tratan como características que no son de texto, las codificamos como modelos de temas de frase única y establecemos el topic_model_preview_size a 0 para indicar que la lista de modelos de temas no se debe mostrar. Finalmente, establecemos asegurarnos de que se muestren los documentos completos. Nota Los documentos se mostrarán en orden de puntaje específico de frases.
html = produce_scattertext_explorer(
corpus,
category='Democratic',
not_category_name='Republican',
minimum_term_frequency=0,
pmi_threshold_coefficient=0,
width_in_pixels=1000,
transform=dense_rank,
metadata=corpus.get_df()['speaker'],
scores=category_specific_prominence,
sort_by_dist=False,
use_non_text_features=True,
topic_model_term_lists={term: [term] for term in corpus.get_metadata()},
topic_model_preview_size=0,
metadata_descriptions=metadata_descriptions,
use_full_doc=True
)
Los términos más asociados en cada categoría tienen algún sentido, al menos en un análisis post hoc. Al referirse al (entonces) gobernador Romney, los demócratas usaron su apellido "Romney" en sus menciones más centrales de él, mientras que los republicanos usaron el "guante" más familiar y humanizante. En términos del presidente Obama, la frase "Obama" tampoco apareció como un término superior en el primer nombre, pero el primer nombre "Barack" fue una de las frases más centrales en los discursos democráticos, reflejando "guante".
Alternativamente, podemos una densa diferencia de rango en los puntajes para colorear puntos de frase y determinar las frases superiores que se mostrarán en el lado derecho de la tabla. En lugar de establecer scores como puntajes de prominencia específicos de categoría, establecemos term_scorer=RankDifference() para inyectar una manera de determinar los puntajes de los términos en el proceso de creación de gráficos de dispersión.
html = produce_scattertext_explorer(
corpus,
category='Democratic',
not_category_name='Republican',
minimum_term_frequency=0,
pmi_threshold_coefficient=0,
width_in_pixels=1000,
transform=dense_rank,
use_non_text_features=True,
metadata=corpus.get_df()['speaker'],
term_scorer=RankDifference(),
sort_by_dist=False,
topic_model_term_lists={term: [term] for term in corpus.get_metadata()},
topic_model_preview_size=0,
metadata_descriptions=metadata_descriptions,
use_full_doc=True
)
Phrasemachine de Abehandler (Handler et al. 2016) utiliza expresiones regulares sobre secuencias de etiquetas de parte de voz para identificar frases sustantivas. Esto tiene la ventaja sobre el uso de NP-Chunking de Spacy, ya que tiende a isolotar fases de sustantivos significativas y grandes que están libres de apositivos.
A opuesto a pytextrank, solo usaremos los recuentos de estas frases, tratándolas como cualquier otro término.
import spacy
from scattertext import SampleCorpora, PhraseMachinePhrases, dense_rank, RankDifference, AssociationCompactor, produce_scattertext_explorer
from scattertext.CorpusFromPandas import CorpusFromPandas
corpus = (CorpusFromPandas(SampleCorpora.ConventionData2012.get_data(),
category_col='party',
text_col='text',
feats_from_spacy_doc=PhraseMachinePhrases(),
nlp=spacy.load('en', parser=False))
.build().compact(AssociationCompactor(4000)))
html = produce_scattertext_explorer(corpus,
category='democrat',
category_name='Democratic',
not_category_name='Republican',
minimum_term_frequency=0,
pmi_threshold_coefficient=0,
transform=dense_rank,
metadata=corpus.get_df()['speaker'],
term_scorer=RankDifference(),
width_in_pixels=1000)
En Scattertext, varias métricas, incluidas las asociaciones de términos, a menudo se muestran de dos maneras. El primero y más importante es la posición en el gráfico. El segundo es el color de un punto o texto. En ScatterText 0.2.21, se introduce una forma de visualizar la semántica de estos puntajes: el gradiente como clave.
El gradiente, por defecto, sigue el parámetro d3_color_scale de produce_scattertext_explorer que es d3.interpolateRdYlBu de forma predeterminada.
Los siguientes parámetros adicionales para produce_scattertext_explorer (y funciones similares) permiten los gradientes de manipulación.
include_gradient: bool ( False por defecto) es un indicador que desencadena la apariencia de un gradiente.left_gradient_term: Optional[str] indica el texto escrito en el lado izquierdo del gradiente. Está escrito en gradient_text_color y es category_name de forma predeterminada.right_gradient_term: Optional[str] indica el texto escrito en el lado de la izquierda del gradiente. Está escrito en gradient_text_color y es not_category_name de forma predeterminada.middle_gradient_term: Optional[str] indica el texto escrito en el medio del gradiente. Es el color opuesto del color de gradiente central y está vacío de forma predeterminada.gradient_text_color: Optional[str] indica el color fijo del texto escrito en el gradiente. Si ninguno, el valor predeterminado es el color opuesto del gradiente.left_text_color: Optional[str] anula gradient_text_color para el término de gradiente izquierdomiddle_text_color: Optional[str] anula gradient_text_color para el término de gradiente medioright_text_color: Optional[str] anula gradient_text_color para el término de gradiente derechogradient_colors: Optional[List[str]] de colores hexadecimales, incluidos '#', (por ejemplo, ['#0000ff', '#980067', '#cc3300', '#32cd00'] ) que describen el gradiente. Si se da, estos anulan d3_color_scale . Un ejemplo directo es el siguiente. Los colores del término se definen como un mapeo entre un nombre de término y un color #RRGGBB como parte del parámetro term_color , y el gradiente de color se define en gradient_colors . El
import matplotlib . pyplot as plt
import matplotlib as mpl
df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data (). assign (
parse = lambda df : df . text . apply ( st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
)
corpus = st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments (
df , category_col = 'party' , parsed_col = 'parse'
). build (). get_unigram_corpus (). compact ( st . AssociationCompactor ( 2000 ))
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
corpus ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
minimum_term_frequency = 0 ,
pmi_threshold_coefficient = 0 ,
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
metadata = corpus . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ],
transform = st . Scalers . dense_rank ,
include_gradient = True ,
left_gradient_term = "More Democratic" ,
right_gradient_term = "More Republican" ,
middle_gradient_term = 'Metric: Dense Rank Difference' ,
gradient_text_color = "white" ,
term_colors = dict ( zip (
corpus . get_terms (),
[
mpl . colors . to_hex ( x ) for x in plt . get_cmap ( 'brg' )(
st . Scalers . scale_center_zero_abs (
st . RankDifferenceScorer ( corpus ). set_categories ( 'democrat' ). get_scores ()). values
)
]
)),
gradient_colors = [ mpl . colors . to_hex ( x ) for x in plt . get_cmap ( 'brg' )( np . arange ( 1. , 0. , - 0.01 ))],
) Para visualizar temas y categorías Empath (Fast et al., 2016) en lugar de términos, necesitaremos crear un Corpus de temas y categorías extraídos en lugar de unigrams y bigrams. Para hacerlo, use el extractor de funciones FeatsOnlyFromEmpath . Consulte el código fuente para ver ejemplos de cómo hacer el suyo.
Al crear la visualización, pase el argumento use_non_text_features=True en produce_scattertext_explorer . Esto le indicará que use los temas y categorías Empath etiquetados en lugar de buscar términos. Dado que los documentos devueltos cuando se hace clic en un tema o etiqueta de categoría se hará en orden de la fuerza de asociación de categoría a nivel de documento, configurar use_full_doc=True tiene sentido, a menos que tenga enormes documentos. De lo contrario, se mostrarán los primeros 300 caracteres.
(Nuevo en 0.0.26). Asegúrese de incluir topic_model_term_lists=feat_builder.get_top_model_term_lists() en produce_scattertext_explorer para garantizar que se atribuya los pasajes de fragmentos que coinciden con el modelo de tema.
>>> feat_builder = st.FeatsFromOnlyEmpath()
>>> empath_corpus = st.CorpusFromParsedDocuments(convention_df,
... category_col='party',
... feats_from_spacy_doc=feat_builder,
... parsed_col='text').build()
>>> html = st.produce_scattertext_explorer(empath_corpus,
... category='democrat',
... category_name='Democratic',
... not_category_name='Republican',
... width_in_pixels=1000,
... metadata=convention_df['speaker'],
... use_non_text_features=True,
... use_full_doc=True,
... topic_model_term_lists=feat_builder.get_top_model_term_lists())
>>> open("Convention-Visualization-Empath.html", 'wb').write(html.encode('utf-8'))
C ScatterText también incluye un constructor de características para explorar la relación entre el consultor general Categoires y las categorías de documentos. Usaremos un enfoque ligeramente diferente, analizando la relación de las categorías de etiquetas GI para los partidos políticos utilizando las puntuaciones Z de la relación logarítmica con prioras de Dirichlet no informativas (Monroe 2008). Usaremos la variación de gráficos produce_frequency_explorer para visualizar esta relación, estableciendo el eje X como el número de veces que ocurre una palabra en la categoría de etiqueta, y el eje y como el puntaje Z.
Para obtener más información sobre el Investigador general, consulte la página de inicio de General Inquirer.
Usaremos el mismo conjunto de datos que antes, excepto que utilizaremos FeatsFromGeneralInquirer Feature Builder.
>>> general_inquirer_feature_builder = st.FeatsFromGeneralInquirer()
>>> corpus = st.CorpusFromPandas(convention_df,
... category_col='party',
... text_col='text',
... nlp=st.whitespace_nlp_with_sentences,
... feats_from_spacy_doc=general_inquirer_feature_builder).build()
A continuación, llamaremos a produce_frequency_explorer de manera similar que llamamos produce_scattertext_explorer en la sección anterior. Sin embargo, hay algunas diferencias. Primero, especificamos el anotador LogOddsRatioUninformativeDirichletPrior Term, que califica las relaciones entre las categorías. El grey_threshold indica que la puntuación de los puntos entre [-1.96, 1.96] (es decir, p> 0.05) debe ser de color gris. El argumento metadata_descriptions=general_inquirer_feature_builder.get_definitions() indica que se pasa un diccionario que mapea el nombre de la etiqueta a una definición de cadena. Cuando se hace clic en una etiqueta, la definición en el diccionario se mostrará debajo de la gráfica, como se muestra en la imagen que sigue al fragmento.
>>> html = st.produce_frequency_explorer(corpus,
... category='democrat',
... category_name='Democratic',
... not_category_name='Republican',
... metadata=convention_df['speaker'],
... use_non_text_features=True,
... use_full_doc=True,
... term_scorer=st.LogOddsRatioUninformativeDirichletPrior(),
... grey_threshold=1.96,
... width_in_pixels=1000,
... topic_model_term_lists=general_inquirer_feature_builder.get_top_model_term_lists(),
... metadata_descriptions=general_inquirer_feature_builder.get_definitions())
Aquí está el gráfico resultante.
La [Teoría de los fundamentos morales] propone seis construcciones psicológicas como bloques de construcción del pensamiento moral, como se describe en Graham et al. (2013). Estas bases se describen, como se describe en [moralfoundations.org]: cuidado/daño, equidad/trampa, lealtad/traición, autoridad/subversión, santidad/degradación y libertad/opresión. Consulte el sitio para obtener una discusión más profunda de estos fundamentos.
Frimer et al. (2019) crearon el Diccionario de Fundamentos Morales 2.0, o un léxico de términos que invocan una base moral como una virtud (favorable hacia la fundación) o un vicio (en oposición a la fundación).
Este diccionario se puede utilizar de la misma manera que el Inquirador General. En este ejemplo, podemos trazar los puntajes de Cohen D de los recuentos de palabras fundamentales en relación con las frecuencias que se invocaron las palabras que involucran esas bases.
Primero podemos cargar el corpus como de costumbre, y usar st.FeatsFromMoralFoundationsDictionary() para extraer características.
import scattertext as st
convention_df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data ()
moral_foundations_feats = st . FeatsFromMoralFoundationsDictionary ()
corpus = st . CorpusFromPandas ( convention_df ,
category_col = 'party' ,
text_col = 'text' ,
nlp = st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences ,
feats_from_spacy_doc = moral_foundations_feats ). build ()A continuación, usemos el anotador del término D de Cohen para analizar el corpus y describamos un conjunto de puntajes de la asociación D de Cohen.
cohens_d_scorer = st . CohensD ( corpus ). use_metadata ()
term_scorer = cohens_d_scorer . set_categories ( 'democrat' , [ 'republican' ]). term_scorer . get_score_df ()Que produce el siguiente marco de datos:
| cohens_d | cohens_d_se | cohens_d_z | cohens_d_p | hedges_g | hedges_g_se | hedges_g_z | hedges_g_p | M1 | m2 | Conde1 | conte2 | docs1 | docs2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Care.virtue | 0.662891 | 0.149425 | 4.43629 | 4.57621e-06 | 0.660257 | 0.159049 | 4.15129 | 1.65302E-05 | 0.195049 | 0.12164 | 760 | 379 | 115 | 54 |
| Care.vice | 0.24435 | 0.146025 | 1.67335 | 0.0471292 | 0.243379 | 0.152654 | 1.59432 | 0.0554325 | 0.0580005 | 0.0428358 | 244 | 121 | 80 | 41 |
| justicia.virtue | 0.176794 | 0.145767 | 1.21286 | 0.112592 | 0.176092 | 0.152164 | 1.15725 | 0.123586 | 0.0502469 | 0.0403369 | 225 | 107 | 71 | 39 |
| justicia. | 0.0707162 | 0.145528 | 0.485928 | 0.313509 | 0.0704352 | 0.151711 | 0.464273 | 0.321226 | 0.00718627 | 0.00573227 | 32 | 14 | 21 | 10 |
| autoridad. | -0.0187793 | 0.145486 | -0.12908 | 0.551353 | -0.0187047 | 0.15163 | -0.123357 | 0.549088 | 0.358192 | 0.361191 | 1281 | 788 | 122 | 66 |
| autoridad. | -0.0354164 | 0.145494 | -0.243422 | 0.596161 | -0.0352757 | 0.151646 | -0.232619 | 0.591971 | 0.00353465 | 0.00390602 | 20 | 14 | 14 | 10 |
| santidad.virtue | -0.512145 | 0.147848 | -3.46399 | 0.999734 | -0.51011 | 0.156098 | -3.26788 | 0.999458 | 0.0587987 | 0.101677 | 265 | 309 | 74 | 48 |
| santidad.vice | -0.108011 | 0.145589 | -0.74189 | 0.770923 | -0.107582 | 0.151826 | -0.708585 | 0.760709 | 0.00845048 | 0.0109339 | 35 | 28 | 23 | 20 |
| lealtad.virtue | -0.413696 | 0.147031 | -2.81367 | 0.997551 | -0.412052 | 0.154558 | -2.666 | 0.996162 | 0.259296 | 0.309776 | 1056 | 717 | 119 | 66 |
| lealtad.vice | -0.0854683 | 0.145549 | -0.587213 | 0.72147 | -0.0851287 | 0.151751 | -0.560978 | 0.712594 | 0.00124518 | 0.00197022 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
Este marco de datos nos ofrece los puntajes D de Cohen (y sus errores estándar y puntajes Z), Hedge's
Tenga en cuenta que la D de Cohen es la diferencia de M1 y M2 dividida por su desviación estándar agrupada.
Ahora, trazemos los puntajes D de los cimientos frente a sus frecuencias.
html = st . produce_frequency_explorer (
corpus ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
metadata = convention_df [ 'speaker' ],
use_non_text_features = True ,
use_full_doc = True ,
term_scorer = st . CohensD ( corpus ). use_metadata (),
grey_threshold = 0 ,
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
topic_model_term_lists = moral_foundations_feats . get_top_model_term_lists (),
metadata_descriptions = moral_foundations_feats . get_definitions ()
)A menudo, los términos de mayor interés son los que son característicos para el corpus en su conjunto. Estos son términos que ocurren con frecuencia en todos los conjuntos de documentos que se están estudiando, pero relativamente poco frecuentes en comparación con las frecuencias de términos generales.
Podemos producir una gráfica con una puntuación característica en el eje X y las puntuaciones de asociación de clase en el eje Y utilizando la función produce_characteristic_explorer .
La característica del corpus es la diferencia en el término denso rangos entre las palabras en todos los documentos en el estudio y una lista general de frecuencia en inglés. Vea esta charla sobre puntajes de asociación de clase de término para obtener una explicación más exhaustiva.
import scattertext as st
corpus = ( st . CorpusFromPandas ( st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data (),
category_col = 'party' ,
text_col = 'text' ,
nlp = st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
. build ()
. get_unigram_corpus ()
. compact ( st . ClassPercentageCompactor ( term_count = 2 ,
term_ranker = st . OncePerDocFrequencyRanker )))
html = st . produce_characteristic_explorer (
corpus ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
metadata = corpus . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ]
)
open ( 'demo_characteristic_chart.html' , 'wb' ). write ( html . encode ( 'utf-8' )) Además de las palabras, fases y temas, podemos hacer que cada punto corresponda a un documento. Primero creemos un objeto corpus para el conjunto de datos de convenciones de 2012. Esta explicación sigue demo_pca_documents.py
import pandas as pd
from sklearn . feature_extraction . text import TfidfTransformer
import scattertext as st
from scipy . sparse . linalg import svds
convention_df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data ()
convention_df [ 'parse' ] = convention_df [ 'text' ]. apply ( st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
corpus = ( st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments ( convention_df ,
category_col = 'party' ,
parsed_col = 'parse' )
. build ()
. get_stoplisted_unigram_corpus ()) A continuación, agregemos los nombres de documentos como meta datos en el objeto Corpus. La función add_doc_names_as_metadata toma una matriz de nombres de documentos y llena los meta datos de un nuevo corpus con esos nombres. Si dos documentos tienen el mismo nombre, agrega un número (comenzando con 1) al nombre.
corpus = corpus . add_doc_names_as_metadata ( corpus . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ])A continuación, encontramos las puntuaciones TF.IDF para la matriz de documentos de término del corpus, ejecutamos SVD disperso y las agregamos a un marco de datos de proyección, lo que hace que los ejes x e y los dos primeros valores singulares e indexar en los meta datos del corpus, que correspondan a los nombres de los documentos.
embeddings = TfidfTransformer (). fit_transform ( corpus . get_term_doc_mat ())
u , s , vt = svds ( embeddings , k = 3 , maxiter = 20000 , which = 'LM' )
projection = pd . DataFrame ({ 'term' : corpus . get_metadata (), 'x' : u . T [ 0 ], 'y' : u . T [ 1 ]}). set_index ( 'term' ) Finalmente, establece los puntajes como 1 para demócratas y 0 para los republicanos, lo que representa documentos republicanos como puntos rojos y documentos demócratas como azules. Para obtener más información sobre la función produce_pca_explorer , consulte Uso de SVD para visualizar cualquier tipo de incrustaciones de palabras.
category = 'democrat'
scores = ( corpus . get_category_ids () == corpus . get_categories (). index ( category )). astype ( int )
html = st . produce_pca_explorer ( corpus ,
category = category ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
metadata = convention_df [ 'speaker' ],
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
show_axes = False ,
use_non_text_features = True ,
use_full_doc = True ,
projection = projection ,
scores = scores ,
show_top_terms = False )Haga clic para obtener una versión interactiva
Cohen's D es una métrica popular utilizada para medir el tamaño del efecto. Las definiciones de Cohen's D y Hedge's
> >> convention_df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data ()
> >> corpus = ( st . CorpusFromPandas ( convention_df ,
... category_col = 'party' ,
... text_col = 'text' ,
... nlp = st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
.... build ()
.... get_unigram_corpus ())Podemos crear un objeto de anotador de término para examinar los tamaños del efecto y otras métricas.
>> > term_scorer = st . CohensD ( corpus ). set_categories ( 'democrat' , [ 'republican' ])
>> > term_scorer . get_score_df (). sort_values ( by = 'cohens_d' , ascending = False ). head ()
cohens_d
cohens_d_se
cohens_d_z
cohens_d_p
hedges_g
hedges_g_se
hedges_g_z
hedges_g_p
m1
m2
obama
1.187378
0.024588
48.290444
0.000000e+00
1.187322
0.018419
64.461363
0.0
0.007778
0.002795
class 0.855859 0.020848 41.052045 0.000000e+00 0.855818 0.017227 49.677688 0.0 0.002222 0.000375
middle
0.826895
0.020553
40.232746
0.000000e+00
0.826857
0.017138
48.245626
0.0
0.002316
0.000400
president
0.820825
0.020492
40.056541
0.000000e+00
0.820786
0.017120
47.942661
0.0
0.010231
0.005369
barack
0.730624
0.019616
37.245725
6.213052e-304
0.730589
0.016862
43.327800
0.0
0.002547
0.000725 Nuestro cálculo de la D de Cohen no se basa directamente en los recuentos de términos. Más bien, dividimos el término de cada documento con el número total de términos en el documento antes de calcular las estadísticas. m1 y m2 son, respectivamente, las partes medias de las palabras en los discursos realizados por demócratas y republicanos que fueron el término en cuestión. El tamaño del efecto ( cohens_d ) es la diferencia entre estos medios divididos por la desviación estándar agrupada. cohens_d_se es el error estándar de la estadística, mientras que cohens_d_z y cohens_d_p son las puntuaciones Z y los valores P que indican la importancia estadística del efecto. Las columnas correspondientes están presentes para la cobertura
> >> st . produce_frequency_explorer (
corpus ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
term_scorer = st . CohensD ( corpus ),
metadata = convention_df [ 'speaker' ],
grey_threshold = 0
)Haga clic para obtener una versión interactiva.
Cliff's Delta (Cliff 1993) utiliza un enfoque no paramétrico para el tamaño del efecto de computación. En nuestro entorno, el porcentaje de frecuencia del término de cada documento en el conjunto de foco se compara con el del conjunto de antecedentes. Para cada par de documentos, se proporciona una puntuación de 1 si el porcentaje de frecuencia del documento de enfoque es mayor que el fondo, 0 si es idéntico y -1 si es diferente. Tenga en cuenta que esto supone que las longitudes de los documentos se distribuyen de manera similar a través del foco y los corpus de antecedentes.
Consulte [https://real-statistics.com/non-parametric-tests/mann-whitney-test/cliffs-delta/] para las fórmulas utilizadas en CliffsDelta .
A continuación se muestra un ejemplo de cómo usar CliffsDelta para encontrar y trazar puntajes de términos:
nlp = spacy . blank ( 'en' )
nlp . add_pipe ( 'sentencizer' )
convention_df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data (). assign (
party = lambda df : df . party . apply (
lambda x : { 'democrat' : 'Dem' , 'republican' : 'Rep' }[ x ]),
SpacyParse = lambda df : df . text . progress_apply ( nlp )
)
corpus = st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments ( convention_df , category_col = 'party' , parsed_col = 'SpacyParse' ). build (
). remove_terms_used_in_less_than_num_docs ( 10 )
st . CliffsDelta ( corpus ). set_categories ( 'Dem' ). get_score_df (). sort_values ( by = 'Dem' , ascending = False ). iloc [: 10 ]| término | Métrico | Stddev | Bajo-5.0% CI | Alto-5.0% CI | Termcount1 | Termcount2 | Doccount1 | Doccount2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obama | 0.597191 | 0.0266606 | -1.35507 | -1.03477 | 537 | 165 | 113 | 40 |
| Presidente Obama | 0.565903 | 0.0314348 | -2.37978 | -1.74131 | 351 | 78 | 100 | 30 |
| presidente | 0.426337 | 0.0293418 | 1.22784 | 0.909226 | 740 | 301 | 113 | 53 |
| medio | 0.417591 | 0.0267365 | 1.10791 | 0.840932 | 164 | 27 | 68 | 12 |
| clase | 0.415373 | 0.0280622 | 1.09032 | 0.815649 | 161 | 25 | 69 | 14 |
| Barack | 0.406997 | 0.0281692 | 1.00765 | 0.750963 | 202 | 46 | 76 | 16 |
| Barack Obama | 0.402562 | 0.027512 | 0.965359 | 0.723403 | 164 | 45 | 76 | 16 |
| eso es | 0.384085 | 0.0227344 | 0.809747 | 0.634705 | 236 | 91 | 89 | 31 |
| Obama. | 0.356245 | 0.0237453 | 0.664688 | 0.509631 | 70 | 5 | 49 | 4 |
| para | 0.35526 | 0.0364138 | 0.70142 | 0.46487 | 1020 | 542 | 119 | 62 |
Podemos mostrar elegantemente las puntuaciones delta del acantilado utilizando dataframe_scattertext , y describir el esquema de coloración de puntos utilizando el parámetro include_gradient=True . Establecimos los parámetros left_gradient_term , middle_gradient_term y right_gradient_term en cadenas que aparecerán en sus valores de Corresoning.
plot_df = st . CliffsDelta (
corpus
). set_categories (
category_name = 'Dem'
). get_score_df (). rename ( columns = { 'Metric' : 'CliffsDelta' }). assign (
Frequency = lambda df : df . TermCount1 + df . TermCount1 ,
X = lambda df : df . Frequency ,
Y = lambda df : df . CliffsDelta ,
Xpos = lambda df : st . Scalers . dense_rank ( df . X ),
Ypos = lambda df : st . Scalers . scale_center_zero_abs ( df . Y ),
ColorScore = lambda df : df . Ypos ,
)
html = st . dataframe_scattertext (
corpus ,
plot_df = plot_df ,
category = 'Dem' ,
category_name = 'Dem' ,
not_category_name = 'Rep' ,
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
ignore_categories = False ,
metadata = lambda corpus : corpus . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ],
color_score_column = 'ColorScore' ,
left_list_column = 'ColorScore' ,
show_characteristic = False ,
y_label = "Cliff's Delta" ,
x_label = 'Frequency Ranks' ,
y_axis_labels = [ f'More Rep: delta= { plot_df . CliffsDelta . max ():.3f } ' ,
'' ,
f'More Dem: delta= { - plot_df . CliffsDelta . max ():.3f } ' ],
tooltip_columns = [ 'Frequency' , 'CliffsDelta' ],
term_description_columns = [ 'CliffsDelta' , 'Stddev' , 'Low-95.0% CI' , 'High-95.0% CI' ],
header_names = { 'upper' : 'Top Dem' , 'lower' : 'Top Reps' },
horizontal_line_y_position = 0 ,
include_gradient = True ,
left_gradient_term = 'More Republican' ,
right_gradient_term = 'More Democratic' ,
middle_gradient_term = "Metric: Cliff's Delta" ,
) La separación bi-normal (BNS) (Forman, 2008) se agregó en la versión 0.1.8. Se utiliza una variación de (BNS) donde
corpus = ( st . CorpusFromPandas ( convention_df ,
category_col = 'party' ,
text_col = 'text' ,
nlp = st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
. build ()
. get_unigram_corpus ()
. remove_infrequent_words ( 3 , term_ranker = st . OncePerDocFrequencyRanker ))
term_scorer = ( st . BNSScorer ( corpus ). set_categories ( 'democrat' ))
print ( term_scorer . get_score_df (). sort_values ( by = 'democrat BNS' ))
html = st . produce_frequency_explorer (
corpus ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
scores = term_scorer . get_score_df ()[ 'democrat BNS' ]. reindex ( corpus . get_terms ()). values ,
metadata = lambda c : c . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ],
minimum_term_frequency = 0 ,
grey_threshold = 0 ,
y_label = f'Bi-normal Separation (alpha= { term_scorer . prior_counts } )'
)BNS obtuvo términos utilizando un alfa encontrado algorítmicamente. ! [Bns] (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jasonkessler/jasonkessler.github.io/master/d emo_bi_normal_separation.png)
Podemos entrenar un clasificador para producir un puntaje de predicción para cada documento. A menudo, los clasificadores o regresores usan características que tienen en cuenta las características más allá de las representadas por dispersión, ya sean n-gram, tema, extralingüístico, neuronal, etc.
Podemos usar ScatterText para visualizar las correlaciones entre unigramas (o realmente cualquier representación de características) y los puntajes de documentos producidos por un modelo.
En el siguiente ejemplo, entrenamos un SVM lineal utilizando características unigram y bi-gram en todo el conjunto de datos de la convención, y usamos el modelo para hacer una predicción en cada documento, y finalmente utilizando Pearson's
from sklearn . svm import LinearSVC
import scattertext as st
df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data (). assign (
parse = lambda df : df . text . apply ( st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
)
corpus = st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments (
df , category_col = 'party' , parsed_col = 'parse'
). build ()
X = corpus . get_term_doc_mat ()
y = corpus . get_category_ids ()
clf = LinearSVC ()
clf . fit ( X = X , y = y == corpus . get_categories (). index ( 'democrat' ))
doc_scores = clf . decision_function ( X = X )
compactcorpus = corpus . get_unigram_corpus (). compact ( st . AssociationCompactor ( 2000 ))
plot_df = st . Correlations (). set_correlation_type (
'pearsonr'
). get_correlation_df (
corpus = compactcorpus ,
document_scores = doc_scores
). reindex ( compactcorpus . get_terms ()). assign (
X = lambda df : df . Frequency ,
Y = lambda df : df [ 'r' ],
Xpos = lambda df : st . Scalers . dense_rank ( df . X ),
Ypos = lambda df : st . Scalers . scale_center_zero_abs ( df . Y ),
SuppressDisplay = False ,
ColorScore = lambda df : df . Ypos ,
)
html = st . dataframe_scattertext (
compactcorpus ,
plot_df = plot_df ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
metadata = lambda c : c . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ],
unified_context = False ,
ignore_categories = False ,
color_score_column = 'ColorScore' ,
left_list_column = 'ColorScore' ,
y_label = "Pearson r (correlation to SVM document score)" ,
x_label = 'Frequency Ranks' ,
header_names = { 'upper' : 'Top Democratic' ,
'lower' : 'Top Republican' },
) ScatterText se basa en un conjunto de frecuencias de palabras en inglés de dominio general al calcular la característica de unigram
montones. Cuando se usa la ejecución de scatterText en datos no ingleses o en un dominio específico, la calidad de los puntajes se degradará.
Asegúrese de estar en ScatterText 0.1.6 o superior.
Para remediar esto, se puede agregar un conjunto personalizado de puntajes de fondo a un objeto similar al corpus, utilizando la función Corpus.set_background_corpus . La función toma un objeto pd.Series , indexado en términos con valores de conteo numérico.
Por defecto, [! Entendimiento-escala-F-F-score] (puntaje F escalado) se usa para clasificar cuán característicos son los términos.
El siguiente ejemplo ilustra el uso de frecuencias de palabras de fondo polacas.
Primero, producimos una serie de palabras de mapeo de objetos a sus frecuencias utilizando una lista del repositorio https://github.com/oprogramador/most-common-words-by-language.
polish_word_frequencies = pd . read_csv (
'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hermitdave/FrequencyWords/master/content/2016/pl/pl_50k.txt' ,
sep = ' ' ,
names = [ 'Word' , 'Frequency' ]
). set_index ( 'Word' )[ 'Frequency' ]Tenga en cuenta la composición de la serie
>> > polish_word_frequencies
Word
nie
5875385
to
4388099
się
3507076
w
2723767
na
2309765
Name : Frequency , dtype : int64 A continuación, construimos un marco de datos, reviews_df , que consiste en documentos que aparecen (a un orador no polisco) para ser revisiones de hotel positivas y negativas de https://klejbenchmark.com/tasks/ corpus (Kocoń, et al. 2019). Tenga en cuenta que estos datos están bajo una licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. These are labeled as "__label__meta_plus_m" and "__label__meta_minus_m". We will use Scattertext to compare those reviews and determine
nlp = spacy . blank ( 'pl' )
nlp . add_pipe ( 'sentencizer' )
with ZipFile ( io . BytesIO ( urlopen (
'https://klejbenchmark.com/static/data/klej_polemo2.0-in.zip'
). read ())) as zf :
review_df = pd . read_csv ( zf . open ( 'train.tsv' ), sep = ' t ' )[
lambda df : df . target . isin ([ '__label__meta_plus_m' , '__label__meta_minus_m' ])
]. assign (
Parse = lambda df : df . sentence . apply ( nlp )
) Next, we wish to create a ParsedCorpus object from review_df . In preparation, we first assemble a list of Polish stopwords from the stopwords repository. We also create the not_a_word regular expression to filter out terms which do not contain a letter.
polish_stopwords = {
stopword for stopword in
urlopen (
'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bieli/stopwords/master/polish.stopwords.txt'
). read (). decode ( 'utf-8' ). split ( ' n ' )
if stopword . strip ()
}
not_a_word = re . compile ( r'^W+$' ) With these present, we can build a corpus from review_df with the category being the binary "target" column. We reduce the term space to unigrams and then run the filter_out which takes a function to determine if a term should be removed from the corpus. The function identifies terms which are in the Polish stoplist or do not contain a letter. Finally, terms occurring less than 20 times in the corpus are removed.
We set the background frequency Series we created early as the background corpus.
corpus = st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments (
review_df ,
category_col = 'target' ,
parsed_col = 'Parse'
). build (
). get_unigram_corpus (
). filter_out (
lambda term : term in polish_stopwords or not_a_word . match ( term ) is not None
). remove_infrequent_words (
minimum_term_count = 20
). set_background_corpus (
polish_word_frequencies
)Note that a minimum word count of 20 was chosen to ensure that only around 2,000 terms would be displayed
>> > corpus . get_num_terms ()
2023 Running get_term_and_background_counts shows us total term counts in the corpus compare to background frequency counts. We limit this to terms which only occur in the corpus.
>> > corpus . get_term_and_background_counts ()[
...
lambda df : df . corpus > 0
...]. sort_values ( by = 'corpus' , ascending = False )
background
corpus
m
341583838.0
4819.0
hotelu
33108.0
1812.0
hotel
297974790.0
1651.0
doktor
154840.0
1534.0
polecam
0.0
1438.0
.........
szoku
0.0
21.0
badaniem
0.0
21.0
balkonu
0.0
21.0
stopnia
0.0
21.0
wobec
0.0
21.0Interesting, the term "polecam" appears very frequently in the corpus, but does not appear at all in the background corpus, making it highly characteristic. Judging from Google Translate, it appears to mean something related to "recommend".
We are now ready to display the plot.
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
corpus ,
category = '__label__meta_plus_m' ,
category_name = 'Plus-M' ,
not_category_name = 'Minus-M' ,
minimum_term_frequency = 1 ,
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
transform = st . Scalers . dense_rank
) We can change the formula which is used to produce the Characteristic scores using the characteristic_scorer parameter to produce_scattertext_explorer .
It takes a instance of a descendant of the CharacteristicScorer class. See DenseRankCharacteristicness.py for an example of how to make your own.
Example of plotting with a modified characteristic scorer,
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
corpus ,
category = '__label__meta_plus_m' ,
category_name = 'Plus-M' ,
not_category_name = 'Minus-M' ,
minimum_term_frequency = 1 ,
transform = st . Scalers . dense_rank ,
characteristic_scorer = st . DenseRankCharacteristicness (),
term_ranker = st . termranking . AbsoluteFrequencyRanker ,
term_scorer = st . ScaledFScorePresets ( beta = 1 , one_to_neg_one = True )
). encode ( 'utf-8' ))
print ( 'open ' + fn )Note that numbers show up as more characteristic using the Dense Rank Difference. It may be they occur unusually frequently in this corpus, or perhaps the background word frequencies under counted mumbers.
Word productivity is one strategy for plotting word-based charts describing an uncategorized corpus.
Productivity is defined in Schumann (2016) (Jason: check this) as the entropy of ngrams which contain a term. For the entropy computation, the probability of an n-gram wrt the term whose productivity is being calculated is the frequency of the n-gram divided by the term's frequency.
Since productivity highly correlates with frequency, the recommended metric to plot is the dense rank difference between frequency and productivity.
The snippet below plots words in the convention corpus based on their log frequency and their productivity.
The function st.whole_corpus_productivity_scores returns a DataFrame giving each word's productivity. For example, in the convention corpus,
Productivity scores should be calculated on a Corpus -like object which contains a complete set of unigrams and at least bigrams. This corpus should not be compacted before the productivity score calculation.
The terms with lower productivity have more limited usage (eg, "thank" for "thank you", "united" for "united steates") while the terms with higher productivity occurr in a wider varity of contexts ("getting", "actually", "political", etc.).
import spacy
import scattertext as st
corpus_no_cat = st . CorpusWithoutCategoriesFromParsedDocuments (
st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data (). assign (
Parse = lambda df : [ x for x in spacy . load ( 'en_core_web_sm' ). pipe ( df . text )]),
parsed_col = 'Parse'
). build ()
compact_corpus_no_cat = corpus_no_cat . get_stoplisted_unigram_corpus (). remove_infrequent_words ( 9 )
plot_df = st . whole_corpus_productivity_scores ( corpus_no_cat ). assign (
RankDelta = lambda df : st . RankDifference (). get_scores (
a = df . Productivity ,
b = df . Frequency
)
). reindex (
compact_corpus_no_cat . get_terms ()
). dropna (). assign (
X = lambda df : df . Frequency ,
Xpos = lambda df : st . Scalers . log_scale ( df . Frequency ),
Y = lambda df : df . RankDelta ,
Ypos = lambda df : st . Scalers . scale ( df . RankDelta ),
)
html = st . dataframe_scattertext (
compact_corpus_no_cat . whitelist_terms ( plot_df . index ),
plot_df = plot_df ,
metadata = lambda df : df . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ],
ignore_categories = True ,
x_label = 'Rank Frequency' ,
y_label = "Productivity" ,
left_list_column = 'Ypos' ,
color_score_column = 'Ypos' ,
y_axis_labels = [ 'Least Productive' , 'Average Productivity' , 'Most Productive' ],
header_names = { 'upper' : 'Most Productive' , 'lower' : 'Least Productive' , 'right' : 'Characteristic' },
horizontal_line_y_position = 0
)Let's now turn our attention to a novel term scoring metric, Scaled F-Score. We'll examine this on a unigram version of the Rotten Tomatoes corpus (Pang et al. 2002). It contains excerpts of positive and negative movie reviews.
Please see Scaled F Score Explanation for a notebook version of this analysis.
from scipy . stats import hmean
term_freq_df = corpus . get_unigram_corpus (). get_term_freq_df ()[[ 'Positive freq' , 'Negative freq' ]]
term_freq_df = term_freq_df [ term_freq_df . sum ( axis = 1 ) > 0 ]
term_freq_df [ 'pos_precision' ] = ( term_freq_df [ 'Positive freq' ] * 1. /
( term_freq_df [ 'Positive freq' ] + term_freq_df [ 'Negative freq' ]))
term_freq_df [ 'pos_freq_pct' ] = ( term_freq_df [ 'Positive freq' ] * 1.
/ term_freq_df [ 'Positive freq' ]. sum ())
term_freq_df [ 'pos_hmean' ] = ( term_freq_df
. apply ( lambda x : ( hmean ([ x [ 'pos_precision' ], x [ 'pos_freq_pct' ]])
if x [ 'pos_precision' ] > 0 and x [ 'pos_freq_pct' ] > 0
else 0 ), axis = 1 ))
term_freq_df . sort_values ( by = 'pos_hmean' , ascending = False ). iloc [: 10 ]If we plot term frequency on the x-axis and the percentage of a term's occurrences which are in positive documents (ie, its precision) on the y-axis, we can see that low-frequency terms have a much higher variation in the precision. Given these terms have low frequencies, the harmonic means are low. Thus, the only terms which have a high harmonic mean are extremely frequent words which tend to all have near average precisions.
freq = term_freq_df . pos_freq_pct . values
prec = term_freq_df . pos_precision . values
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
corpus . remove_terms ( set ( corpus . get_terms ()) - set ( term_freq_df . index )),
category = 'Positive' ,
not_category_name = 'Negative' ,
not_categories = [ 'Negative' ],
x_label = 'Portion of words used in positive reviews' ,
original_x = freq ,
x_coords = ( freq - freq . min ()) / freq . max (),
x_axis_values = [ int ( freq . min () * 1000 ) / 1000. ,
int ( freq . max () * 1000 ) / 1000. ],
y_label = 'Portion of documents containing word that are positive' ,
original_y = prec ,
y_coords = ( prec - prec . min ()) / prec . max (),
y_axis_values = [ int ( prec . min () * 1000 ) / 1000. ,
int (( prec . max () / 2. ) * 1000 ) / 1000. ,
int ( prec . max () * 1000 ) / 1000. ],
scores = term_freq_df . pos_hmean . values ,
sort_by_dist = False ,
show_characteristic = False
)
file_name = 'not_normed_freq_prec.html'
open ( file_name , 'wb' ). write ( html . encode ( 'utf-8' ))
IFrame ( src = file_name , width = 1300 , height = 700 ) from scipy . stats import norm
def normcdf ( x ):
return norm . cdf ( x , x . mean (), x . std ())
term_freq_df [ 'pos_precision_normcdf' ] = normcdf ( term_freq_df . pos_precision )
term_freq_df [ 'pos_freq_pct_normcdf' ] = normcdf ( term_freq_df . pos_freq_pct . values )
term_freq_df [ 'pos_scaled_f_score' ] = hmean (
[ term_freq_df [ 'pos_precision_normcdf' ], term_freq_df [ 'pos_freq_pct_normcdf' ]])
term_freq_df . sort_values ( by = 'pos_scaled_f_score' , ascending = False ). iloc [: 10 ] freq = term_freq_df . pos_freq_pct_normcdf . values
prec = term_freq_df . pos_precision_normcdf . values
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
corpus . remove_terms ( set ( corpus . get_terms ()) - set ( term_freq_df . index )),
category = 'Positive' ,
not_category_name = 'Negative' ,
not_categories = [ 'Negative' ],
x_label = 'Portion of words used in positive reviews (norm-cdf)' ,
original_x = freq ,
x_coords = ( freq - freq . min ()) / freq . max (),
x_axis_values = [ int ( freq . min () * 1000 ) / 1000. ,
int ( freq . max () * 1000 ) / 1000. ],
y_label = 'documents containing word that are positive (norm-cdf)' ,
original_y = prec ,
y_coords = ( prec - prec . min ()) / prec . max (),
y_axis_values = [ int ( prec . min () * 1000 ) / 1000. ,
int (( prec . max () / 2. ) * 1000 ) / 1000. ,
int ( prec . max () * 1000 ) / 1000. ],
scores = term_freq_df . pos_scaled_f_score . values ,
sort_by_dist = False ,
show_characteristic = False
) term_freq_df [ 'neg_precision_normcdf' ] = normcdf (( term_freq_df [ 'Negative freq' ] * 1. /
( term_freq_df [ 'Negative freq' ] + term_freq_df [ 'Positive freq' ])))
term_freq_df [ 'neg_freq_pct_normcdf' ] = normcdf (( term_freq_df [ 'Negative freq' ] * 1.
/ term_freq_df [ 'Negative freq' ]. sum ()))
term_freq_df [ 'neg_scaled_f_score' ] = hmean (
[ term_freq_df [ 'neg_precision_normcdf' ], term_freq_df [ 'neg_freq_pct_normcdf' ]])
term_freq_df [ 'scaled_f_score' ] = 0
term_freq_df . loc [ term_freq_df [ 'pos_scaled_f_score' ] > term_freq_df [ 'neg_scaled_f_score' ],
'scaled_f_score' ] = term_freq_df [ 'pos_scaled_f_score' ]
term_freq_df . loc [ term_freq_df [ 'pos_scaled_f_score' ] < term_freq_df [ 'neg_scaled_f_score' ],
'scaled_f_score' ] = 1 - term_freq_df [ 'neg_scaled_f_score' ]
term_freq_df [ 'scaled_f_score' ] = 2 * ( term_freq_df [ 'scaled_f_score' ] - 0.5 )
term_freq_df . sort_values ( by = 'scaled_f_score' , ascending = True ). iloc [: 10 ] is_pos = term_freq_df . pos_scaled_f_score > term_freq_df . neg_scaled_f_score
freq = term_freq_df . pos_freq_pct_normcdf * is_pos - term_freq_df . neg_freq_pct_normcdf * ~ is_pos
prec = term_freq_df . pos_precision_normcdf * is_pos - term_freq_df . neg_precision_normcdf * ~ is_pos
def scale ( ar ):
return ( ar - ar . min ()) / ( ar . max () - ar . min ())
def close_gap ( ar ):
ar [ ar > 0 ] -= ar [ ar > 0 ]. min ()
ar [ ar < 0 ] -= ar [ ar < 0 ]. max ()
return ar
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
corpus . remove_terms ( set ( corpus . get_terms ()) - set ( term_freq_df . index )),
category = 'Positive' ,
not_category_name = 'Negative' ,
not_categories = [ 'Negative' ],
x_label = 'Frequency' ,
original_x = freq ,
x_coords = scale ( close_gap ( freq )),
x_axis_labels = [ 'Frequent in Neg' ,
'Not Frequent' ,
'Frequent in Pos' ],
y_label = 'Precision' ,
original_y = prec ,
y_coords = scale ( close_gap ( prec )),
y_axis_labels = [ 'Neg Precise' ,
'Imprecise' ,
'Pos Precise' ],
scores = ( term_freq_df . scaled_f_score . values + 1 ) / 2 ,
sort_by_dist = False ,
show_characteristic = False
) We can use st.ScaledFScorePresets as a term scorer to display terms' Scaled F-Score on the y-axis and term frequencies on the x-axis.
html = st . produce_frequency_explorer (
corpus . remove_terms ( set ( corpus . get_terms ()) - set ( term_freq_df . index )),
category = 'Positive' ,
not_category_name = 'Negative' ,
not_categories = [ 'Negative' ],
term_scorer = st . ScaledFScorePresets ( beta = 1 , one_to_neg_one = True ),
metadata = rdf [ 'movie_name' ],
grey_threshold = 0
)Scaled F-Score is not the only scoring method included in Scattertext. Please click on one of the links below to view a notebook which describes how other class association scores work and can be visualized through Scattertext.
New in 0.0.2.73 is the delta JS-Divergence scorer DeltaJSDivergence scorer (Gallagher et al. 2020), and its corresponding compactor (JSDCompactor.) See demo_deltajsd.py for an example usage.
New in 0.0.2.72
Scattertext was originally set up to visualize corpora objects, which are connected sets of documents and terms to visualize. The "compaction" process allows users to eliminate terms which may not be associated with a category using a variety of feature selection methods. The issue with this is that the terms eliminated during the selection process are not taken into account when scaling term positions.
This issue can be mitigated by using the position-select-plot process, where term positions are pre-determined before the selection process is made.
Let's first use the 2012 conventions corpus, update the category names, and create a unigram corpus.
import scattertext as st
import numpy as np
df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data (). assign (
parse = lambda df : df . text . apply ( st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
). assign ( party = lambda df : df [ 'party' ]. apply ({ 'democrat' : 'Democratic' , 'republican' : 'Republican' }. get ))
corpus = st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments (
df , category_col = 'party' , parsed_col = 'parse'
). build (). get_unigram_corpus ()
category_name = 'Democratic'
not_category_name = 'Republican'Next, let's create a dataframe consisting of the original counts and their log-scale positions.
def get_log_scale_df ( corpus , y_category , x_category ):
term_coord_df = corpus . get_term_freq_df ( '' )
# Log scale term counts (with a smoothing constant) as the initial coordinates
coord_columns = []
for category in [ y_category , x_category ]:
col_name = category + '_coord'
term_coord_df [ col_name ] = np . log ( term_coord_df [ category ] + 1e-6 ) / np . log ( 2 )
coord_columns . append ( col_name )
# Scale these coordinates to between 0 and 1
min_offset = term_coord_df [ coord_columns ]. min ( axis = 0 ). min ()
for coord_column in coord_columns :
term_coord_df [ coord_column ] -= min_offset
max_offset = term_coord_df [ coord_columns ]. max ( axis = 0 ). max ()
for coord_column in coord_columns :
term_coord_df [ coord_column ] /= max_offset
return term_coord_df
# Get term coordinates from original corpus
term_coordinates = get_log_scale_df ( corpus , category_name , not_category_name )
print ( term_coordinates ) Here is a preview of the term_coordinates dataframe. The Democrat and Republican columns contain the term counts, while the _coord columns contain their logged coordinates. Visualizing 7,973 terms is difficult (but possible) for people running Scattertext on most computers.
Democratic Republican Democratic_coord Republican_coord
term
thank 158 205 0.860166 0.872032
you 836 794 0.936078 0.933729
so 337 212 0.894681 0.873562
much 84 76 0.831380 0.826820
very 62 75 0.817543 0.826216
... ... ... ... ...
precinct 0 2 0.000000 0.661076
godspeed 0 1 0.000000 0.629493
beauty 0 1 0.000000 0.629493
bumper 0 1 0.000000 0.629493
sticker 0 1 0.000000 0.629493
[7973 rows x 4 columns]
We can visualize this full data set by running the following code block. We'll create a custom Javascript function to populate the tooltip with the original term counts, and create a Scattertext Explorer where the x and y coordinates and original values are specified from the data frame. Additionally, we can use show_diagonal=True to draw a dashed diagonal line across the plot area.
You can click the chart below to see the interactive version. Note that it will take a while to load.
# The tooltip JS function. Note that d is is the term data object, and ox and oy are the original x- and y-
# axis counts.
get_tooltip_content = ('(function(d) {return d.term + "<br/>' + not_category_name + ' Count: " ' +
'+ d.ox +"<br/>' + category_name + ' Count: " + d.oy})')
html_orig = st.produce_scattertext_explorer(
corpus,
category=category_name,
not_category_name=not_category_name,
minimum_term_frequency=0,
pmi_threshold_coefficient=0,
width_in_pixels=1000,
metadata=corpus.get_df()['speaker'],
show_diagonal=True,
original_y=term_coordinates[category_name],
original_x=term_coordinates[not_category_name],
x_coords=term_coordinates[category_name + '_coord'],
y_coords=term_coordinates[not_category_name + '_coord'],
max_overlapping=3,
use_global_scale=True,
get_tooltip_content=get_tooltip_content,
)
Next, we can visualize the compacted version of the corpus. The compaction, using ClassPercentageCompactor , selects terms which frequently in each category. The term_count parameter, set to 2, is used to determine the percentage threshold for terms to keep in a particular category. This is done using by calculating the percentile of terms (types) in each category which appear more than two times. We find the smallest percentile, and only include terms which occur above that percentile in a given category.
Note that this compaction leaves only 2,828 terms. This number is much easier for Scattertext to display in a browser.
# Select terms which appear a minimum threshold in both corpora
compact_corpus = corpus . compact ( st . ClassPercentageCompactor ( term_count = 2 ))
# Only take term coordinates of terms remaining in corpus
term_coordinates = term_coordinates . loc [ compact_corpus . get_terms ()]
html_compact = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
compact_corpus ,
category = category_name ,
not_category_name = not_category_name ,
minimum_term_frequency = 0 ,
pmi_threshold_coefficient = 0 ,
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
metadata = corpus . get_df ()[ 'speaker' ],
show_diagonal = True ,
original_y = term_coordinates [ category_name ],
original_x = term_coordinates [ not_category_name ],
x_coords = term_coordinates [ category_name + '_coord' ],
y_coords = term_coordinates [ not_category_name + '_coord' ],
max_overlapping = 3 ,
use_global_scale = True ,
get_tooltip_content = get_tooltip_content ,
) Occasionally, only term frequency statistics are available. This may happen in the case of very large, lost, or proprietary data sets. TermCategoryFrequencies is a corpus representation,that can accept this sort of data, along with any categorized documents that happen to be available.
Let use the Corpus of Contemporary American English as an example.
We'll construct a visualization to analyze the difference between spoken American English and English that occurs in fiction.
df = ( pd . read_excel ( 'https://www.wordfrequency.info/files/genres_sample.xls' )
. dropna ()
. set_index ( 'lemma' )[[ 'SPOKEN' , 'FICTION' ]]
. iloc [: 1000 ])
df . head ()
'''
SPOKEN FICTION
lemma
the 3859682.0 4092394.0
I 1346545.0 1382716.0
they 609735.0 352405.0
she 212920.0 798208.0
would 233766.0 229865.0
''' Transforming this into a visualization is extremely easy. Just pass a dataframe indexed on terms with columns indicating category-counts into the the TermCategoryFrequencies constructor.
term_cat_freq = st . TermCategoryFrequencies ( df ) And call produce_scattertext_explorer normally:
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
term_cat_freq ,
category = 'SPOKEN' ,
category_name = 'Spoken' ,
not_category_name = 'Fiction' ,
) If you'd like to incorporate some documents into the visualization, you can add them into to the TermCategoyFrequencies object.
First, let's extract some example Fiction and Spoken documents from the sample COCA corpus.
import requests , zipfile , io
coca_sample_url = 'http://corpus.byu.edu/cocatext/samples/text.zip'
zip_file = zipfile . ZipFile ( io . BytesIO ( requests . get ( coca_sample_url ). content ))
document_df = pd . DataFrame (
[{ 'text' : zip_file . open ( fn ). read (). decode ( 'utf-8' ),
'category' : 'SPOKEN' }
for fn in zip_file . filelist if fn . filename . startswith ( 'w_spok' )][: 2 ]
+ [{ 'text' : zip_file . open ( fn ). read (). decode ( 'utf-8' ),
'category' : 'FICTION' }
for fn in zip_file . filelist if fn . filename . startswith ( 'w_fic' )][: 2 ]) And we'll pass the documents_df dataframe into TermCategoryFrequencies via the document_category_df parameter. Ensure the dataframe has two columns, 'text' and 'category'. Afterward, we can call produce_scattertext_explorer (or your visualization function of choice) normally.
doc_term_cat_freq = st . TermCategoryFrequencies ( df , document_category_df = document_df )
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
doc_term_cat_freq ,
category = 'SPOKEN' ,
category_name = 'Spoken' ,
not_category_name = 'Fiction' ,
)Word representations have recently become a hot topic in NLP. While lots of work has been done visualizing how terms relate to one another given their scores (eg, http://projector.tensorflow.org/), none to my knowledge has been done visualizing how we can use these to examine how document categories differ.
In this example given a query term, "jobs", we can see how Republicans and Democrats talk about it differently.
In this configuration of Scattertext, words are colored by their similarity to a query phrase.
This is done using spaCy-provided GloVe word vectors (trained on the Common Crawl corpus). The cosine distance between vectors is used, with mean vectors used for phrases.
The calculation of the most similar terms associated with each category is a simple heuristic. First, sets of terms closely associated with a category are found. Second, these terms are ranked based on their similarity to the query, and the top rank terms are displayed to the right of the scatterplot.
A term is considered associated if its p-value is less than 0.05. P-values are determined using Monroe et al. (2008)'s difference in the weighted log-odds-ratios with an uninformative Dirichlet prior. This is the only model-based method discussed in Monroe et al. that does not rely on a large, in-domain background corpus. Since we are scoring bigrams in addition to the unigrams scored by Monroe, the size of the corpus would have to be larger to have high enough bigram counts for proper penalization. This function relies the Dirichlet distribution's parameter alpha, a vector, which is uniformly set to 0.01.
Here is the code to produce such a visualization.
>>> from scattertext import word_similarity_explorer
>>> html = word_similarity_explorer(corpus,
... category='democrat',
... category_name='Democratic',
... not_category_name='Republican',
... target_term='jobs',
... minimum_term_frequency=5,
... pmi_threshold_coefficient=4,
... width_in_pixels=1000,
... metadata=convention_df['speaker'],
... alpha=0.01,
... max_p_val=0.05,
... save_svg_button=True)
>>> open("Convention-Visualization-Jobs.html", 'wb').write(html.encode('utf-8'))
Scattertext can interface with Gensim Word2Vec models. For example, here's a snippet from demo_gensim_similarity.py which illustrates how to train and use a word2vec model on a corpus. Note the similarities produced reflect quirks of the corpus, eg, "8" tends to refer to the 8% unemployment rate at the time of the convention.
import spacy
from gensim . models import word2vec
from scattertext import SampleCorpora , word_similarity_explorer_gensim , Word2VecFromParsedCorpus
from scattertext . CorpusFromParsedDocuments import CorpusFromParsedDocuments
nlp = spacy . en . English ()
convention_df = SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data ()
convention_df [ 'parsed' ] = convention_df . text . apply ( nlp )
corpus = CorpusFromParsedDocuments ( convention_df , category_col = 'party' , parsed_col = 'parsed' ). build ()
model = word2vec . Word2Vec ( size = 300 ,
alpha = 0.025 ,
window = 5 ,
min_count = 5 ,
max_vocab_size = None ,
sample = 0 ,
seed = 1 ,
workers = 1 ,
min_alpha = 0.0001 ,
sg = 1 ,
hs = 1 ,
negative = 0 ,
cbow_mean = 0 ,
iter = 1 ,
null_word = 0 ,
trim_rule = None ,
sorted_vocab = 1 )
html = word_similarity_explorer_gensim ( corpus ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
target_term = 'jobs' ,
minimum_term_frequency = 5 ,
pmi_threshold_coefficient = 4 ,
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
metadata = convention_df [ 'speaker' ],
word2vec = Word2VecFromParsedCorpus ( corpus , model ). train (),
max_p_val = 0.05 ,
save_svg_button = True )
open ( './demo_gensim_similarity.html' , 'wb' ). write ( html . encode ( 'utf-8' ))How Democrats and Republicans talked differently about "jobs" in their 2012 convention speeches.
We can use Scattertext to visualize alternative types of word scores, and ensure that 0 scores are greyed out. Use the sparse_explroer function to acomplish this, and see its source code for more details.
>>> from sklearn.linear_model import Lasso
>>> from scattertext import sparse_explorer
>>> html = sparse_explorer(corpus,
... category='democrat',
... category_name='Democratic',
... not_category_name='Republican',
... scores = corpus.get_regression_coefs('democrat', Lasso(max_iter=10000)),
... minimum_term_frequency=5,
... pmi_threshold_coefficient=4,
... width_in_pixels=1000,
... metadata=convention_df['speaker'])
>>> open('./Convention-Visualization-Sparse.html', 'wb').write(html.encode('utf-8'))
You can also use custom term positions and axis labels. For example, you can base terms' y-axis positions on a regression coefficient and their x-axis on term frequency and label the axes accordingly. The one catch is that axis positions must be scaled between 0 and 1.
First, let's define two scaling functions: scale to project positive values to [0,1], and zero_centered_scale project real values to [0,1], with negative values always <0.5, and positive values always >0.5.
>>> def scale(ar):
... return (ar - ar.min()) / (ar.max() - ar.min())
...
>>> def zero_centered_scale(ar):
... ar[ar > 0] = scale(ar[ar > 0])
... ar[ar < 0] = -scale(-ar[ar < 0])
... return (ar + 1) / 2.
Next, let's compute and scale term frequencies and L2-penalized regression coefficients. We'll hang on to the original coefficients and allow users to view them by mousing over terms.
>>> from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
>>> import numpy as np
>>>
>>> frequencies_scaled = scale(np.log(term_freq_df.sum(axis=1).values))
>>> scores = corpus.get_logreg_coefs('democrat',
... LogisticRegression(penalty='l2', C=10, max_iter=10000, n_jobs=-1))
>>> scores_scaled = zero_centered_scale(scores)
Finally, we can write the visualization. Note the use of the x_coords and y_coords parameters to store the respective coordinates, the scores and sort_by_dist arguments to register the original coefficients and use them to rank the terms in the right-hand list, and the x_label and y_label arguments to label axes.
>>> html = produce_scattertext_explorer(corpus,
... category='democrat',
... category_name='Democratic',
... not_category_name='Republican',
... minimum_term_frequency=5,
... pmi_threshold_coefficient=4,
... width_in_pixels=1000,
... x_coords=frequencies_scaled,
... y_coords=scores_scaled,
... scores=scores,
... sort_by_dist=False,
... metadata=convention_df['speaker'],
... x_label='Log frequency',
... y_label='L2-penalized logistic regression coef')
>>> open('demo_custom_coordinates.html', 'wb').write(html.encode('utf-8'))
The Emoji analysis capability displays a chart of the category-specific distribution of Emoji. Let's look at a new corpus, a set of tweets. We'll build a visualization showing how men and women use emoji differently.
Note: the following example is implemented in demo_emoji.py .
First, we'll load the dataset and parse it using NLTK's tweet tokenizer. Note, install NLTK before running this example. It will take some time for the dataset to download.
import nltk , urllib . request , io , agefromname , zipfile
import scattertext as st
import pandas as pd
with zipfile . ZipFile ( io . BytesIO ( urllib . request . urlopen (
'http://followthehashtag.com/content/uploads/USA-Geolocated-tweets-free-dataset-Followthehashtag.zip'
). read ())) as zf :
df = pd . read_excel ( zf . open ( 'dashboard_x_usa_x_filter_nativeretweets.xlsx' ))
nlp = st . tweet_tokenzier_factory ( nltk . tokenize . TweetTokenizer ())
df [ 'parse' ] = df [ 'Tweet content' ]. apply ( nlp )
df . iloc [ 0 ]
'''
Tweet Id 721318437075685382
Date 2016-04-16
Hour 12:44
User Name Bill Schulhoff
Nickname BillSchulhoff
Bio Husband,Dad,GrandDad,Ordained Minister, Umpire...
Tweet content Wind 3.2 mph NNE. Barometer 30.20 in, Rising s...
Favs NaN
RTs NaN
Latitude 40.7603
Longitude -72.9547
Country US
Place (as appears on Bio) East Patchogue, NY
Profile picture http://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/3788000007...
Followers 386
Following 705
Listed 24
Tweet language (ISO 639-1) en
Tweet Url http://www.twitter.com/BillSchulhoff/status/72...
parse Wind 3.2 mph NNE. Barometer 30.20 in, Rising s...
Name: 0, dtype: object
''' Next, we'll use the AgeFromName package to find the probabilities of the gender of each user given their first name. First, we'll find a dataframe indexed on first names that contains the probability that each someone with that first name is male ( male_prob ).
male_prob = agefromname . AgeFromName (). get_all_name_male_prob ()
male_prob . iloc [ 0 ]
'''
hi 1.00000
lo 0.95741
prob 1.00000
Name: aaban, dtype: float64
''' Next, we'll extract the first names of each user, and use the male_prob data frame to find users whose names indicate there is at least a 90% chance they are either male or female, label those users, and create new data frame df_mf with only those users.
df [ 'first_name' ] = df [ 'User Name' ]. apply ( lambda x : x . split ()[ 0 ]. lower () if type ( x ) == str and len ( x . split ()) > 0 else x )
df_aug = pd . merge ( df , male_prob , left_on = 'first_name' , right_index = True )
df_aug [ 'gender' ] = df_aug [ 'prob' ]. apply ( lambda x : 'm' if x > 0.9 else 'f' if x < 0.1 else '?' )
df_mf = df_aug [ df_aug [ 'gender' ]. isin ([ 'm' , 'f' ])] The key to this analysis is to construct a corpus using only the emoji extractor st.FeatsFromSpacyDocOnlyEmoji which builds a corpus only from emoji and not from anything else.
corpus = st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments (
df_mf ,
parsed_col = 'parse' ,
category_col = 'gender' ,
feats_from_spacy_doc = st . FeatsFromSpacyDocOnlyEmoji ()
). build () Next, we'll run this through a standard produce_scattertext_explorer visualization generation.
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
corpus ,
category = 'f' ,
category_name = 'Female' ,
not_category_name = 'Male' ,
use_full_doc = True ,
term_ranker = st . OncePerDocFrequencyRanker ,
sort_by_dist = False ,
metadata = ( df_mf [ 'User Name' ]
+ ' (@' + df_mf [ 'Nickname' ] + ') '
+ df_mf [ 'Date' ]. astype ( str )),
width_in_pixels = 1000
)
open ( "EmojiGender.html" , 'wb' ). write ( html . encode ( 'utf-8' ))SentencePiece tokenization is a subword tokenization technique which relies on a language-model to produce optimized tokenization. It has been used in large, transformer-based contextual language models.
Ensure to run $ pip install sentencepiece before running this example.
First, let's load the political convention data set as normal.
import tempfile
import re
import scattertext as st
convention_df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data ()
convention_df [ 'parse' ] = convention_df . text . apply ( st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences ) Next, let's train a SentencePiece tokenizer based on this data. The train_sentence_piece_tokenizer function trains a SentencePieceProcessor on the data set and returns it. You can of course use any SentencePieceProcessor.
def train_sentence_piece_tokenizer ( documents , vocab_size ):
'''
:param documents: list-like, a list of str documents
:vocab_size int: the size of the vocabulary to output
:return sentencepiece.SentencePieceProcessor
'''
import sentencepiece as spm
sp = None
with tempfile . NamedTemporaryFile ( delete = True ) as tempf :
with tempfile . NamedTemporaryFile ( delete = True ) as tempm :
tempf . write (( ' n ' . join ( documents )). encode ())
spm . SentencePieceTrainer . Train (
'--input=%s --model_prefix=%s --vocab_size=%s' % ( tempf . name , tempm . name , vocab_size )
)
sp = spm . SentencePieceProcessor ()
sp . load ( tempm . name + '.model' )
return sp
sp = train_sentence_piece_tokenizer ( convention_df . text . values , vocab_size = 2000 ) Next, let's add the SentencePiece tokens as metadata when creating our corpus. In order to do this, pass a FeatsFromSentencePiece instance into the feats_from_spacy_doc parameter. Pass the SentencePieceProcessor into the constructor.
corpus = st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments ( convention_df ,
parsed_col = 'parse' ,
category_col = 'party' ,
feats_from_spacy_doc = st . FeatsFromSentencePiece ( sp )). build ()Now we can create the SentencePiece token scatter plot.
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
corpus ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
sort_by_dist = False ,
metadata = convention_df [ 'party' ] + ': ' + convention_df [ 'speaker' ],
term_scorer = st . RankDifference (),
transform = st . Scalers . dense_rank ,
use_non_text_features = True ,
use_full_doc = True ,
)Suppose you'd like to audit or better understand weights or importances given to bag-of-words features by a classifier.
It's easy to use Scattertext to do, if you use a Scikit-learn-style classifier.
For example the Lighting package makes available high-performance linear classifiers which are have Scikit-compatible interfaces.
First, let's import sklearn 's text feature extraction classes, the 20 Newsgroup corpus, Lightning's Primal Coordinate Descent classifier, and Scattertext. We'll also fetch the training portion of the Newsgroup corpus.
from lightning . classification import CDClassifier
from sklearn . datasets import fetch_20newsgroups
from sklearn . feature_extraction . text import CountVectorizer , TfidfVectorizer
import scattertext as st
newsgroups_train = fetch_20newsgroups (
subset = 'train' ,
remove = ( 'headers' , 'footers' , 'quotes' )
)Next, we'll tokenize our corpus twice. Once into tfidf features which will be used to train the classifier, an another time into ngram counts that will be used by Scattertext. It's important that both vectorizers share the same vocabulary, since we'll need to apply the weight vector from the model onto our Scattertext Corpus.
vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer ()
tfidf_X = vectorizer . fit_transform ( newsgroups_train . data )
count_vectorizer = CountVectorizer ( vocabulary = vectorizer . vocabulary_ ) Next, we use the CorpusFromScikit factory to build a Scattertext Corpus object. Ensure the X parameter is a document-by-feature matrix. The argument to the y parameter is an array of class labels. Each label is an integer representing a different news group. We the feature_vocabulary is the vocabulary used by the vectorizers. The category_names are a list of the 20 newsgroup names which as a class-label list. The raw_texts is a list of the text of newsgroup texts.
corpus = st . CorpusFromScikit (
X = count_vectorizer . fit_transform ( newsgroups_train . data ),
y = newsgroups_train . target ,
feature_vocabulary = vectorizer . vocabulary_ ,
category_names = newsgroups_train . target_names ,
raw_texts = newsgroups_train . data
). build () Now, we can train the model on tfidf_X and the categoricla response variable, and capture feature weights for category 0 ("alt.atheism").
clf = CDClassifier ( penalty = "l1/l2" ,
loss = "squared_hinge" ,
multiclass = True ,
max_iter = 20 ,
alpha = 1e-4 ,
C = 1.0 / tfidf_X . shape [ 0 ],
tol = 1e-3 )
clf . fit ( tfidf_X , newsgroups_train . target )
term_scores = clf . coef_ [ 0 ]Finally, we can create a Scattertext plot. We'll use the Monroe-style visualization, and automatically select around 4000 terms that encompass the set of frequent terms, terms with high absolute scores, and terms that are characteristic of the corpus.
html = st . produce_frequency_explorer (
corpus ,
'alt.atheism' ,
scores = term_scores ,
use_term_significance = False ,
terms_to_include = st . AutoTermSelector . get_selected_terms ( corpus , term_scores , 4000 ),
metadata = [ '/' . join ( fn . split ( '/' )[ - 2 :]) for fn in newsgroups_train . filenames ]
)Let's take a look at the performance of the classifier:
newsgroups_test = fetch_20newsgroups ( subset = 'test' ,
remove = ( 'headers' , 'footers' , 'quotes' ))
X_test = vectorizer . transform ( newsgroups_test . data )
pred = clf . predict ( X_test )
f1 = f1_score ( pred , newsgroups_test . target , average = 'micro' )
print ( "Microaveraged F1 score" , f1 )Microaveraged F1 score 0.662108337759. Not bad over a ~0.05 baseline.
Please see Signo for an introduction to semiotic squares.
Some variants of the semiotic square-creator are can be seen in this notebook, which studies words and phrases in headlines that had low or high Facebook engagement and were published by either BuzzFeed or the New York Times: [http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/JasonKessler/PuPPyTalk/blob/master/notebooks/Explore-Headlines.ipynb]
The idea behind the semiotic square is to express the relationship between two opposing concepts and concepts things within a larger domain of a discourse. Examples of opposed concepts life or death, male or female, or, in our example, positive or negative sentiment. Semiotics squares are comprised of four "corners": the upper two corners are the opposing concepts, while the bottom corners are the negation of the concepts.
Circumscribing the negation of a concept involves finding everything in the domain of discourse that isn't associated with the concept. For example, in the life-death opposition, one can consider the universe of discourse to be all animate beings, real and hypothetical. The not-alive category will cover dead things, but also hypothetical entities like fictional characters or sentient AIs.
In building lexicalized semiotic squares, we consider concepts to be documents labeled in a corpus. Documents, in this setting, can belong to one of three categories: two labels corresponding to the opposing concepts, a neutral category, indicating a document is in the same domain as the opposition, but cannot fall into one of opposing categories.
In the example below positive and negative movie reviews are treated as the opposing categories, while plot descriptions of the same movies are treated as the neutral category.
Terms associated with one of the two opposing categories (relative only to the other) are listed as being associated with that category. Terms associated with a netural category (eg, not positive) are terms which are associated with the disjunction of the opposite category and the neutral category. For example, not-positive terms are those most associated with the set of negative reviews and plot descriptions vs. positive reviews.
Common terms among adjacent corners of the square are also listed.
An HTML-rendered square is accompanied by a scatter plot. Points on the plot are terms. The x-axis is the Z-score of the association to one of the opposed concepts. The y-axis is the Z-score how associated a term is with the neutral set of documents relative to the opposed set. A point's red-blue color indicate the term's opposed-association, while the more desaturated a term is, the more it is associated with the neutral set of documents.
Update to version 2.2: terms are colored by their nearest semiotic categories across the eight corresponding radial sectors.
import scattertext as st
movie_df = st . SampleCorpora . RottenTomatoes . get_data ()
movie_df . category = movie_df . category . apply
( lambda x : { 'rotten' : 'Negative' , 'fresh' : 'Positive' , 'plot' : 'Plot' }[ x ])
corpus = st . CorpusFromPandas (
movie_df ,
category_col = 'category' ,
text_col = 'text' ,
nlp = st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences
). build (). get_unigram_corpus ()
semiotic_square = st . SemioticSquare (
corpus ,
category_a = 'Positive' ,
category_b = 'Negative' ,
neutral_categories = [ 'Plot' ],
scorer = st . RankDifference (),
labels = { 'not_a_and_not_b' : 'Plot Descriptions' , 'a_and_b' : 'Reviews' }
)
html = st . produce_semiotic_square_explorer ( semiotic_square ,
category_name = 'Positive' ,
not_category_name = 'Negative' ,
x_label = 'Fresh-Rotten' ,
y_label = 'Plot-Review' ,
neutral_category_name = 'Plot Description' ,
metadata = movie_df [ 'movie_name' ])There are a number of other types of semiotic square construction functions. Again, please see https://nbviewer.org/github/JasonKessler/PuPPyTalk/blob/master/notebooks/Explore-Headlines.ipynb for an overview of these.
A frequently requested feature of Scattertext has been the ability to visualize topic models. While this capability has existed in some forms (eg, the Empath visualization), I've finally gotten around to implementing a concise API for such a visualization. There are three main ways to visualize topic models using Scattertext. The first is the simplest: manually entering topic models and visualizing them. The second uses a Scikit-Learn pipeline to produce the topic models for visualization. The third is a novel topic modeling technique, based on finding terms similar to a custom set of seed terms.
If you have already created a topic model, simply structure it as a dictionary. This dictionary is keyed on string which serve as topic titles and are displayed in the main scatterplot. The values are lists of words that belong to that topic. The words that are in each topic list are bolded when they appear in a snippet.
Note that currently, there is no support for keyword scores.
For example, one might manually the following topic models to explore in the Convention corpus:
topic_model = {
'money' : [ 'money' , 'bank' , 'banks' , 'finances' , 'financial' , 'loan' , 'dollars' , 'income' ],
'jobs' : [ 'jobs' , 'workers' , 'labor' , 'employment' , 'worker' , 'employee' , 'job' ],
'patriotic' : [ 'america' , 'country' , 'flag' , 'americans' , 'patriotism' , 'patriotic' ],
'family' : [ 'mother' , 'father' , 'mom' , 'dad' , 'sister' , 'brother' , 'grandfather' , 'grandmother' , 'son' , 'daughter' ]
} We can use the FeatsFromTopicModel class to transform this topic model into one which can be visualized using Scattertext. This is used just like any other feature builder, and we pass the topic model object into produce_scattertext_explorer .
import scattertext as st
topic_feature_builder = st.FeatsFromTopicModel(topic_model)
topic_corpus = st.CorpusFromParsedDocuments(
convention_df,
category_col='party',
parsed_col='parse',
feats_from_spacy_doc=topic_feature_builder
).build()
html = st.produce_scattertext_explorer(
topic_corpus,
category='democrat',
category_name='Democratic',
not_category_name='Republican',
width_in_pixels=1000,
metadata=convention_df['speaker'],
use_non_text_features=True,
use_full_doc=True,
pmi_threshold_coefficient=0,
topic_model_term_lists=topic_feature_builder.get_top_model_term_lists()
)
Since topic modeling using document-level coocurence generally produces poor results, I've added a SentencesForTopicModeling class which allows clusterting by coocurence at the sentence-level. It requires a ParsedCorpus object to be passed to its constructor, and creates a term-sentence matrix internally.
Next, you can create a topic model dictionary like the one above by passing in a Scikit-Learn clustering or dimensionality reduction pipeline. The only constraint is the last transformer in the pipeline must populate a components_ attribute.
The num_topics_per_term attribute specifies how many terms should be added to a list.
In the following example, we'll use NMF to cluster a stoplisted, unigram corpus of documents, and use the topic model dictionary to create a FeatsFromTopicModel , just like before.
Note that in produce_scattertext_explorer , we make the topic_model_preview_size 20 in order to show a preview of the first 20 terms in the topic in the snippet view as opposed to the default 10.
from sklearn . decomposition import NMF
from sklearn . feature_extraction . text import TfidfTransformer
from sklearn . pipeline import Pipeline
convention_df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data ()
convention_df [ 'parse' ] = convention_df [ 'text' ]. apply ( st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
unigram_corpus = ( st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments ( convention_df ,
category_col = 'party' ,
parsed_col = 'parse' )
. build (). get_stoplisted_unigram_corpus ())
topic_model = st . SentencesForTopicModeling ( unigram_corpus ). get_topics_from_model (
Pipeline ([
( 'tfidf' , TfidfTransformer ( sublinear_tf = True )),
( 'nmf' , ( NMF ( n_components = 100 , alpha = .1 , l1_ratio = .5 , random_state = 0 )))
]),
num_terms_per_topic = 20
)
topic_feature_builder = st . FeatsFromTopicModel ( topic_model )
topic_corpus = st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments (
convention_df ,
category_col = 'party' ,
parsed_col = 'parse' ,
feats_from_spacy_doc = topic_feature_builder
). build ()
html = st . produce_scattertext_explorer (
topic_corpus ,
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
width_in_pixels = 1000 ,
metadata = convention_df [ 'speaker' ],
use_non_text_features = True ,
use_full_doc = True ,
pmi_threshold_coefficient = 0 ,
topic_model_term_lists = topic_feature_builder . get_top_model_term_lists (),
topic_model_preview_size = 20
)A surprisingly easy way to generate good topic models is to use a term scoring formula to find words that are associated with sentences where a seed word occurs vs. where one doesn't occur.
Given a custom term list, the SentencesForTopicModeling.get_topics_from_terms will generate a series of topics. Note that the dense rank difference ( RankDifference ) works particularly well for this task, and is the default parameter.
term_list = [ 'obama' , 'romney' , 'democrats' , 'republicans' , 'health' , 'military' , 'taxes' ,
'education' , 'olympics' , 'auto' , 'iraq' , 'iran' , 'israel' ]
unigram_corpus = ( st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments ( convention_df ,
category_col = 'party' ,
parsed_col = 'parse' )
. build (). get_stoplisted_unigram_corpus ())
topic_model = ( st . SentencesForTopicModeling ( unigram_corpus )
. get_topics_from_terms ( term_list ,
scorer = st . RankDifference (),
num_terms_per_topic = 20 ))
topic_feature_builder = st . FeatsFromTopicModel ( topic_model )
# The remaining code is identical to two examples above. See demo_word_list_topic_model.py
# for the complete example. Scattertext makes it easy to create word-similarity plots using projections of word embeddings as the x and y-axes. In the example below, we create a stop-listed Corpus with only unigram terms. The produce_projection_explorer function by uses Gensim to create word embeddings and then projects them to two dimentions using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP).
UMAP is chosen over T-SNE because it can employ the cosine similarity between two word vectors instead of just the euclidean distance.
convention_df = st . SampleCorpora . ConventionData2012 . get_data ()
convention_df [ 'parse' ] = convention_df [ 'text' ]. apply ( st . whitespace_nlp_with_sentences )
corpus = ( st . CorpusFromParsedDocuments ( convention_df , category_col = 'party' , parsed_col = 'parse' )
. build (). get_stoplisted_unigram_corpus ())
html = st . produce_projection_explorer ( corpus , category = 'democrat' , category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' , metadata = convention_df . speaker ) In order to use custom word embedding functions or projection functions, pass models into the word2vec_model and projection_model parameters. In order to use T-SNE, for example, use projection_model=sklearn.manifold.TSNE() .
import umap
from gensim . models . word2vec import Word2Vec
html = st . produce_projection_explorer ( corpus ,
word2vec_model = Word2Vec ( size = 100 , window = 5 , min_count = 10 , workers = 4 ),
projection_model = umap . UMAP ( min_dist = 0.5 , metric = 'cosine' ),
category = 'democrat' ,
category_name = 'Democratic' ,
not_category_name = 'Republican' ,
metadata = convention_df . speaker ) Term positions can also be determined by the positions of terms according to the output of principal component analysis, and produce_projection_explorer also supports this functionality. We'll look at how axes transformations ("scalers" in Scattertext terminology) can make it easier to inspect the output of PCA.
We'll use the 2012 Conventions corpus for these visualizations. Only unigrams occurring in at least three documents will be considered.
>>> convention_df = st.SampleCorpora.ConventionData2012.get_data()
>>> convention_df['parse'] = convention_df['text'].apply(st.whitespace_nlp_with_sentences)
>>> corpus = (st.CorpusFromParsedDocuments(convention_df,
... category_col='party',
... parsed_col='parse')
... .build()
... .get_stoplisted_unigram_corpus()
... .remove_infrequent_words(minimum_term_count=3, term_ranker=st.OncePerDocFrequencyRanker))
Next, we use scikit-learn's tf-idf transformer to find very simple, sparse embeddings for all of these words. Since, we input a #docs x #terms matrix to the transformer, we can transpose it to get a proper term-embeddings matrix, where each row corresponds to a term, and the columns correspond to document-specific tf-idf scores.
>>> from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfTransformer
>>> embeddings = TfidfTransformer().fit_transform(corpus.get_term_doc_mat())
>>> embeddings.shape
(189, 2159)
>>> corpus.get_num_docs(), corpus.get_num_terms()
(189, 2159)
>>> embeddings = embeddings.T
>>> embeddings.shape
(2159, 189)
Given these spare embeddings, we can apply sparse singular value decomposition to extract three factors. SVD outputs factorizes the term embeddings matrix into three matrices, U, Σ, and VT. Importantly, the matrix U provides the singular values for each term, and VT provides them for each document, and Σ is a vector of the singular values.
>>> from scipy.sparse.linalg import svds
>>> U, S, VT = svds(embeddings, k = 3, maxiter=20000, which='LM')
>>> U.shape
(2159, 3)
>>> S.shape
(3,)
>>> VT.shape
(3, 189)
We'll look at the first two singular values, plotting each term such that the x-axis position is the first singular value, and the y-axis term is the second. To do this, we make a "projection" data frame, where the x and y columns store the first two singular values, and key the data frame on each term. This controls the term positions on the chart.
>>> x_dim = 0; y_dim = 1;
>>> projection = pd.DataFrame({'term':corpus.get_terms(),
... 'x':U.T[x_dim],
... 'y':U.T[y_dim]}).set_index('term')
We'll use the produce_pca_explorer function to visualize these. Note we include the projection object, and specify which singular values were used for x and y ( x_dim and y_dim ) so we they can be labeled in the interactive visualization.
html = st.produce_pca_explorer(corpus,
category='democrat',
category_name='Democratic',
not_category_name='Republican',
projection=projection,
metadata=convention_df['speaker'],
width_in_pixels=1000,
x_dim=x_dim,
y_dim=y_dim)
Click for an interactive visualization.
We can easily re-scale the plot in order to make more efficient use of space. For example, passing in scaler=scale_neg_1_to_1_with_zero_mean will make all four quadrants take equal area.
html = st.produce_pca_explorer(corpus,
category='democrat',
category_name='Democratic',
not_category_name='Republican',
projection=projection,
metadata=convention_df['speaker'],
width_in_pixels=1000,
scaler=st.scale_neg_1_to_1_with_zero_mean,
x_dim=x_dim,
y_dim=y_dim)
Click for an interactive visualization.
To export the content of a scattertext explorer object (ScattertextStructure) to matplotlib you can use produce_scattertext_pyplot . The function returns a matplotlib.figure.Figure object which can be visualized using plt.show or plt.savefig as in the example below.
Note that installation of textalloc==0.0.3 and matplotlib>=3.6.0 is required before running this.
convention_df = st.SampleCorpora.ConventionData2012.get_data().assign(
parse = lambda df: df.text.apply(st.whitespace_nlp_with_sentences)
)
corpus = st.CorpusFromParsedDocuments(convention_df, category_col='party', parsed_col='parse').build()
scattertext_structure = st.produce_scattertext_explorer(
corpus,
category='democrat',
category_name='Democratic',
not_category_name='Republican',
minimum_term_frequency=5,
pmi_threshold_coefficient=8,
width_in_pixels=1000,
return_scatterplot_structure=True,
)
fig = st.produce_scattertext_pyplot(scattertext_structure)
fig.savefig('pyplot_export.png', format='png')
[]
Please see the examples in the PyData 2017 Tutorial on Scattertext.
Cozy: The Collection Synthesizer (Loncaric 2016) was used to help determine which terms could be labeled without overlapping a circle or another label. It automatically built a data structure to efficiently store and query the locations of each circle and labeled term.
The script to build rectangle-holder.js was
fields ax1 : long, ay1 : long, ax2 : long, ay2 : long
assume ax1 < ax2 and ay1 < ay2
query findMatchingRectangles(bx1 : long, by1 : long, bx2 : long, by2 : long)
assume bx1 < bx2 and by1 < by2
ax1 < bx2 and ax2 > bx1 and ay1 < by2 and ay2 > by1
And it was called using
$ python2.7 src/main.py <script file name> --enable-volume-trees
--js-class RectangleHolder --enable-hamt --enable-arrays --js rectangle_holder.js
Adding in code to ensure that term statistics will show up even if no documents are present in visualization.
Better axis labeling (see demo_axis_crossbars_and_labels.py).
Pytextrank compatibility
Ensuring Pandas 1.0 compatibility fixing Issue #51 and scikit-learn stopwords import issue in #49.
AssociationCompactorByRank , TermCategoryRanker . terms_to_show parameter use_categories_as_metadata_and_replace_terms to TermDocMatrix .get_metadata_doc_count_df and get_metadata_count_mat to TermDocMatrix produce_pairplot ScatterChart.hide_terms(terms: iter[str]) which enables selected terms to be hidden from the chart.ScatterChartData.score_transform to specify the function which can change an original score into a value between 0 and 1 used for term coloring. alternative_term_func to produce_scattertext_explorer which allows you to inject a function that activates when a term is clicked.HedgesG , and unbiased version of Cohen's d which is a subclass of CohensD .frequency_transform parameter to produce_frequency_explorer . This defaults to a log transform, but allows you to use any way your heart desires to order terms along the x-axis. show_category_headings=True to produce_scattertext_explorer . Setting this to False suppresses the list of categories which will be displayed in the term context area.div_name argument to produce_scattertext_explorer and name-spaced important divs and classes by div_name in HTML templates and Javascript.show_cross_axes=True to produce_scattertext_explorer . Setting this to False prevents the cross axes from being displayed if show_axes is True .TermDocMatrix.get_metadata_freq_df now accepts the label_append argument which by default adds ' freq' to the end of each column.TermDocMatrix.get_num_cateogires returns the number of categories in a term-document matrix. Added the following methods:
TermDocMatrixWithoutCategories.get_num_metadataTermDocMatrix.use_metadata_as_categoriesunified_context argument in produce_scattertext_explorer lists all contexts in a single column. This let's you see snippets organized by multiple categories in a single column. See demo_unified_context.py for an example. Added a series of objects to handle uncategorized corpora. Added section on Document-Based Scatterplots, and the add_doc_names_as_metadata function. CategoryColorAssigner was also added to assign colors to a qualitative categories.
A number of new term scoring approaches including RelativeEntropy (a direct implementation of Frankhauser et al. ( 2014)), and ZScores and implementation of the Z-Score model used in Frankhauser et al.
TermDocMatrix.get_metadata_freq_df() returns a metadata-doc corpus.
CorpusBasedTermScorer.set_ranker allows you to use a different term ranker when finding corpus-based scores. This not only lets these scorers with metadata, but also allows you to integrate once-per-document counts.
Fixed produce_projection_explorer such that it can work with a predefined set of term embeddings. This can allow, for example, the easy exploration of one hot-encoded term embeddings in addition to arbitrary lower-dimensional embeddings.
Added add_metadata to TermDocMatrix in order to inject meta data after a TermDocMatrix object has been created.
Made sure tooltip never started above the top of the web page.
Added DomainCompactor .
Fixed bug #31, enabling context to show when metadata value is clicked.
Enabled display of terms in topic models in explorer, along with the the display of customized topic models. Please see Visualizing topic models for an overview of the additions.
Removed pkg_resources from Phrasemachine, corrected demo_phrase_machine.py
Now compatible with Gensim 3.4.0.
Added characteristic explorer, produce_characteristic_explorer , to plot terms with their characteristic scores on the x-axis and their class-association scores on the y-axis. See Ordering Terms by Corpus Characteristicness for more details.
Added TermCategoryFrequencies in response to Issue 23. Please see Visualizing differences based on only term frequencies for more details.
Added x_axis_labels and y_axis_labels parameters to produce_scattertext_explorer . These let you include evenly-spaced string axis labels on the chart, as opposed to just "Low", "Medium" and "High". These rely on d3's ticks function, which can behave unpredictable. Caveat usor.
Semiotic Squares now look better, and have customizable labels.
Incorporated the General Inquirer lexicon. For non-commercial use only. The lexicon is downloaded from their homepage at the start of each use. See demo_general_inquierer.py .
Incorporated Phrasemachine from AbeHandler (Handler et al. 2016). For the license, please see PhraseMachineLicense.txt . For an example, please see demo_phrase_machine.py .
Added CompactTerms for removing redundant and infrequent terms from term document matrices. These occur if a word or phrase is always part of a larger phrase; the shorter phrase is considered redundant and removed from the corpus. See demo_phrase_machine.py for an example.
Added FourSquare , a pattern that allows for the creation of a semiotic square with separate categories for each corner. Please see demo_four_square.py for an early example.
Finally, added a way to easily perform T-SNE-style visualizations on a categorized corpus. This uses, by default, the umap-learn package. Please see demo_tsne_style.py.
Fixed to ScaledFScorePresets(one_to_neg_one=True) , added UnigramsFromSpacyDoc .
Now, when using CorpusFromPandas , a CorpusDF object is returned, instead of a Corpus object. This new type of object keeps a reference to the source data frame, and returns it via the CorpusDF.get_df() method.
The factory CorpusFromFeatureDict was added. It allows you to directly specify term counts and metadata item counts within the dataframe. Please see test_corpusFromFeatureDict.py for an example.
Added a very semiotic square creator.
The idea to build a semiotic square that contrasts two categories in a Term Document Matrix while using other categories as neutral categories.
See Creating semiotic squares for an overview on how to use this functionality and semiotic squares.
Added a parameter to disable the display of the top-terms sidebar, eg, produce_scattertext_explorer(..., show_top_terms=False, ...) .
An interface to part of the subjectivity/sentiment dataset from Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. ``A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts''. ACL. 2004. See SampleCorpora.RottenTomatoes .
Fixed bug that caused tooltip placement to be off after scrolling.
Made category_name and not_category_name optional in produce_scattertext_explorer etc.
Created the ability to customize tooltips via the get_tooltip_content argument to produce_scattertext_explorer etc., control axes labels via x_axis_values and y_axis_values . The color_func parameter is a Javascript function to control color of a point. Function takes a parameter which is a dictionary entry produced by ScatterChartExplorer.to_dict and returns a string.
Integration with Scikit-Learn's text-analysis pipeline led the creation of the CorpusFromScikit and TermDocMatrixFromScikit classes.
The AutoTermSelector class to automatically suggest terms to appear in the visualization.
This can make it easier to show large data sets, and remove fiddling with the various minimum term frequency parameters.
For an example of how to use CorpusFromScikit and AutoTermSelector , please see demo_sklearn.py
Also, I updated the library and examples to be compatible with spaCy 2.
Fixed bug when processing single-word documents, and set the default beta to 2.
Added produce_frequency_explorer function, and adding the PEP 369-compliant __version__ attribute as mentioned in #19. Fixed bug when creating visualizations with more than two possible categories. Now, by default, category names will not be title-cased in the visualization, but will retain their original case.
If you'd still like to do this this, use ScatterChart (or a descendant).to_dict(..., title_case_names=True) . Fixed DocsAndLabelsFromCorpus for Py 2 compatibility.
Fixed bugs in chinese_nlp when jieba has already been imported and in p-value computation when performing log-odds-ratio w/ prior scoring.
Added demo for performing a Monroe et. al (2008) style visualization of log-odds-ratio scores in demo_log_odds_ratio_prior.py .
Breaking change: pmi_filter_thresold has been replaced with pmi_threshold_coefficient .
Added Emoji and Tweet analysis. See Emoji analysis.
Characteristic terms falls back ot "Most frequent" if no terms used in the chart are present in the background corpus.
Fixed top-term calculation for custom scores.
Set scaled f-score's default beta to 0.5.
Added --spacy_language_model argument to the CLI.
Added the alternative_text_field option in produce_scattertext_explorer to show an alternative text field when showing contexts in the interactive HTML visualization.
Updated ParsedCorpus.get_unigram_corpus to allow for continued alternative_text_field functionality.
Added ability to for Scattertext to use noun chunks instead of unigrams and bigrams through the FeatsFromSpacyDocOnlyNounChunks class. In order to use it, run your favorite Corpus or TermDocMatrix factory, and pass in an instance of the class as a parameter:
st.CorpusFromParsedDocuments(..., feats_from_spacy_doc=st.FeatsFromSpacyDocOnlyNounChunks())
Fixed a bug in corpus construction that occurs when the last document has no features.
Now you don't have to install tinysegmenter to use Scattertext. But you need to install it if you want to parse Japanese. This caused a problem when Scattertext was being installed on Windows.
Added TermDocMatrix.get_corner_score , giving an improved version of the Rudder Score. Exposing whitespace_nlp_with_sentences . It's a lightweight bad regex sentence splitter built a top a bad regex tokenizer that somewhat apes spaCy's API. Use it if you don't have spaCy and the English model downloaded or if you care more about memory footprint and speed than accuracy.
It's not compatible with word_similarity_explorer but is compatible with `word_similarity_explorer_gensim'.
Tweaked scaled f-score normalization.
Fixed Javascript bug when clicking on '$'.
Fixed bug in Scaled F-Score computations, and changed computation to better score words that are inversely correlated to category.
Added Word2VecFromParsedCorpus to automate training Gensim word vectors from a corpus, and
word_similarity_explorer_gensim to produce the visualization.
See demo_gensim_similarity.py for an example.
Added the d3_url and d3_scale_chromatic_url parameters to produce_scattertext_explorer . This provides a way to manually specify the paths to "d3.js" (ie, the file from "https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/d3/4.6.0/d3.min.js") and "d3-scale-chromatic.v1.js" (ie, the file from "https://d3js.org/d3-scale-chromatic.v1.min.js").
This is important if you're getting the error:
Javascript error adding output!
TypeError: d3.scaleLinear is not a function
See your browser Javascript console for more details.
It also lets you use Scattertext if you're serving in an environment with no (or a restricted) external Internet connection.
For example, if "d3.min.js" and "d3-scale-chromatic.v1.min.js" were present in the current working directory, calling the following code would reference them locally instead of the remote Javascript files. See Visualizing term associations for code context.
>>> html = st.produce_scattertext_explorer(corpus,
... category='democrat',
... category_name='Democratic',
... not_category_name='Republican',
... width_in_pixels=1000,
... metadata=convention_df['speaker'],
... d3_url='d3.min.js',
... d3_scale_chromatic_url='d3-scale-chromatic.v1.min.js')
Fixed a bug in 0.0.2.6.0 that transposed default axis labels.
Added a Japanese mode to Scattertext. See demo_japanese.py for an example of how to use Japanese. Please run pip install tinysegmenter to parse Japanese.
Also, the chiense_mode boolean parameter in produce_scattertext_explorer has been renamed to asian_mode .
For example, the output of demo_japanese.py is:
Custom term positions and axis labels. Although not recommended, you can visualize different metrics on each axis in visualizations similar to Monroe et al. (2008). Please see Custom term positions for more info.
Enhanced the visualization of query-based categorical differences, aka the word_similarity_explorer function. When run, a plot is produced that contains category associated terms colored in either red or blue hues, and terms not associated with either class colored in greyscale and slightly smaller. The intensity of each color indicates association with the query term. Por ejemplo:
Some minor bug fixes, and added a minimum_not_category_term_frequency parameter. This fixes a problem with visualizing imbalanced datasets. It sets a minimum number of times a word that does not appear in the target category must appear before it is displayed.
Added TermDocMatrix.remove_entity_tags method to remove entity type tags from the analysis.
Fixed matched snippet not displaying issue #9, and fixed a Python 2 issue in created a visualization using a ParsedCorpus prepared via CorpusFromParsedDocuments , mentioned in the latter part of the issue #8 discussion.
Again, Python 2 is supported in experimental mode only.
Corrected example links on this Readme.
Fixed a bug in Issue 8 where the HTML visualization produced by produce_scattertext_html would fail.
Fixed a couple issues that rendered Scattertext broken in Python 2. Chinese processing still does not work.
Note: Use Python 3.4+ if you can.
Fixed links in Readme, and made regex NLP available in CLI.
Added the command line tool, and fixed a bug related to Empath visualizations.
Ability to see how a particular term is discussed differently between categories through the word_similarity_explorer function.
Specialized mode to view sparse term scores.
Fixed a bug that was caused by repeated values in background unigram counts.
Added true alphabetical term sorting in visualizations.
Added an optional save-as-SVG button.
Addition option of showing characteristic terms (from the full set of documents) being considered. The option ( show_characteristic in produce_scattertext_explorer ) is on by default, but currently unavailable for Chinese. If you know of a good Chinese wordcount list, please let me know. The algorithm used to produce these is F-Score.
See this and the following slide for more details
Added document and word count statistics to main visualization.
Added preliminary support for visualizing Empath (Fast 2016) topics categories instead of emotions. See the tutorial for more information.
Improved term-labeling.
Addition of strip_final_period param to FeatsFromSpacyDoc to deal with spaCy tokenization of all-caps documents that can leave periods at the end of terms.
I've added support for Chinese, including the ChineseNLP class, which uses a RegExp-based sentence splitter and Jieba for word segmentation. To use it, see the demo_chinese.py file. Note that CorpusFromPandas currently does not support ChineseNLP.
In order for the visualization to work, set the asian_mode flag to True in produce_scattertext_explorer .
