Recently, the copyright dispute between iQiyi, a well-known domestic video streaming platform, and AI startup MiniMax, has attracted widespread attention. According to reports on January 6, iQiyi has officially filed a lawsuit with the People's Court of Xuhui District, Shanghai, accusing MiniMax of suspected infringement of its copyright during AI model training and content generation. This case not only involves the boundaries of technological innovation, but also triggers in-depth discussions on the relationship between copyright protection and AI development.

According to relevant reports, MiniMax is accused of using materials that iQiyi enjoys copyright for AI model training without authorization, and generated suspected infringement content based on these materials. iQiyi said that this behavior seriously infringed on its legitimate rights and interests, and asked MiniMax to immediately stop the infringement and claim about 100,000 yuan in compensation. The core of this case is whether the use of copyrighted materials in AI technology during training constitutes infringement and how to define the copyright ownership of AI-generated content.
In the face of the allegations, MiniMax may challenge the claim that the material used is public resources or entered by the user and attempt to exempt it from legal liability in accordance with the principle of technical neutrality. The principle of technology neutrality usually means that technology itself should not be responsible for its application consequences, but in actual operation, the applicability of this principle is often tested by both law and ethics. The success of MiniMax's defense will depend on the court's specific determination of its use material and the applicability of the principle of technical neutrality in this case.
As of press time, iQiyi and MiniMax have not yet made a public response to this incident, and the legal disputes between the two parties are still developing further. The results of this case will not only affect the future direction of the two companies, but may also provide important precedent references for copyright issues in the field of AI technology. With the rapid development of AI technology, how to promote technological innovation while protecting copyright will become a common challenge faced by the industry and the legal community.
This dispute once again highlights the complexity of AI technology in the field of content creation. Training of AI models relies on large amounts of data, which often contain copyrighted content. How to find a balance between data use and copyright protection is a problem that AI companies and content creators need to solve together. In the future, with the improvement of relevant laws and regulations and the development of technology, the relationship between AI and copyright will be clearer, but before this, similar legal disputes may still occur frequently.